Sucralfate side effects: what 23,812 FDA adverse event reports show
Brand names
Carafate
Who reports
23,812 reports · 69% serious · 2,309 with death outcome · 68% female
Used for
CARAFATE (sucralfate) Oral Suspension is indicated in the short-term (up to 8 weeks) treatment of active duodenal ulcer.
What it is
DESCRIPTION CARAFATE Oral Suspension contains sucralfate and sucralfate is an α-D-glucopyranoside, β-D- fructofuranosyl-, octakis-(hydrogen sulfate), aluminum complex. CARAFATE Oral Suspension for oral administration contains 1 g of sucralfate per 10 mL.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,133 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaginal flatulence | 159 | 964.8 770.0–1,208.9ROR 971.3 · calibrated p 8e-17 ✓ | 433.4 EB05 379.8 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=159 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Female genital tract fistula | 166 | 94.0 80.1–110.2ROR 94.6 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 84.1 EB05 73.9 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=166 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Radiculopathy | 175 | 62.5 53.7–72.9ROR 63.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 58.1 EB05 51.2 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=172 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Proctitis | 164 | 54.7 46.7–64.0ROR 55.0 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓ | 51.2 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=164 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder | 58 | 50.1 38.5–65.3ROR 50.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 46.8 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.1–2.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=58 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic sinusitis | 159 | 39.0 33.3–45.7ROR 39.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓ | 37.2 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=157 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nephrogenic anaemia | 179 | 35.0 30.2–40.6ROR 35.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 33.6 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.3–1.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=179 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Rebound acid hypersecretion | 107 | 31.8 26.2–38.5ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.6 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.2–2.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=107 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hyperparathyroidism secondary | 88 | 31.7 25.6–39.2ROR 31.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.4 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.2–2.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=88 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Adenocarcinoma gastric | 32 | 31.7 22.3–45.0ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 30.1 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.4 (0.9–2.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Reflux gastritis | 38 | 28.9 20.9–40.0ROR 29.0 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 27.7 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.3 (0.9–2.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Enterococcus test positive | 20 | 27.8 17.8–43.4ROR 27.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 26.4 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.6–1.8) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=20 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Biliary dyskinesia | 49 | 25.9 19.5–34.4ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 24.9 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.1 (1.4–3.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Peptic ulcer | 82 | 22.3 17.9–27.7ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.6 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.8 (1.4–2.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=77 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Early satiety | 47 | 22.2 16.6–29.7ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.5 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=46 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oesophageal ulcer | 73 | 16.9 13.4–21.3ROR 17.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.5 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=66 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastric polyps | 42 | 16.6 12.3–22.6ROR 16.7 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 16.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.6 (1.7–4.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=38 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vaginal discharge | 171 | 15.2 13.1–17.7ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 14.9 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=166 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gallbladder injury | 33 | 15.2 10.8–21.5ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.7 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.9 (1.2–3.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Impaired gastric emptying | 216 | 15.2 13.3–17.3ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 14.9 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 13.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oral candidiasis (oral thrush) | 218 | 15.0 13.1–17.1ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 14.7 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Cholecystitis chronic | 106 | 14.0 11.5–16.9ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 13.7 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.3 (1.7–3.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastritis haemorrhagic | 23 | 13.7 9.0–20.6ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 12.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Erosive oesophagitis | 26 | 13.6 9.3–20.1ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓ | 13.0 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.4 (1.3–4.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
| End stage renal disease | 270 | 13.1 11.6–14.7ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 12.9 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.3–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oesophagitis | 160 | 13.1 11.2–15.3ROR 13.1 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 12.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.0 (1.6–2.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oesophageal pain | 57 | 12.9 9.9–16.7ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 12.5 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.0 (1.4–2.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oesophageal spasm | 25 | 12.1 8.2–17.9ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Macular degeneration | 160 | 12.0 10.2–14.0ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 11.7 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 10.7 · ♀ 95% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Oesophageal stenosis | 38 | 11.9 8.6–16.3ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.1 (1.3–3.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastric ulcer | 251 | 11.8 10.4–13.3ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓ | 11.6 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.5–2.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastritis | 339 | 11.5 10.3–12.8ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.9 (1.7–2.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic kidney disease | 986 | 11.5 10.8–12.2ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hiatus hernia | 162 | 11.1 9.5–13.0ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓ | 10.9 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.2 (1.8–2.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Acute sinusitis | 21 | 10.9 7.1–16.7ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓ | 9.8 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=17 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site discharge | 20 | 10.4 6.7–16.2ROR 10.4 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓ | 9.3 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (0.9–2.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=17 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Duodenitis | 35 | 10.2 7.3–14.2ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓ | 9.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.8) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=35 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ulcer haemorrhage | 74 | 9.7 7.7–12.2ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓ | 9.4 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.8 (1.3–2.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=72 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Gastrointestinal ulcer | 24 | 9.6 6.4–14.3ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.2 (1.2–3.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=22 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood loss anaemia | 24 | 9.6 6.4–14.3ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | 2,353 | 2.6 2.5–2.7ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.692 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.6–1.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 1,798 | 2.0 2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.990 | 2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 1,765 | 2.4 2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.799 | 2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 1,519 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.924 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 1,427 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.983 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vomiting | 1,411 | 2.7 2.5–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.710 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 1,356 | 2.1 2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.961 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 1,355 | 1.4 1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.574 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 1,337 | 0.9 0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.236 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.3 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dizziness | 1,078 | 1.9 1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.917 | 1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Weight decreased (weight loss) | 1,024 | 3.2 3.1–3.4ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.526 | 3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Abdominal pain | 1,023 | 3.9 3.7–4.1ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.375 | 3.9 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malaise (feeling unwell) | 1,000 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.971 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic kidney disease | 986 | 11.5 10.8–12.2ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓ | 11.3 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 9.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 983 | 2.7 2.5–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.712 | 2.7 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.5–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Vaginal flatulence — n=159, PRR 964.8
- Female genital tract fistula — n=166, PRR 94.0
- Radiculopathy — n=175, PRR 62.5
- Proctitis — n=164, PRR 54.7
- Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder — n=58, PRR 50.1
- Chronic sinusitis — n=159, PRR 39.0
- Nephrogenic anaemia — n=179, PRR 35.0
- Rebound acid hypersecretion — n=107, PRR 31.8
- Hyperparathyroidism secondary — n=88, PRR 31.7
- Adenocarcinoma gastric — n=32, PRR 31.7
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Sucralfate?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Sucralfate are nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, pain, headache, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Sucralfate have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Sucralfate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Sucralfate causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 0fb67b1c-b4c0-46f2-8a81-df1510e006aa, effective 20230608; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"SUCRALFATE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,173 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
SUCRALFATE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.