← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Irbesartan side effects: what 44,394 FDA adverse event reports show

Irbesartan · 1,179 reaction terms · 181,121 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

44,394 reports · 78% serious · 3,301 with death outcome · 57% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Irbesartan tablets are angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) indicated for: Treatment of hypertension, to lower blood pressure. Lowering blood pressure reduces the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions. (1.1) Treatment of diabetic nephropathy in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, an elevated serum creatinine, and proteinuria.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Irbesartan, USP is an angiotensin II receptor (AT 1 subtype) antagonist. Irbesartan, USP is a non-peptide compound, chemically described as a 2-butyl-3-[ p -( o -1 H -tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]-1,3-diazaspiro[4.4]non-1-en-4-one.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

FETAL TOXICITY • When pregnancy is detected, discontinue irbesartan tablets as soon as possible [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ]. • Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ].

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Likely indication confounding 7Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,139 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Amyloid arthropathy595,487.1
2,202.3–13,671.0ROR 5,494.4 · calibrated p 8e-20 ✓
376.9 EB05 302.9 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neurologic neglect syndrome293524.0
443.6–619.1ROR 527.5 · calibrated p 5e-14 ✓
243.0 EB05 220.5 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 15.7 (13.1–18.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=293 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Radiation inflammation39442.3
285.4–685.6ROR 442.7 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
204.5 EB05 156.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Carotid artery thrombosis303260.9
226.7–300.2ROR 262.7 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
165.8 EB05 150.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 16.0 (13.3–19.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=303 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction70173.1
131.6–227.8ROR 173.4 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
122.3 EB05 100.1 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder291135.7
119.1–154.6ROR 136.6 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
104.6 EB05 94.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 16.0 (13.3–19.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=291 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,062 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Central nervous system lupus42113.5
81.0–159.1ROR 113.7 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
87.9 EB05 67.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Body mass index abnormal42105.0
75.1–146.7ROR 105.1 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
82.7 EB05 63.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Gastrointestinal procedural complication3572.0
50.4–102.8ROR 72.1 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.5 EB05 45.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Personality disorder30461.5
54.6–69.3ROR 61.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
54.3 EB05 49.3 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 16.3 (13.6–19.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=303 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,064 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Serositis4339.9
29.2–54.5ROR 39.9 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
36.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Blood pressure systolic abnormal16533.5
28.6–39.2ROR 33.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
31.2 EB05 27.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 8.6 (7.0–10.6)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=162 · ♀ 88% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Blood pressure diastolic abnormal15329.8
25.3–35.1ROR 29.9 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
28.0 EB05 24.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 12.8 (10.0–16.2)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=152 · ♀ 88% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Pulmonary pain12421.3
17.8–25.5ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.3 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=121not reported in cached trials
Hemiplegia33819.9
17.8–22.2ROR 20.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.1 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.7 (6.7–8.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.3 · ♀ 94% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 2/2,062 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Sensory loss32619.8
17.8–22.1ROR 20.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.0 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 13.6 (11.5–16.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,062 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Seronegative arthritis3917.0
12.3–23.3ROR 17.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.2 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Left atrial dilatation4215.9
11.7–21.7ROR 15.9 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
15.3 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 11.0 (7.1–17.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Gangrene19815.9
13.8–18.3ROR 16.0 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.4 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 8.1 (6.7–9.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=198 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%) · 92% clinicianNCT00249795: 2/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan; 3/4,498 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Affect lability31115.7
14.0–17.5ROR 15.8 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
15.2 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 11.8 (10.0–13.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Motor dysfunction31515.1
13.5–16.9ROR 15.3 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
14.7 EB05 13.4 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 9.4 (8.1–11.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,064 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Carotid arteriosclerosis3014.2
9.9–20.4ROR 14.2 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.5 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.8 (1.9–4.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Arterial occlusive disease22413.8
12.0–15.7ROR 13.8 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
13.4 EB05 11.9 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 3.7 (3.1–4.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.3 · ♀ 94% (drug 57%)NCT00249795: 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Muscle spasticity34113.3
12.0–14.8ROR 13.4 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
13.0 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 9.0 (7.8–10.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.6 · ♀ 91% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Lupus nephritis4712.4
9.3–16.5ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.8 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Haematoma muscle3012.3
8.6–17.7ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
11.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Blood pressure systolic increased48311.9
10.9–13.0ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
11.6 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 3.2 (2.9–3.5)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 9.0not reported in cached trials
Coordination abnormal33011.3
10.2–12.6ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
11.0 EB05 10.1 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.8 (6.8–9.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.3 · ♀ 93% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,064 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Tachyarrhythmia5811.2
8.6–14.5ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.024 ✓
10.7 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 3.6 (2.7–4.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=58 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 2/2,064 (0.1%) on Irbesartan; 2/2,062 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Hyperparathyroidism secondary5710.9
8.3–14.1ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
10.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.8 (1.3–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=57NCT00249795: 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Hemiparesis37910.7
9.7–11.9ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.5 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.0 (6.2–8.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4 · ♀ 88% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 2/2,062 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Wrong patient received product6210.4
8.1–13.4ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
9.9 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=61 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Conduction disorder3910.3
7.5–14.1ROR 10.3 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
9.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%)NCT00095238: 1/2,064 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Blood pressure diastolic decreased1519.8
8.3–11.5ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓
9.5 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.4 (2.0–2.9)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 7.4 · ♀ 91% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Blood pressure inadequately controlled1229.7
8.1–11.6ROR 9.7 · calibrated p 0.037 ✓
9.3 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=85not reported in cached trials
Hyperkalaemia (high potassium)7009.6
9.0–10.4ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.035 ✓
9.4 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.3 (2.1–2.5)
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 6.9NCT00249795: 5/4,518 (0.1%) on Irbesartan; 4/4,498 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Sinus congestion2679.5
8.4–10.7ROR 9.5 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓
9.2 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 5.6 (4.8–6.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=260 · ♀ 100% (drug 57%)not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia929.5
7.7–11.6ROR 9.5 · calibrated p 0.041 ✓
9.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.3 (1.1–1.7)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=92NCT00249795: 1/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Lipoma488.9
6.7–11.8ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.052
8.3 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 0% (drug 57%) · 100% clinicianNCT00249795: 1/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan; 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Hyperlactacidaemia488.7
6.6–11.6ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.055
8.2 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 30.9 (17.3–55.2)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=48 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Irbesartan as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (15 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)2,5471.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.696
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.3 (1.3–1.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7NCT00095238: 4/2,064 (0.2%) on Irbesartan; 3/2,062 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Nausea2,4861.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.654
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6NCT00249795: 2/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan; 2/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)2,3381.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.805
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.0 (1.9–2.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7NCT00249795: 1/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan (serious AE)
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,2040.8
0.8–0.8ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.172
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.0not reported in cached trials
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)2,1516.8
6.5–7.0ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.097
6.7 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.6 (2.5–2.7)
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 4.9 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dizziness2,0321.9
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.931
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 1.8NCT00249795: 8/4,518 (0.2%) on Irbesartan; 11/4,498 (0.2%) control (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)2,0251.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.785
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.1 (1.0–1.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5NCT00249795: 3/4,518 (0.1%) on Irbesartan; 4/4,498 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Fall2,0052.9
2.7–3.0ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.644
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.4NCT00249795: 26/4,518 (0.6%) on Irbesartan; 24/4,498 (0.5%) control (serious AE)
Headache1,9421.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.633
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.9 (1.8–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7NCT00249795: 1/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan; 3/4,498 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)1,7442.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.930
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0NCT00249795: 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,7390.9
0.9–1.0ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.271
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,6771.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.851
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0NCT00249795: 1/4,518 (0.0%) on Irbesartan; 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)
Pain1,5711.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.450
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.8 (1.7–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.2NCT00249795: 8/4,518 (0.2%) on Irbesartan; 7/4,498 (0.2%) control (serious AE)
Vomiting1,5711.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.710
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 2.3 (2.1–2.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6NCT00249795: 6/4,518 (0.1%) on Irbesartan; 5/4,498 (0.1%) control (serious AE)
Blood pressure increased1,5264.7
4.5–5.0ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.249
4.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 1.7 (1.7–1.8)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 4.0NCT00249795: 1/4,498 (0.0%) control (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Irbesartan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Irbesartan are fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, acute kidney injury, dizziness, dyspnoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Irbesartan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: FETAL TOXICITY • When pregnancy is detected, discontinue irbesartan tablets as soon as possible [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ]. • Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Use in Specific Populations (8.1) ].

Do FAERS signals prove that Irbesartan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.