← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Glyburide side effects: what 24,067 FDA adverse event reports show

Glyburide · 1,179 reaction terms · 103,899 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Sulfonylurea

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

24,067 reports · 63% serious · 2,135 with death outcome · 48% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Glyburide tablets USP are indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Glyburide tablets USP contain glyburide, USP, which is an oral blood-glucose-lowering drug of the sulfonylurea class. Glyburide, USP is a white, crystalline compound.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 3Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 24
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,139 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Blood mercury abnormal41628.8
420.4–940.5ROR 629.9 · calibrated p 5e-14 ✓
310.7 EB05 238.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
5-hydroxyindolacetic acid in urine increased21530.5
307.9–913.8ROR 530.9 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
252.9 EB05 174.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
5-hydroxyindolacetic acid increased20399.5
235.0–678.9ROR 399.8 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
216.7 EB05 148.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Fibrous histiocytoma2668.7
46.1–102.4ROR 68.8 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
61.0 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Poor dental condition2063.4
40.3–99.8ROR 63.4 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
56.1 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Blood follicle stimulating hormone increased2559.0
39.3–88.4ROR 59.0 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
53.1 EB05 37.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=25 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Genital erosion1753.9
33.0–87.9ROR 53.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
48.2 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Low density lipoprotein decreased4528.5
21.2–38.4ROR 28.6 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.4 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder3125.8
18.1–36.9ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
24.8 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 209.6 (157.2–279.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31no trial data cached
Hyperparathyroidism secondary7024.8
19.5–31.4ROR 24.8 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
23.9 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 244.0 (244.0–244.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70no trial data cached
Nephrogenic anaemia12423.7
19.9–28.3ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
23.0 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 213.7 (213.7–213.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=124no trial data cached
Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar)1,20122.1
20.9–23.4ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
21.6 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 358.8 (358.8–358.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.2no trial data cached
Dyspnoea paroxysmal nocturnal1821.8
13.6–34.8ROR 21.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.8 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Early satiety4621.5
16.1–28.8ROR 21.6 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.9 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 308.8 (251.4–379.2)
Not in label — unassessed100% consumerno trial data cached
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy6919.8
15.6–25.2ROR 19.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.3 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 411.0 (369.7–456.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70no trial data cached
Diabetic neuropathy10218.2
15.0–22.1ROR 18.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.8 EB05 15.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 273.9 (273.9–273.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=100no trial data cached
Mucosal erosion1817.6
11.1–28.1ROR 17.6 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.8 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Diabetic retinopathy6216.2
12.6–20.8ROR 16.2 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.8 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 404.1 (351.0–465.3)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=58no trial data cached
Colonic polyp2915.3
10.6–22.1ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.8 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 724.6 (480.2–1,093.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28no trial data cached
Dilatation atrial2015.0
9.6–23.3ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
14.2 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 545.1 (334.5–888.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20no trial data cached
Blood glucose fluctuation18514.9
12.9–17.2ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.6 EB05 12.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 257.6 (257.6–257.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=60 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Diabetic nephropathy3714.8
10.7–20.5ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
14.3 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 387.0 (292.4–512.2)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=37no trial data cached
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery10714.3
11.8–17.3ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
14.0 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 692.4 (692.4–692.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=107 · ♀ 9% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Hepatic neoplasm5214.1
10.7–18.5ROR 14.1 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.7 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52 · ♀ 20% (drug 48%)no trial data cached
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased39013.7
12.4–15.1ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.5 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 227.6 (227.6–227.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 14.9no trial data cached
Sick sinus syndrome1712.9
8.0–20.8ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.7 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Rebound acid hypersecretion4412.7
9.4–17.1ROR 12.7 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓
12.2 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 204.0 (168.2–247.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44no trial data cached
Blood pressure systolic abnormal3512.4
8.9–17.3ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.8 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 48%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Left atrial dilatation1812.4
7.8–19.7ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓
11.2 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 476.2 (287.0–790.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma2012.3
7.9–19.1ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
11.3 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 185.5 (124.0–277.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Coronary artery disease40711.8
10.7–13.0ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.6 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 415.5 (415.5–415.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.8no trial data cached
Heart injury3311.5
8.2–16.3ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.023 ✓
10.9 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 424.0 (308.4–583.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33no trial data cached
Oral intake reduced3211.5
8.1–16.3ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.023 ✓
10.8 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 719.6 (490.9–1,054.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic3711.4
8.3–15.8ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.023 ✓
10.8 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 268.4 (208.0–346.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=37no trial data cached
Carotid artery disease1611.1
6.8–18.1ROR 11.1 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.7 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea2,0372.3
2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.871
2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 266.3 (266.3–266.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Weight decreased (weight loss)1,5424.8
4.6–5.1ROR 5.1 · calibrated p 0.224
4.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 326.4 (326.4–326.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,4260.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.268
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 232.7 (232.7–232.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,3041.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.837
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 208.0 (208.0–208.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Dizziness1,2132.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.959
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 281.8 (281.8–281.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0no trial data cached
Hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar)1,20122.1
20.9–23.4ROR 23.2 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
21.6 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 358.8 (358.8–358.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 20.2no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)1,1531.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.514
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 210.8 (210.8–210.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,0961.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.783
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 260.0 (260.0–260.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)1,0472.4
2.3–2.6ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.815
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 281.1 (281.1–281.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Vomiting1,0411.9
1.8–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.933
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 259.9 (259.9–259.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Pain9521.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.551
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 270.1 (270.1–270.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)8954.5
4.2–4.7ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.285
4.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 381.3 (381.3–381.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1no trial data cached
Decreased appetite (loss of appetite)8933.4
3.2–3.6ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.495
3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Sulfonylureas: PRR 252.7 (252.7–252.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9 · 77% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Glyburide?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Glyburide are blood glucose increased, nausea, weight decreased, diarrhoea, dizziness, hypoglycaemia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Glyburide have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Glyburide has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Glyburide causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.