← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lactate and Dextrose side effects: what 8,147 FDA adverse event reports show

Sodium Chloride, Sodium Lactate, Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Chloride And Dextrose · 564 reaction terms · 15,671 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

No validated FDA label found

closest label found was a multi-ingredient product (Sodium Chloride, Sodium Lactate, Calcium Chloride, Magnesium Chloride And Dextrose) and was not used

Who reports

8,147 reports · 90% serious · 3,940 with death outcome · 45% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

—

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 4Outcome field, not a reaction 2No label text to screen 34
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 524 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Inadequate peritoneal dialysis28618.2
409.2–933.8ROR 620.3 · χ² 13,383 / p <1e-300
371.0 EB05 269.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=27 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Peritoneal effluent abnormal29310.7
211.4–456.6ROR 311.8 · χ² 7,702 / p <1e-300
234.3 EB05 171.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=29 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Ultrafiltration failure196278.5
240.7–322.2ROR 285.3 · χ² 48,588 / p <1e-300
245.1 EB05 217.6 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=178 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Peritoneal cloudy effluent126269.1
224.2–322.9ROR 273.3 · χ² 30,185 / p <1e-300
234.7 EB05 202.3 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=126 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Noninfectious peritonitis21243.5
155.7–380.8ROR 244.1 · χ² 4,408 / p <1e-300
185.1 EB05 127.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=21no trial data cached
Peritoneal dialysis complication320117.0
104.8–130.6ROR 121.7 · χ² 35,073 / p <1e-300
111.1 EB05 101.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=278no trial data cached
Diabetic foot124108.5
90.8–129.7ROR 110.2 · χ² 12,567 / p <1e-300
102.5 EB05 88.2 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=124no trial data cached
Bacterial translocation1192.5
50.7–168.7ROR 92.6 · χ² 874 / p 2e-192
77.7 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=11no trial data cached
Bloody peritoneal effluent3079.0
55.0–113.6ROR 79.3 · χ² 2,166 / p <1e-300
73.2 EB05 53.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=30 · ♀ 24% (drug 45%) · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Peritonitis60176.9
71.1–83.2ROR 83.0 · χ² 43,678 / p <1e-300
74.5 EB05 69.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 48.0no trial data cached
Fungal peritonitis3865.8
47.7–90.7ROR 66.1 · χ² 2,300 / p <1e-300
62.2 EB05 47.3 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=38no trial data cached
Peritoneal disorder1560.5
36.2–100.8ROR 60.6 · χ² 800 / p 3e-176
55.2 EB05 35.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=14no trial data cached
Multimorbidity2758.9
40.2–86.2ROR 59.1 · χ² 1,446 / p <1e-300
55.4 EB05 40.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=27no trial data cached
Peritonitis bacterial21455.9
48.9–63.9ROR 57.4 · χ² 11,241 / p <1e-300
54.5 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 35.1no trial data cached
Abdominal sepsis1648.0
29.3–78.6ROR 48.1 · χ² 677 / p 2e-149
44.8 EB05 29.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=16no trial data cached
Extremity necrosis3146.2
32.4–65.9ROR 46.4 · χ² 1,304 / p 9e-286
44.3 EB05 32.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=31no trial data cached
Fluid overload22940.5
35.6–46.1ROR 41.7 · χ² 8,661 / p <1e-300
39.8 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 16.4 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Disease complication6436.3
28.4–46.4ROR 36.6 · χ² 2,133 / p <1e-300
35.5 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=62no trial data cached
Catheter site infection4934.2
25.8–45.3ROR 34.4 · χ² 1,524 / p <1e-300
33.3 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=44no trial data cached
Acute myocardial infarction32828.8
25.9–32.1ROR 30.0 · χ² 8,695 / p <1e-300
28.5 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 18.3 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Pulmonary sepsis1527.0
16.2–44.8ROR 27.0 · χ² 346 / p 2e-77
25.9 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=15no trial data cached
Device related infection14223.9
20.3–28.2ROR 24.3 · χ² 3,066 / p <1e-300
23.6 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.5no trial data cached
Cardio-respiratory arrest34921.5
19.4–23.8ROR 22.4 · χ² 6,762 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Soft tissue infection1521.5
12.9–35.7ROR 21.5 · χ² 270 / p 5e-61
20.7 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=15no trial data cached
Nosocomial infection1821.1
13.3–33.6ROR 21.2 · χ² 323 / p 2e-72
20.5 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=18no trial data cached
Diabetic complication1919.2
12.2–30.1ROR 19.2 · χ² 308 / p 4e-69
18.6 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=19no trial data cached
Hypervolaemia2714.6
10.0–21.2ROR 14.6 · χ² 326 / p 4e-73
14.1 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=27 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Brain death1714.2
8.8–22.8ROR 14.2 · χ² 194 / p 2e-44
13.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious n=17no trial data cached
Umbilical hernia2513.8
9.3–20.4ROR 13.8 · χ² 283 / p 1e-63
13.2 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=24no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive42013.4
12.2–14.7ROR 14.1 · χ² 4,798 / p <1e-300
13.3 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 8.6no trial data cached
Hypertensive crisis5713.2
10.2–17.1ROR 13.3 · χ² 628 / p 7e-139
13.0 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 8.5 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Cerebrovascular disorder1411.9
7.0–20.1ROR 11.9 · χ² 128 / p 5e-30
10.5 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=14no trial data cached
Abdominal infection1111.2
6.2–20.2ROR 11.2 · χ² 91 / p 6e-22
9.2 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=11no trial data cached
Azotaemia1711.0
6.8–17.6ROR 11.0 · χ² 143 / p 2e-33
9.7 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=17no trial data cached
Peripheral vascular disorder2010.0
6.4–15.4ROR 10.0 · χ² 152 / p 4e-35
8.9 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=20no trial data cached
Gangrene239.8
6.5–14.7ROR 9.8 · χ² 172 / p 1e-39
8.9 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=23no trial data cached
Cerebral thrombosis109.1
4.9–17.0ROR 9.1 · χ² 64 / p 6e-16
7.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=10no trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)3929.1
8.2–10.0ROR 9.5 · χ² 2,811 / p <1e-300
9.0 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Sudden death378.9
6.5–12.3ROR 9.0 · χ² 252 / p 5e-57
8.3 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 5.7 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Inguinal hernia208.5
5.5–13.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
7.4 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious n=16 · ♀ 20% (drug 45%)no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Death1,3534.0
3.9–4.3ROR 4.7 · χ² 3,230 / p <1e-300
4.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Peritonitis60176.9
71.1–83.2ROR 83.0 · χ² 43,678 / p <1e-300
74.5 EB05 69.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 48.0no trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)5107.5
6.9–8.1ROR 7.9 · χ² 2,874 / p <1e-300
7.4 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 4.8no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive42013.4
12.2–14.7ROR 14.1 · χ² 4,798 / p <1e-300
13.3 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 8.6no trial data cached
Sepsis (blood infection)3929.1
8.2–10.0ROR 9.5 · χ² 2,811 / p <1e-300
9.0 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Infection3626.5
5.9–7.2ROR 6.7 · χ² 1,678 / p <1e-300
6.4 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 5.1 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Hypotension (low blood pressure)3554.6
4.1–5.1ROR 4.7 · χ² 994 / p 2e-218
4.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Cardio-respiratory arrest34921.5
19.4–23.8ROR 22.4 · χ² 6,762 / p <1e-300
21.3 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 13.7no trial data cached
Acute myocardial infarction32828.8
25.9–32.1ROR 30.0 · χ² 8,695 / p <1e-300
28.5 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 18.3 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Peritoneal dialysis complication320117.0
104.8–130.6ROR 121.7 · χ² 35,073 / p <1e-300
111.1 EB05 101.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=278no trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)2612.1
1.8–2.3ROR 2.1 · χ² 147 / p 3e-34
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screenserious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Fluid overload22940.5
35.6–46.1ROR 41.7 · χ² 8,661 / p <1e-300
39.8 EB05 35.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 16.4 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2171.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.439
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
No label text to screenserious PRR 0.8no trial data cached
Peritonitis bacterial21455.9
48.9–63.9ROR 57.4 · χ² 11,241 / p <1e-300
54.5 EB05 48.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screenserious PRR 35.1no trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)2101.4
1.3–1.6ROR 1.4 · χ² 28 / p 6e-8
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3No label text to screenserious PRR 1.3 · 80% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lactate and Dextrose?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lactate and Dextrose are peritonitis, myocardial infarction, cardiac failure congestive, sepsis, infection, hypotension. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lactate and Dextrose have an FDA boxed warning?

No validated FDA label could be retrieved for this product name, so this page cannot say.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lactate and Dextrose causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.