← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Glipizide side effects: what 60,530 FDA adverse event reports show

Glipizide · 1,178 reaction terms · 218,274 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Sulfonylurea

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

60,530 reports · 56% serious · 5,339 with death outcome · 51% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Glipizide extended-release tablets are indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Glipizide extended-release tablet is a sulfonylurea indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Glipizide extended-release tablets,USP contain glipizide which is an oral sulfonylurea. The

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 25
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,138 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder8931.2
25.1–38.7ROR 31.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=89not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia32425.7
23.0–28.8ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
24.0 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=324not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary16423.9
20.4–28.0ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
22.4 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=163not reported in cached trials
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma7719.6
15.6–24.7ROR 19.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
18.5 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.9 (1.3–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77 · 100% consumerNCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Early satiety9718.5
15.1–22.7ROR 18.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.6 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.6)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy13015.1
12.7–18.0ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.5 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (1.1–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=128 · ♀ 30% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Blood glucose fluctuation44914.7
13.4–16.2ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.1 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.0–1.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=168 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Gastrointestinal hypomotility8714.0
11.3–17.4ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.4 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (0.8–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=85 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Glycosylated haemoglobin abnormal4614.0
10.4–18.8ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.2 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.9)
Lab value / disease marker–not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion11713.7
11.4–16.5ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.1 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=117not reported in cached trials
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased89012.7
11.8–13.5ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.2 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.8–0.9)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 9.2 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease58311.3
10.4–12.3ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
10.9 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2not reported in cached trials
Bladder cancer recurrent3010.7
7.4–15.4ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
9.8 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30not reported in cached trials
Glycosylated haemoglobin decreased4710.5
7.9–14.0ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
9.8 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.8–1.8)
Lab value / disease marker♀ 0% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Medication residue7710.5
8.3–13.1ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
10.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 4.1 (2.5–6.7)
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Impaired gastric emptying37510.5
9.4–11.6ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.1 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.2 · 93% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dilatation atrial339.9
7.0–14.0ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓
9.1 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.7 (0.9–2.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Heart injury709.9
7.8–12.5ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.3 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.1 (1.4–3.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70not reported in cached trials
Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar)1,3329.7
9.2–10.3ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
9.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 9.0NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Adenocarcinoma pancreas359.6
6.9–13.5ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.042 ✓
8.8 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (0.8–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Essential hypertension709.6
7.6–12.2ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.040 ✓
9.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.8 (1.2–2.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=63not reported in cached trials
Left atrial dilatation349.4
6.7–13.2ROR 9.4 · calibrated p 0.046 ✓
8.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.9 (1.1–3.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic739.1
7.2–11.4ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓
8.6 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.8 (0.6–1.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73 · ♀ 29% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Haemorrhagic anaemia1128.9
7.4–10.7ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.049 ✓
8.5 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (1.0–1.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=112 · 72% consumernot reported in cached trials
Diabetic retinopathy848.8
7.0–10.9ROR 8.8 · calibrated p 0.053
8.3 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.7 (0.5–1.0)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=74not reported in cached trials
Blood glucose abnormal4518.6
7.9–9.5ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.052
8.4 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.5 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Diabetic nephropathy528.3
6.3–10.9ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.064
7.7 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.7 (0.5–1.0)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=52NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Coronary artery disease7158.3
7.7–8.9ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.058
8.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.5NCT00856284: 2/869 (0.2%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Chronic kidney disease1,6477.6
7.2–8.0ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.073
7.4 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.7not reported in cached trials
Colonic polyp367.6
5.4–10.5ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.086
6.9 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.8–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diabetic complication557.6
5.8–9.9ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.084
7.1 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=45not reported in cached trials
Hypoglycaemic coma627.6
5.9–9.7ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.083
7.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.2 (0.2–0.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · ♀ 73% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Stomach discomfort1047.0
5.8–8.5ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.101
6.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.7 (1.3–2.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hypertensive heart disease376.9
5.0–9.6ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.110
6.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.6 (1.0–2.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%)not reported in cached trials
Occult blood positive396.9
5.0–9.5ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.111
6.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.4 (1.4–4.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=34 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Glipizide as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (4 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea4,5422.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.987
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6 · 72% consumerNCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,5660.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.264
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.8 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3,3771.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.872
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)3,0431.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.560
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.4NCT00856284: 28/869 (3.2%) on Glipizide
Weight decreased (weight loss)2,8343.5
3.4–3.7ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.445
3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dizziness2,4761.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.804
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,4441.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.654
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6NCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Vomiting2,2491.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.763
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5NCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)2,1322.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.946
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8NCT00856284: 27/869 (3.1%) on Glipizide
Pain2,1021.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.434
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Headache2,0781.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.410
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.1NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Death2,0620.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.197
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.2–1.4)
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.8NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE)
Decreased appetite (loss of appetite)2,0103.0
2.9–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.597
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Glipizide (sulfonylureas) ↔ Hypoglycaemia.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Glipizide?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Glipizide are blood glucose increased, nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, weight decreased, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Glipizide have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Glipizide has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Glipizide causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.