Dextroamphetamine combination (4 ingredients) side effects: what 41,214 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Central Nervous System Stimulant
Brand names
Xelstrym
Who reports
41,214 reports · 44% serious · 504 with death outcome · 71% female
Used for
XELSTRYM ® is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in adults and pediatric patients 6 years and older . Limitations of Use The use of XELSTRYM is not recommended in pediatric patien.
What it is
XELSTRYM (dextroamphetamine) transdermal system, contains dextroamphetamine, a CNS stimulant. Dextroamphetamine is the dextro isomer of the compound d , l -amphetamine.
Boxed warning
ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION XELSTRYM has a high potential for abuse and misuse, which can lead to the development of a substance use disorder, including addiction. Misuse and abuse of CNS stimulants, including XELST.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,149 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cataplexy | 175 | 70.9 60.6–83.1ROR 71.2 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 61.9 EB05 54.5 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 17.3 (14.2–20.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=133 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pre-existing condition improved | 679 | 61.3 56.6–66.3ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 54.6 EB05 51.3 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 28.0 (25.1–31.2) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=358 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product administration interrupted | 647 | 46.8 43.2–50.7ROR 47.5 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 42.8 EB05 40.1 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 32.3 (28.7–36.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=597 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Asthma exercise induced | 25 | 39.4 26.2–59.1ROR 39.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 35.7 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Periodic limb movement disorder | 24 | 35.3 23.4–53.5ROR 35.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 32.3 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sleep-related eating disorder | 61 | 35.3 27.2–45.7ROR 35.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.7 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 17.6 (12.6–24.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sleep paralysis | 94 | 34.8 28.3–42.9ROR 34.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.4 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 31.5 (23.2–42.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=50 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Manufacturing issue | 28 | 33.3 22.7–48.8ROR 33.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.7 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Narcolepsy | 115 | 33.0 27.3–39.8ROR 33.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.8 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 16.6 (13.1–21.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=103 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Perinatal depression | 25 | 30.2 20.1–45.2ROR 30.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓ | 28.0 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Parasomnia | 37 | 28.3 20.3–39.4ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 26.5 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 12.9 (8.7–19.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=20 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Abnormal sleep-related event | 66 | 26.6 20.8–34.1ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 25.2 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 23.4 (16.7–32.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sleep attacks | 23 | 25.9 17.0–39.3ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓ | 24.2 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ehlers-danlos syndrome | 22 | 25.3 16.5–38.9ROR 25.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 23.7 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=18 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | 189 | 24.2 –ROR 24.3 · – | – | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=134 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome | 58 | 23.5 18.1–30.6ROR 23.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.3 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 36.4 (24.3–54.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=45 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Somnambulism | 288 | 23.2 20.6–26.1ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓ | 22.2 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 23.3 (19.8–27.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=162 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Enuresis | 176 | 23.1 19.9–26.9ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.1 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 15.1 (12.5–18.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=86 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome | 60 | 22.8 17.6–29.5ROR 22.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.7 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 22.9 (16.1–32.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=55 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Substance use | 66 | 22.7 17.7–29.1ROR 22.7 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.7 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 17.6 (12.8–24.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=38 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Snoring | 158 | 22.2 18.9–26.0ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.2 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 25.1 (20.1–31.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=87 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder | 126 | 20.3 17.0–24.3ROR 20.4 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 19.5 EB05 16.8 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 9.0 (7.3–11.0) | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=72 · 76% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Amphetamines positive | 28 | 19.5 13.4–28.4ROR 19.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 18.5 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 40.3 (22.1–73.6) | Lab value / disease marker | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dissociation | 278 | 19.4 17.2–21.9ROR 19.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 18.7 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 40.5 (33.4–49.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=245 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Job dissatisfaction | 23 | 18.7 12.3–28.3ROR 18.7 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 17.7 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sleep apnoea syndrome | 646 | 17.7 16.4–19.2ROR 18.0 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.2 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 15.3 (13.9–16.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 25.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Inability to afford medication | 308 | 16.4 14.7–18.4ROR 16.5 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓ | 15.9 EB05 14.5 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 58.0 (47.2–71.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=47 · 74% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Hangover | 107 | 15.8 13.1–19.2ROR 15.9 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓ | 15.3 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 27.8 (21.1–36.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=52 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product tampering | 52 | 15.1 11.5–19.9ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 14.6 EB05 11.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 318.1 (115.0–879.3) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=28 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Thyrotoxic crisis | 32 | 14.8 10.4–21.0ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓ | 14.1 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 71%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Terminal insomnia | 48 | 14.4 10.8–19.2ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓ | 13.9 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 15.7 (10.9–22.5) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Product availability issue | 609 | 14.2 13.1–15.4ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓ | 13.8 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 19.1 (17.2–21.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 5.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sudden onset of sleep | 37 | 13.8 10.0–19.2ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 13.2 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sleep talking | 44 | 13.4 9.9–18.1ROR 13.4 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓ | 12.8 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 17.4 (11.8–25.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Post-traumatic stress disorder | 171 | 13.3 11.4–15.4ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓ | 12.9 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 28.3 (22.7–35.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=146 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Therapeutic product effect variable | 95 | 12.9 10.6–15.9ROR 13.0 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓ | 12.5 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 24.2 (18.2–32.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=22 · 80% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Tachyphrenia | 85 | 12.8 10.3–15.8ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓ | 12.3 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 24.5 (18.1–33.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=41 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Generalised anxiety disorder | 36 | 12.8 9.2–17.8ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓ | 12.1 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 27.5 (17.1–44.3) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=29 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Feeling drunk | 177 | 12.3 10.6–14.3ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓ | 12.0 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 31.8 (25.5–39.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=88 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Binge eating | 25 | 12.1 8.1–18.0ROR 12.1 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓ | 11.2 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | – | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 4,743 | 1.8 1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.912 | 1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 9.7 (9.4–10.0) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 1.8 · 72% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 3,231 | 2.1 2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.944 | 2.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 12.2 (11.7–12.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 · 71% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 2,922 | 1.9 1.8–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.918 | 1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 12.8 (12.3–13.4) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 2,674 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.923 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 11.4 (10.9–11.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anxiety | 2,507 | 4.5 4.3–4.7ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.267 | 4.5 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 11.1 (10.6–11.6) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Depression | 2,133 | 4.8 4.6–5.0ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.236 | 4.7 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 11.9 (11.4–12.6) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Feeling abnormal | 2,015 | 4.3 4.1–4.5ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.303 | 4.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 17.6 (16.6–18.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 5.3 · 71% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 1,781 | 1.5 1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.638 | 1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 10.7 (10.2–11.3) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dizziness | 1,761 | 1.8 1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.852 | 1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 11.3 (10.7–11.9) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Somnolence (drowsiness) | 1,717 | 4.4 4.2–4.6ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.294 | 4.3 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 13.2 (12.5–14.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Insomnia (trouble sleeping) | 1,626 | 3.1 3.0–3.3ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.565 | 3.1 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 9.0 (8.6–9.6) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.5 · 73% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 1,492 | 0.9 0.8–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.224 | 0.9 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 3.3 (3.2–3.5) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 0.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vomiting | 1,291 | 1.4 1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.585 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 8.0 (7.5–8.5) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malaise (feeling unwell) | 1,183 | 1.4 1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.562 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 9.1 (8.6–9.7) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.4 · 75% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Condition aggravated | 1,166 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.941 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Central Nervous System Stimulants: PRR 7.2 (6.7–7.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Cataplexy — n=175, PRR 70.9
- Asthma exercise induced — n=25, PRR 39.4
- Periodic limb movement disorder — n=24, PRR 35.3
- Sleep-related eating disorder — n=61, PRR 35.3
- Sleep paralysis — n=94, PRR 34.8
- Manufacturing issue — n=28, PRR 33.3
- Narcolepsy — n=115, PRR 33.0
- Perinatal depression — n=25, PRR 30.2
- Parasomnia — n=37, PRR 28.3
- Abnormal sleep-related event — n=66, PRR 26.6
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Gentamicin Sulfate ↔ Renal Failure.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Dextroamphetamine?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Dextroamphetamine are fatigue, nausea, headache, anxiety, depression, feeling abnormal. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Dextroamphetamine have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION XELSTRYM has a high potential for abuse and misuse, which can lead to the development of a substance use disorder, including addiction. Misuse and abuse of CNS stimulants, including XELST.
Do FAERS signals prove that Dextroamphetamine causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 0862f02a-72a8-41cc-8845-57cf4974bb6f, effective 20251223; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"DEXTROAMPHETAMINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,189 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
DEXTROAMPHETAMINE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.