← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Sucralfate side effects: what 23,812 FDA adverse event reports show

Sucralfate · Carafate · 1,173 reaction terms · 115,437 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Aluminum Complex

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Carafate

openFDA label

Who reports

23,812 reports · 69% serious · 2,309 with death outcome · 68% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

CARAFATE (sucralfate) Oral Suspension is indicated in the short-term (up to 8 weeks) treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION CARAFATE Oral Suspension contains sucralfate and sucralfate is an α-D-glucopyranoside, β-D- fructofuranosyl-, octakis-(hydrogen sulfate), aluminum complex. CARAFATE Oral Suspension for oral administration contains 1 g of sucralfate per 10 mL.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 37
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,133 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence159964.8
770.0–1,208.9ROR 971.3 · calibrated p 8e-17 ✓
433.4 EB05 379.8 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=159 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Female genital tract fistula16694.0
80.1–110.2ROR 94.6 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
84.1 EB05 73.9 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=166 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Radiculopathy17562.5
53.7–72.9ROR 63.0 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
58.1 EB05 51.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=172 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Proctitis16454.7
46.7–64.0ROR 55.0 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
51.2 EB05 44.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=164 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder5850.1
38.5–65.3ROR 50.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.8 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.1–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58no trial arm names this drug
Chronic sinusitis15939.0
33.3–45.7ROR 39.2 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
37.2 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=157 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Nephrogenic anaemia17935.0
30.2–40.6ROR 35.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.6 EB05 29.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.3–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=179no trial arm names this drug
Rebound acid hypersecretion10731.8
26.2–38.5ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.6 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.2–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=107no trial arm names this drug
Hyperparathyroidism secondary8831.7
25.6–39.2ROR 31.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.4 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.2–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88no trial arm names this drug
Adenocarcinoma gastric3231.7
22.3–45.0ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
30.1 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.4 (0.9–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Reflux gastritis3828.9
20.9–40.0ROR 29.0 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.7 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.3 (0.9–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Enterococcus test positive2027.8
17.8–43.4ROR 27.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
26.4 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.6–1.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20no trial arm names this drug
Biliary dyskinesia4925.9
19.5–34.4ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
24.9 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.1 (1.4–3.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Peptic ulcer8222.3
17.9–27.7ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.6 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.8 (1.4–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77no trial arm names this drug
Early satiety4722.2
16.6–29.7ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.5 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46no trial arm names this drug
Oesophageal ulcer7316.9
13.4–21.3ROR 17.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.5 EB05 13.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.4 (1.0–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66no trial arm names this drug
Gastric polyps4216.6
12.3–22.6ROR 16.7 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.2 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.6 (1.7–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38no trial arm names this drug
Vaginal discharge17115.2
13.1–17.7ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.9 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=166 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Gallbladder injury3315.2
10.8–21.5ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.7 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.9 (1.2–3.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Oral candidiasis (oral thrush)21815.0
13.1–17.1ROR 15.1 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.7 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.8no trial arm names this drug
Cholecystitis chronic10614.0
11.5–16.9ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.7 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.3 (1.7–3.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Gastritis haemorrhagic2313.7
9.0–20.6ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial arm names this drug
Erosive oesophagitis2613.6
9.3–20.1ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
13.0 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.4 (1.3–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial arm names this drug
End stage renal disease27013.1
11.6–14.7ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.9 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.3–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8no trial arm names this drug
Oesophagitis16013.1
11.2–15.3ROR 13.1 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
12.8 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.0 (1.6–2.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8no trial arm names this drug
Oesophageal pain5712.9
9.9–16.7ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.5 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.0 (1.4–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32no trial arm names this drug
Oesophageal spasm2512.1
8.2–17.9ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
11.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Macular degeneration16012.0
10.2–14.0ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.7 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.7 · ♀ 95% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Oesophageal stenosis3811.9
8.6–16.3ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
11.3 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.1 (1.3–3.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36no trial arm names this drug
Gastric ulcer25111.8
10.4–13.3ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.6 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.5–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.3no trial arm names this drug
Gastritis33911.5
10.3–12.8ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
11.3 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.9 (1.7–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.1no trial arm names this drug
Chronic kidney disease98611.5
10.8–12.2ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.3 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial arm names this drug
Hiatus hernia16211.1
9.5–13.0ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.9 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.2 (1.8–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5no trial arm names this drug
Acute sinusitis2110.9
7.1–16.7ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.8 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial arm names this drug
Infusion site discharge2010.4
6.7–16.2ROR 10.4 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.3 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (0.9–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%)no trial arm names this drug
Duodenitis3510.2
7.3–14.2ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓
9.5 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.8)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=35no trial arm names this drug
Ulcer haemorrhage749.7
7.7–12.2ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓
9.4 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.8 (1.3–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72no trial arm names this drug
Gastrointestinal ulcer249.6
6.4–14.3ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
8.6 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 2.2 (1.2–3.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22no trial arm names this drug
Blood loss anaemia249.6
6.4–14.3ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
8.6 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (0.9–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Sucralfate only as a background or rescue medication (NCT00584922); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea2,3532.6
2.5–2.7ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.692
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.6–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.0no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)1,7982.0
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.990
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.2no trial arm names this drug
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,7652.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.799
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5no trial arm names this drug
Pain1,5192.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.924
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2no trial arm names this drug
Headache1,4272.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.983
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4no trial arm names this drug
Vomiting1,4112.7
2.5–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.710
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.6no trial arm names this drug
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,3562.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.961
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.0no trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,3551.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.574
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,3370.9
0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.236
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.2no trial arm names this drug
Dizziness1,0781.9
1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.917
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9no trial arm names this drug
Weight decreased (weight loss)1,0243.2
3.1–3.4ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.526
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4no trial arm names this drug
Abdominal pain1,0233.9
3.7–4.1ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.375
3.9 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.7no trial arm names this drug
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,0002.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.971
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial arm names this drug
Chronic kidney disease98611.5
10.8–12.2ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.3 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.6no trial arm names this drug
Pneumonia (lung infection)9832.7
2.5–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.712
2.7 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Aluminum Complexs: PRR 1.7 (1.5–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Sucralfate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Sucralfate are nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, pain, headache, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Sucralfate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Sucralfate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Sucralfate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.