Glipizide side effects: what 60,530 FDA adverse event reports show
Who reports
60,530 reports · 56% serious · 5,339 with death outcome · 51% female
Used for
Glipizide extended-release tablets are indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Glipizide extended-release tablet is a sulfonylurea indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to.
What it is
Glipizide extended-release tablets,USP contain glipizide which is an oral sulfonylurea. The
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,138 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder | 89 | 31.2 25.1–38.7ROR 31.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 28.5 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=89 | not reported in cached trials |
| Nephrogenic anaemia | 324 | 25.7 23.0–28.8ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 24.0 EB05 21.9 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=324 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hyperparathyroidism secondary | 164 | 23.9 20.4–28.0ROR 24.0 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓ | 22.4 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=163 | not reported in cached trials |
| Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | 77 | 19.6 15.6–24.7ROR 19.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 18.5 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.9 (1.3–2.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=77 · 100% consumer | NCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Early satiety | 97 | 18.5 15.1–22.7ROR 18.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 17.6 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.9–1.6) | Not in label — unassessed | 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetic neuropathy | 235 | 17.1 15.0–19.5ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.3 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=215 | not reported in cached trials |
| Blood glucose decreased | 2,243 | 16.9 16.2–17.6ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.1 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 11.3 · 85% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | 130 | 15.1 12.7–18.0ROR 15.2 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 14.5 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (1.1–1.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=128 · ♀ 30% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Blood glucose fluctuation | 449 | 14.7 13.4–16.2ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 14.1 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.0–1.3) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=168 · 82% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Gastrointestinal hypomotility | 87 | 14.0 11.3–17.4ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 13.4 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (0.8–1.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=85 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Glycosylated haemoglobin abnormal | 46 | 14.0 10.4–18.8ROR 14.0 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓ | 13.2 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.9) | Lab value / disease marker | – | not reported in cached trials |
| Rebound acid hypersecretion | 117 | 13.7 11.4–16.5ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓ | 13.1 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=117 | not reported in cached trials |
| Blood glucose increased | 6,710 | 12.7 12.4–13.0ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓ | 12.3 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.1) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.3 · 83% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Glycosylated haemoglobin increased | 890 | 12.7 11.8–13.5ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓ | 12.2 EB05 11.6 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.8–0.9) | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 9.2 · 79% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | 610 | 12.3 11.4–13.4ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓ | 11.9 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 11.5 | not reported in cached trials |
| End stage renal disease | 583 | 11.3 10.4–12.3ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓ | 10.9 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 | not reported in cached trials |
| Bladder cancer recurrent | 30 | 10.7 7.4–15.4ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓ | 9.8 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=30 | not reported in cached trials |
| Glycosylated haemoglobin decreased | 47 | 10.5 7.9–14.0ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓ | 9.8 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.8–1.8) | Lab value / disease marker | ♀ 0% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Medication residue | 77 | 10.5 8.3–13.1ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓ | 10.0 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 4.1 (2.5–6.7) | Not in label — unassessed | – | not reported in cached trials |
| Impaired gastric emptying | 375 | 10.5 9.4–11.6ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓ | 10.1 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.2 · 93% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Dilatation atrial | 33 | 9.9 7.0–14.0ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓ | 9.1 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.7 (0.9–2.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Heart injury | 70 | 9.9 7.8–12.5ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓ | 9.3 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.1 (1.4–3.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=70 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) | 1,332 | 9.7 9.2–10.3ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓ | 9.5 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.5 (0.4–0.5) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 9.0 | NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Adenocarcinoma pancreas | 35 | 9.6 6.9–13.5ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.042 ✓ | 8.8 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (0.8–2.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Essential hypertension | 70 | 9.6 7.6–12.2ROR 9.6 · calibrated p 0.040 ✓ | 9.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.8 (1.2–2.6) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=63 | not reported in cached trials |
| Left atrial dilatation | 34 | 9.4 6.7–13.2ROR 9.4 · calibrated p 0.046 ✓ | 8.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.9 (1.1–3.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic | 73 | 9.1 7.2–11.4ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=73 · ♀ 29% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Haemorrhagic anaemia | 112 | 8.9 7.4–10.7ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.049 ✓ | 8.5 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.4 (1.0–1.8) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=112 · 72% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetic retinopathy | 84 | 8.8 7.0–10.9ROR 8.8 · calibrated p 0.053 | 8.3 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.7 (0.5–1.0) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=74 | not reported in cached trials |
| Blood glucose abnormal | 451 | 8.6 7.9–9.5ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.052 | 8.4 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 6.5 · 77% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetes mellitus non-insulin-dependent | 35 | 8.4 6.0–11.8ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.064 | 7.6 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=34 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 52 | 8.3 6.3–10.9ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.064 | 7.7 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.7 (0.5–1.0) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=52 | NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Coronary artery disease | 715 | 8.3 7.7–8.9ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.058 | 8.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 8.5 | NCT00856284: 2/869 (0.2%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Chronic kidney disease | 1,647 | 7.6 7.2–8.0ROR 7.8 · calibrated p 0.073 | 7.4 EB05 7.1 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (1.1–1.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 7.7 | not reported in cached trials |
| Colonic polyp | 36 | 7.6 5.4–10.5ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.086 | 6.9 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.2 (0.8–2.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Diabetic complication | 55 | 7.6 5.8–9.9ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.084 | 7.1 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.3 (1.4–3.7) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=45 | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypoglycaemic coma | 62 | 7.6 5.9–9.7ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.083 | 7.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=62 · ♀ 73% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Stomach discomfort | 104 | 7.0 5.8–8.5ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.101 | 6.7 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.7 (1.3–2.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypertensive heart disease | 37 | 6.9 5.0–9.6ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.110 | 6.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.6 (1.0–2.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 51%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Occult blood positive | 39 | 6.9 5.0–9.5ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.111 | 6.3 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 2.4 (1.4–4.4) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=34 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Glipizide as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (4 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT00856284 — Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Plus Metformin Compared to Glipizide Plus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 (N=2639, PHASE3; 232 AE terms posted; arms: Metformin + Alogliptin 12.5 mg; Metformin + Alogliptin 25 mg; Metformin + Glipizide)
- NCT00660907 — Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Combination With Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (N=1217, PHASE3; 90 AE terms posted; arms: Dapagliflozin Plus Metformin; Glipizide Plus Metformin)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood glucose increased | 6,710 | 12.7 12.4–13.0ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓ | 12.3 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.1) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 9.3 · 83% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Nausea | 4,542 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.987 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.6 · 72% consumer | NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 3,566 | 0.9 0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.264 | 0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 0.8 · 75% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 3,377 | 1.8 1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.872 | 1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.6 | NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 3,043 | 1.4 1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.560 | 1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.4 | NCT00856284: 28/869 (3.2%) on Glipizide |
| Weight decreased (weight loss) | 2,834 | 3.5 3.4–3.7ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.445 | 3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.1 · 79% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Dizziness | 2,476 | 1.7 1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.804 | 1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.6 | NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 2,444 | 1.5 1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.654 | 1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.6 | NCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Vomiting | 2,249 | 1.7 1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.763 | 1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.5 | NCT00856284: 1/878 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Blood glucose decreased | 2,243 | 16.9 16.2–17.6ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓ | 16.1 EB05 15.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 11.3 · 85% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Asthenia (weakness) | 2,132 | 2.0 1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.946 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.8 | NCT00856284: 27/869 (3.1%) on Glipizide |
| Pain | 2,102 | 1.2 1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.434 | 1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (1.0–1.1) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 1.3 | NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Headache | 2,078 | 1.1 1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.410 | 1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1 vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.1 | NCT00856284: 1/873 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Death | 2,062 | 0.8 0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.197 | 0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.3 (1.2–1.4) | Outcome field, not a reaction | serious PRR 0.8 | NCT00856284: 1/869 (0.1%) on Glipizide (serious AE) |
| Decreased appetite (loss of appetite) | 2,010 | 3.0 2.9–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.597 | 3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 1.9 · 78% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder — n=89, PRR 31.2
- Nephrogenic anaemia — n=324, PRR 25.7
- Hyperparathyroidism secondary — n=164, PRR 23.9
- Bladder transitional cell carcinoma — n=77, PRR 19.6 (also seen in trial arm)
- Early satiety — n=97, PRR 18.5
- Ischaemic cardiomyopathy — n=130, PRR 15.1
- Gastrointestinal hypomotility — n=87, PRR 14.0
- Rebound acid hypersecretion — n=117, PRR 13.7
- End stage renal disease — n=583, PRR 11.3
- Bladder cancer recurrent — n=30, PRR 10.7
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Glipizide (sulfonylureas) ↔ Hypoglycaemia.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Glipizide?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Glipizide are blood glucose increased, nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, weight decreased, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Glipizide have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Glipizide has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Glipizide causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 03151cb5-d32b-4484-8f2a-8c5d24c7f6f1, effective 20260805; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"GLIPIZIDE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,178 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
GLIPIZIDE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.