← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Bendamustine Hydrochloride side effects: what 8,443 FDA adverse event reports show

Bendamustine Hydrochloride · 999 reaction terms · 35,055 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Alkylating drug

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Bendamustine Hydrochloride (Bendamustine Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

8,443 reports · 92% serious · 1,603 with death outcome · 40% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Bendamustine Hydrochloride Injection is an alkylating drug indicated for treatment of adult patients with: • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Efficacy relative to first line therapies other than chlorambucil has not been established. ( 1.1 ) • Indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Bendamustine hydrochloride is an alkylating agent.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 4Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 11Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 959 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Mantle cell lymphoma recurrent58276.0
209.3–363.9ROR 277.4 · χ² 13,478 / p <1e-300
221.0 EB05 177.3 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=30no trial data cached
Lymphoma transformation36195.4
138.5–275.7ROR 196.0 · χ² 6,085 / p <1e-300
160.9 EB05 121.4 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=29 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Erythropoiesis abnormal25157.3
104.5–236.8ROR 157.7 · χ² 3,419 / p <1e-300
130.2 EB05 92.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Coronavirus pneumonia13155.7
88.3–274.6ROR 155.9 · χ² 1,695 / p <1e-300
118.6 EB05 73.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus enterocolitis44107.9
79.7–146.3ROR 108.3 · χ² 4,289 / p <1e-300
97.5 EB05 75.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41no trial data cached
Follicular lymphoma47102.7
76.6–137.7ROR 103.1 · χ² 4,373 / p <1e-300
93.4 EB05 73.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=46 · 98% clinicianno trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus chorioretinitis8884.2
68.0–104.2ROR 84.8 · χ² 6,819 / p <1e-300
79.0 EB05 66.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=82no trial data cached
Breakthrough covid-191079.0
41.9–148.8ROR 79.0 · χ² 663 / p 1e-146
66.4 EB05 38.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Vasogenic cerebral oedema2872.6
49.8–105.9ROR 72.8 · χ² 1,830 / p <1e-300
66.7 EB05 48.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 40%) · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Cd4 lymphocytes decreased8168.6
55.0–85.6ROR 69.1 · χ² 5,129 / p <1e-300
65.1 EB05 54.0 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=76no trial data cached
Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma recurrent7765.5
52.2–82.1ROR 65.9 · χ² 4,649 / p <1e-300
62.2 EB05 51.4 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=76 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Humoral immune defect1363.8
36.7–110.9ROR 63.9 · χ² 716 / p 6e-158
56.7 EB05 35.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Mantle cell lymphoma5262.5
47.4–82.4ROR 62.8 · χ² 2,979 / p <1e-300
59.1 EB05 46.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=45no trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus test positive5758.6
45.0–76.2ROR 58.8 · χ² 3,064 / p <1e-300
55.7 EB05 44.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=56no trial data cached
Therapy responder1555.2
33.0–92.3ROR 55.3 · χ² 722 / p 2e-159
50.3 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
B-cell lymphoma recurrent1446.7
27.5–79.3ROR 46.7 · χ² 566 / p 2e-125
43.0 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12no trial data cached
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia recurrent1744.3
27.4–71.6ROR 44.3 · χ² 660 / p 9e-146
41.4 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=9no trial data cached
Encephalitis cytomegalovirus1041.7
22.3–78.0ROR 41.7 · χ² 349 / p 4e-78
38.0 EB05 22.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma17441.1
35.4–47.7ROR 41.7 · χ² 6,611 / p <1e-300
40.0 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 33.4no trial data cached
Post-acute covid-19 syndrome2840.8
28.1–59.3ROR 40.9 · χ² 1,024 / p 6e-225
38.9 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia10840.8
33.7–49.3ROR 41.2 · χ² 4,059 / p <1e-300
39.6 EB05 33.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=62no trial data cached
Extravasation9340.5
33.0–49.7ROR 40.8 · χ² 3,459 / p <1e-300
39.3 EB05 33.0 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=5no trial data cached
Metastases to bone marrow1139.3
21.6–71.4ROR 39.4 · χ² 365 / p 1e-81
36.3 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Cerebral aspergillosis1338.1
22.0–66.0ROR 38.1 · χ² 424 / p 2e-94
35.5 EB05 22.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Granuloma skin1736.9
22.8–59.6ROR 36.9 · χ² 546 / p 4e-121
34.8 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Skin neoplasm excision1636.8
22.4–60.4ROR 36.9 · χ² 511 / p 2e-113
34.7 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Hypogammaglobulinaemia12735.6
29.9–42.4ROR 35.9 · χ² 4,149 / p <1e-300
34.7 EB05 29.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=116no trial data cached
Pneumonia cytomegaloviral3633.6
24.2–46.8ROR 33.7 · χ² 1,087 / p 1e-238
32.5 EB05 24.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 12% (drug 40%)no trial data cached
Aplasia pure red cell5830.2
23.3–39.1ROR 30.3 · χ² 1,580 / p <1e-300
29.4 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48no trial data cached
Tumour lysis syndrome14730.1
25.6–35.4ROR 30.5 · χ² 4,042 / p <1e-300
29.5 EB05 25.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.5no trial data cached
Plasma cell leukaemia1029.9
16.0–55.8ROR 29.9 · χ² 247 / p 6e-56
27.9 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10no trial data cached
Infusion site reaction4829.6
22.2–39.3ROR 29.7 · χ² 1,274 / p 2e-279
28.8 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=5no trial data cached
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy12827.7
23.3–33.0ROR 28.0 · χ² 3,222 / p <1e-300
27.2 EB05 23.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.9 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Cytomegalovirus viraemia6727.4
21.5–34.8ROR 27.5 · χ² 1,650 / p <1e-300
26.8 EB05 21.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Diffuse large b-cell lymphoma refractory1426.9
15.9–45.6ROR 26.9 · χ² 319 / p 1e-71
25.6 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=14no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,1332.3
2.2–2.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 867 / p 7e-191
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)8614.4
4.1–4.7ROR 4.7 · χ² 2,281 / p <1e-300
4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Disease progression5728.6
7.9–9.3ROR 9.0 · χ² 3,826 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.7 · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Rash5572.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 400 / p 3e-89
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Febrile neutropenia53514.3
13.2–15.6ROR 15.0 · χ² 6,591 / p <1e-300
14.2 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 8.9 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Neutropenia (low neutrophils (infection-fighting cells))5016.5
6.0–7.1ROR 6.8 · χ² 2,349 / p <1e-300
6.5 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Pneumonia (lung infection)4662.5
2.3–2.8ROR 2.6 · χ² 440 / p 5e-98
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)4480.6
0.5–0.7ROR 0.6 · χ² 128 / p 6e-30
0.6 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.9
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Death4240.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.5no trial data cached
Product use in unapproved indication4163.0
2.7–3.3ROR 3.1 · χ² 559 / p 6e-124
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 5.6no trial data cached
Covid-194114.1
3.7–4.5ROR 4.2 · χ² 966 / p 3e-212
4.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.2 · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Anaemia (low red blood cells)3953.7
3.3–4.0ROR 3.7 · χ² 763 / p 3e-168
3.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9 · 93% clinicianno trial data cached
Pancytopenia (all blood cells low)38612.3
11.1–13.5ROR 12.7 · χ² 3,970 / p <1e-300
12.2 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Bendamustine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Bendamustine are pyrexia, rash, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, pneumonia, platelet count decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Bendamustine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Bendamustine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Bendamustine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.