← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amlodipine and Valsartan side effects: what 11,004 FDA adverse event reports show

Amlodipine Besylate And Valsartan · 1,070 reaction terms · 36,127 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcium channel blocker and may be

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Amlodipine (Katerzia)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

11,004 reports · 86% serious · 1,268 with death outcome · 54% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

KATERZIA is a calcium channel blocker and may be used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive and antianginal agents for the treatment of: Hypertension ( 1.1 ) KATERZIA is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in adults and children 6 years and older, to lower blood pressure.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

KATERZIA oral suspension contains 1.30 mg/mL amlodipine benzoate, equivalent to 1 mg/mL amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker. Amlodipine benzoate is chemically described as 3-Ethy.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 8Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 30
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,030 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Papillary renal cell carcinoma12183.4
101.4–331.6ROR 183.6 · χ² 1,820 / p <1e-300
132.5 EB05 80.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Blood pressure inadequately controlled15951.3
43.9–60.0ROR 52.0 · χ² 7,586 / p <1e-300
49.7 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=149 · 71% consumerno trial data cached
Protein-losing gastroenteropathy1143.7
24.0–79.4ROR 43.8 · χ² 408 / p 5e-91
40.0 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Senile dementia1338.2
22.1–66.2ROR 38.3 · χ² 426 / p 5e-95
35.7 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Infarction12134.0
28.4–40.6ROR 34.3 · χ² 3,771 / p <1e-300
33.2 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 22.4 · 93% consumerno trial data cached
Hypocoagulable state1427.6
16.3–46.8ROR 27.6 · χ² 328 / p 1e-73
26.3 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Microalbuminuria1025.4
13.6–47.3ROR 25.4 · χ² 207 / p 2e-47
23.8 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy1117.1
9.4–30.9ROR 17.1 · χ² 149 / p 1e-34
15.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Aortic valve stenosis1212.9
7.3–22.7ROR 12.9 · χ² 119 / p 6e-28
11.2 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy1112.3
6.8–22.3ROR 12.3 · χ² 103 / p 2e-24
10.4 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Nephrogenic anaemia3012.3
8.6–17.6ROR 12.3 · χ² 298 / p 4e-67
11.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30no trial data cached
Hyperparathyroidism secondary1612.1
7.4–19.8ROR 12.1 · χ² 151 / p 5e-35
10.9 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Walking disability1311.9
6.9–20.5ROR 11.9 · χ² 118 / p 8e-28
10.3 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Arterial occlusive disease4811.6
8.8–15.5ROR 11.7 · χ² 454 / p 6e-101
11.3 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Linear iga disease1011.5
6.2–21.4ROR 11.5 · χ² 85 / p 1e-20
9.4 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Lipoma1511.1
6.7–18.4ROR 11.1 · χ² 127 / p 8e-30
9.7 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15no trial data cached
Maculopathy2010.7
6.9–16.6ROR 10.7 · χ² 166 / p 3e-38
9.7 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 80% (drug 54%) · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Aortic arteriosclerosis139.6
5.6–16.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 92 / p 5e-22
8.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Blood pressure abnormal979.4
7.7–11.4ROR 9.4 · χ² 714 / p 1e-157
9.1 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 8.2 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Dengue fever119.1
5.1–16.5ROR 9.1 · χ² 71 / p 1e-17
7.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Renal neoplasm109.0
4.8–16.7ROR 9.0 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
7.0 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Diabetes mellitus3528.8
7.9–9.7ROR 9.1 · χ² 2,422 / p <1e-300
8.7 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.2 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure fluctuation1098.7
7.2–10.4ROR 8.7 · χ² 729 / p 8e-161
8.4 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 6.6 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Diabetic nephropathy108.6
4.6–16.1ROR 8.6 · χ² 60 / p 5e-15
6.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=10no trial data cached
Hypertensive crisis508.6
6.5–11.3ROR 8.6 · χ² 325 / p 5e-73
8.1 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 5.7no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal motility disorder238.3
5.5–12.5ROR 8.3 · χ² 140 / p 1e-32
7.4 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 100% (drug 54%) · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Blood pressure increased6608.2
7.7–8.9ROR 8.7 · χ² 4,204 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 7.4 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Deafness1118.1
6.7–9.8ROR 8.2 · χ² 682 / p 1e-150
7.9 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.6 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Erysipelas218.0
5.2–12.2ROR 8.0 · χ² 120 / p 3e-28
7.0 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21no trial data cached
Overweight227.8
5.2–11.9ROR 7.9 · χ² 124 / p 4e-29
6.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21no trial data cached
Asphyxia337.7
5.5–10.9ROR 7.7 · χ² 186 / p 1e-42
7.1 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.2 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Hyperuricaemia167.5
4.6–12.2ROR 7.5 · χ² 83 / p 4e-20
6.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Blood cholesterol abnormal177.0
4.4–11.3ROR 7.0 · χ² 82 / p 8e-20
6.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=16no trial data cached
Chondropathy107.0
3.8–13.0ROR 7.0 · χ² 45 / p 8e-12
5.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Subdural haemorrhage106.9
3.7–12.9ROR 6.9 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
5.5 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Tibia fracture176.9
4.3–11.1ROR 6.9 · χ² 80 / p 2e-19
5.9 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
Cerebral haematoma126.8
3.9–12.0ROR 6.8 · χ² 54 / p 1e-13
5.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Venous thrombosis146.8
4.0–11.5ROR 6.8 · χ² 63 / p 9e-16
5.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Blood pressure diastolic decreased266.7
4.6–9.8ROR 6.7 · χ² 120 / p 3e-28
6.0 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 4.5no trial data cached
Fibula fracture106.6
3.5–12.3ROR 6.6 · χ² 42 / p 5e-11
5.2 EB05 3.0 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Blood pressure increased6608.2
7.7–8.9ROR 8.7 · χ² 4,204 / p <1e-300
8.2 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 7.4 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)5875.3
4.9–5.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 2,052 / p <1e-300
5.3 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 4.2 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5480.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 31 / p 1e-8
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.5
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Dizziness4901.9
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 204 / p 1e-46
1.9 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Death4691.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 1 / p 0.213
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)4692.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 251 / p 1e-56
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)4431.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 3 / p 0.039
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Fall4302.5
2.2–2.7ROR 2.5 · χ² 379 / p 1e-84
2.5 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9no trial data cached
Headache3981.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 15 / p 6e-5
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3641.2
1.1–1.4ROR 1.2 · χ² 15 / p 4e-5
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.0no trial data cached
Diabetes mellitus3528.8
7.9–9.7ROR 9.1 · χ² 2,422 / p <1e-300
8.7 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.2 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Cerebrovascular accident (stroke)3433.8
3.5–4.3ROR 3.9 · χ² 725 / p 5e-160
3.8 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3411.0
0.9–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 0 / p 0.435
1.0 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.9no trial data cached
Nausea3200.8
0.7–0.9ROR 0.8 · χ² 22 / p 1e-6
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.6
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Amlodipine (dihydropyridine CCBs) ↔ Peripheral oedema.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amlodipine and Valsartan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amlodipine and Valsartan are blood pressure increased, hypertension, dizziness, malaise, fatigue, fall. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amlodipine and Valsartan have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Amlodipine and Valsartan has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amlodipine and Valsartan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.