← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Patiromer side effects: what 13,760 FDA adverse event reports show

Patiromer · Veltassa · 800 reaction terms · 31,577 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Potassium Binder

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Brand names

Veltassa

openFDA label

Who reports

13,760 reports · 49% serious · 2,117 with death outcome · 43% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Veltassa is indicated for the treatment of hyperkalemia in adults and pediatric patients ages 12 years and older. Limitation of Use: Veltassa should not be used as an emergency treatment for life-threatening hyperkalemia because of its delayed onset of action .

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Veltassa is a powder for suspension in water for oral administration. The active ingredient is patiromer sorbitex calcium which consists of the active moiety, patiromer, a non-absorbed potassium-binding polymer, and a calcium-sorbitol counterion.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 16Lab value / disease marker 4Not in label — unassessed 15
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 760 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Dialysis device insertion15250.5
145.0–432.5ROR 250.7 · χ² 2,984 / p <1e-300
169.0 EB05 108.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Arteriovenous fistula operation1695.8
57.8–158.7ROR 95.9 · χ² 1,323 / p 5e-290
81.6 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=15no trial data cached
Blood potassium increased80179.1
73.8–84.8ROR 84.0 · χ² 58,669 / p <1e-300
75.1 EB05 70.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 52.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Blood potassium abnormal8147.9
38.4–59.7ROR 48.1 · χ² 3,557 / p <1e-300
45.9 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=38 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Loss of employment7035.8
28.3–45.4ROR 36.0 · χ² 2,280 / p <1e-300
34.7 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Dialysis32235.3
31.6–39.4ROR 36.1 · χ² 10,453 / p <1e-300
34.4 EB05 31.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 40.9no trial data cached
Product solubility abnormal10733.4
27.6–40.4ROR 33.6 · χ² 3,254 / p <1e-300
32.5 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=18 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Product colour issue10231.3
25.7–38.0ROR 31.5 · χ² 2,901 / p <1e-300
30.5 EB05 25.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11no trial data cached
Faeces hard7128.4
22.4–35.8ROR 28.5 · χ² 1,813 / p <1e-300
27.7 EB05 22.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Renal transplant5624.0
18.4–31.2ROR 24.1 · χ² 1,192 / p 1e-261
23.5 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Product taste abnormal18521.2
18.4–24.5ROR 21.5 · χ² 3,501 / p <1e-300
20.9 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=49no trial data cached
Product difficult to swallow1421.0
12.4–35.6ROR 21.0 · χ² 244 / p 3e-55
20.0 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact–no trial data cached
Constipation2,14315.2
14.6–15.8ROR 17.9 · χ² 28,492 / p <1e-300
15.1 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.6 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Rehabilitation therapy3313.1
9.3–18.5ROR 13.2 · χ² 355 / p 2e-79
12.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=26 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Inhibitory drug interaction1312.5
7.3–21.7ROR 12.6 · χ² 126 / p 2e-29
11.0 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Product physical consistency issue4312.1
8.9–16.3ROR 12.1 · χ² 422 / p 4e-94
11.6 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=8 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Hospice care7211.2
8.9–14.1ROR 11.3 · χ² 655 / p 9e-145
10.9 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.6no trial data cached
Bowel movement irregularity5511.1
8.5–14.4ROR 11.1 · χ² 490 / p 6e-109
10.7 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Catheter placement1310.7
6.2–18.5ROR 10.7 · χ² 104 / p 9e-25
9.0 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Blood magnesium decreased6010.7
8.3–13.7ROR 10.7 · χ² 512 / p 1e-113
10.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.0 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Blood potassium decreased20810.6
9.3–12.1ROR 10.7 · χ² 1,789 / p <1e-300
10.5 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 7.8 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Living in residential institution1310.6
6.1–18.3ROR 10.6 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
8.9 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3no trial data cached
Blood phosphorus increased1810.1
6.4–16.1ROR 10.1 · χ² 138 / p 3e-32
8.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=7no trial data cached
Flatulence (gas)3669.9
9.0–11.0ROR 10.2 · χ² 2,912 / p <1e-300
9.8 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Hospitalisation9749.8
9.2–10.4ROR 10.5 · χ² 7,691 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of drug administration4619.8
8.9–10.7ROR 10.1 · χ² 3,619 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.8 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Faecaloma308.4
5.9–12.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 189 / p 3e-43
7.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 17% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Dyschezia157.6
4.6–12.6ROR 7.6 · χ² 79 / p 3e-19
6.4 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Product physical issue997.6
6.2–9.3ROR 7.6 · χ² 559 / p 8e-124
7.4 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=28no trial data cached
Cardiac operation427.6
5.6–10.2ROR 7.6 · χ² 232 / p 1e-52
7.1 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Product dose omission3217.4
6.7–8.3ROR 7.6 · χ² 1,773 / p <1e-300
7.3 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.4 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Hepatic steatosis907.4
6.0–9.1ROR 7.4 · χ² 490 / p 7e-109
7.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Leg amputation197.0
4.5–11.0ROR 7.0 · χ² 92 / p 5e-22
6.1 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Toe amputation236.9
4.6–10.4ROR 6.9 · χ² 109 / p 6e-26
6.1 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 13% (drug 43%) · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Blood calcium increased386.6
4.8–9.1ROR 6.6 · χ² 175 / p 3e-40
6.2 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=13no trial data cached
Drug dose omission6726.1
5.7–6.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 2,890 / p <1e-300
6.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Hyperparathyroidism secondary106.0
3.2–11.2ROR 6.0 · χ² 37 / p 6e-10
4.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Blood creatinine decreased115.4
3.0–9.7ROR 5.4 · χ² 35 / p 2e-9
4.5 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2no trial data cached
Treatment noncompliance1815.1
4.4–5.9ROR 5.1 · χ² 590 / p 1e-130
5.0 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.5no trial data cached
Drug administration error1035.1
4.2–6.1ROR 5.1 · χ² 330 / p 4e-74
4.9 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.0 · 89% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Constipation2,14315.2
14.6–15.8ROR 17.9 · χ² 28,492 / p <1e-300
15.1 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.6 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Death1,8233.2
3.1–3.4ROR 3.6 · χ² 2,919 / p <1e-300
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 3.8no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,2943.1
2.9–3.2ROR 3.3 · χ² 1,857 / p <1e-300
3.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Hospitalisation9749.8
9.2–10.4ROR 10.5 · χ² 7,691 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 9.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.7no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)9301.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.7 · χ² 238 / p 7e-54
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Blood potassium increased80179.1
73.8–84.8ROR 84.0 · χ² 58,669 / p <1e-300
75.1 EB05 70.8 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 52.0 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Nausea7091.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 73 / p 6e-18
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1 · ♀ 64% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Drug dose omission6726.1
5.7–6.6ROR 6.4 · χ² 2,890 / p <1e-300
6.1 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 9.1no trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)5822.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 304 / p 2e-68
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Abdominal discomfort5414.9
4.6–5.4ROR 5.1 · χ² 1,707 / p <1e-300
4.9 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Inappropriate schedule of drug administration4619.8
8.9–10.7ROR 10.1 · χ² 3,619 / p <1e-300
9.7 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.8 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Vomiting4471.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 64 / p 6e-16
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.8 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Abdominal pain upper4263.2
2.9–3.5ROR 3.2 · χ² 633 / p 5e-140
3.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
No adverse event3773.2
2.9–3.6ROR 3.3 · χ² 587 / p 7e-130
3.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact75% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3731.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.472
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Patiromer?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Patiromer are constipation, diarrhoea, blood potassium increased, nausea, malaise, abdominal discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Patiromer have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Patiromer has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Patiromer causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.