← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Melatonin side effects: what 54,078 FDA adverse event reports show

Melatonin · 1,166 reaction terms · 236,484 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

54,078 reports · 66% serious · 4,767 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For temporary relief of fatigue, irritability, insomnia, and exhaustion.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 9Lab value / disease marker 3No label text to screen 28
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,126 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Congenital hiatus hernia1601,034.1
767.3–1,393.7ROR 1,037.2 · calibrated p 7e-17 ✓
270.3 EB05 236.9 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=160 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Appendicolith265918.7
735.7–1,147.2ROR 923.2 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
265.0 EB05 239.3 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=265 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy99444.1
332.4–593.4ROR 444.9 · calibrated p 6e-13 ✓
197.9 EB05 167.3 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=99 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy57350.6
244.7–502.3ROR 350.9 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
172.6 EB05 138.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=57 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy100187.8
147.9–238.6ROR 188.2 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
123.3 EB05 104.3 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=100 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma stage 055169.1
123.1–232.3ROR 169.3 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
113.0 EB05 90.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=55 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug therapy94161.5
126.9–205.5ROR 161.7 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
111.2 EB05 93.6 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=94 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy5698.0
73.0–131.4ROR 98.1 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
76.2 EB05 60.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=56 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Victim of child abuse4893.4
68.1–128.0ROR 93.5 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
73.1 EB05 57.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=48 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Child abuse4584.9
61.5–117.3ROR 85.0 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
67.7 EB05 52.7 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Epidural lipomatosis5572.6
54.4–96.8ROR 72.6 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
59.9 EB05 47.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=55 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Malignant melanoma in situ8829.0
23.4–36.0ROR 29.1 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.9 EB05 22.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=88 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hyperphosphataemia14528.4
24.0–33.6ROR 28.5 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.4 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=145 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood phosphorus increased18528.2
24.3–32.7ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.2 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=184 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic3917.2
12.5–23.7ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.3 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site mass4416.6
12.3–22.5ROR 16.6 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.8 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Clostridium test positive8816.3
13.1–20.1ROR 16.3 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.6 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=88 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Stoma site infection4714.6
10.9–19.5ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.9 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge6214.5
11.3–18.7ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.9 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Breath sounds abnormal17714.4
12.4–16.7ROR 14.4 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.9 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=175 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Benign prostatic hyperplasia17913.8
11.9–16.1ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.3 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=179 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Total lung capacity decreased5213.0
9.8–17.1ROR 13.0 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.3 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=50 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicitis29812.8
11.4–14.4ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.4 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 11.1 · ♀ 8% (drug 59%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Stoma site erythema5712.1
9.3–15.8ROR 12.2 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.6 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=47 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Aplastic anaemia15611.9
10.1–13.9ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.4 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=156 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood uric acid increased16311.2
9.6–13.1ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.9 EB05 9.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=161 · ♀ 18% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Stoma site pain4010.9
7.9–14.9ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.028 ✓
10.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Intentional self-injury55010.8
10.0–11.8ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓
10.5 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.3not reported in cached trials
Freezing phenomenon9810.8
8.9–13.2ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
10.4 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=75 · 70% consumernot reported in cached trials
On and off phenomenon14310.8
9.1–12.7ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.4 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=113not reported in cached trials
Stoma site discharge7410.7
8.5–13.5ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.2 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=64 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Iron deficiency11910.6
8.9–12.7ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.2 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=117 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bronchiectasis17710.6
9.1–12.2ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.2 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=177 · ♀ 19% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Myasthenia gravis20110.1
8.8–11.6ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.8 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 8.9 · ♀ 21% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Infusion site haemorrhage8210.0
8.1–12.5ROR 10.0 · calibrated p 0.034 ✓
9.6 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=56 · 100% consumerNCT00668707: 1/356 (0.3%) on Melatonin; 1/353 (0.3%) control
Infusion site pruritus789.9
7.9–12.4ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓
9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=51 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%)NCT01700959: 10/66 (15.2%) on Melatonin; 7/58 (12.1%) control
Infusion site bruising539.9
7.5–13.0ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓
9.3 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis619.9
7.7–12.7ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.036 ✓
9.3 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=60 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aortic stenosis869.8
7.9–12.1ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓
9.3 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=85 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Sedation complication619.7
7.5–12.5ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.039 ✓
9.1 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=59 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Melatonin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (2 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)4,4402.2
2.2–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.889
2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.2NCT01700959: 2/62 (3.2%) on Melatonin; 1/58 (1.7%) control (serious AE)
Nausea3,7621.9
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.897
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1NCT01700959: 1/62 (1.6%) on Melatonin; 2/68 (2.9%) control (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,4311.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.687
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,2070.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.268
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3,0271.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.875
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.7NCT01700959: 1/68 (1.5%) control (serious AE)
Headache2,9701.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.883
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1NCT01700959: 2/62 (3.2%) on Melatonin; 1/58 (1.7%) control (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,5891.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.839
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.7NCT00668707: 1/356 (0.3%) on Melatonin; 1/353 (0.3%) control (serious AE)
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)2,5153.7
3.5–3.8ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.415
3.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.4NCT01700959: 1/66 (1.5%) on Melatonin; 2/68 (2.9%) control (serious AE)
Fall2,4352.9
2.7–3.0ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.647
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.5NCT00668707: 3/356 (0.8%) on Melatonin; 2/353 (0.6%) control
Pain2,3561.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.647
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.5NCT01700959: 1/68 (1.5%) control (serious AE)
Dizziness2,3421.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.867
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.9NCT01700959: 1/68 (1.5%) control (serious AE)
Vomiting2,2341.9
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.881
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.9NCT01700959: 1/62 (1.6%) on Melatonin; 1/68 (1.5%) control (serious AE)
Death2,1641.0
0.9–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.289
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.9NCT00668707: 37/356 (10.4%) on Melatonin; 37/353 (10.5%) control (serious AE)
Somnolence (drowsiness)1,9333.8
3.6–3.9ROR 3.9 · calibrated p 0.406
3.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.3NCT01700959: 1/68 (1.5%) control (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)1,9182.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.953
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Melatonin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Melatonin are fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, headache, dyspnoea, insomnia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Melatonin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Melatonin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Melatonin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.