← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Psyllium Husk side effects: what 9,815 FDA adverse event reports show

Psyllium Husk · Dr. Fibra · 1,093 reaction terms · 53,986 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Dr. Fibra

openFDA label

Who reports

9,815 reports · 61% serious · 770 with death outcome · 58% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For relief of occasional constipation (irregularity). This product generally produces bowel movement in 12 to 72 hours.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 7Lab value / disease marker 4No label text to screen 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,053 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Salpingo-oophorectomy unilateral28727.9
473.9–1,118.1ROR 730.0 · χ² 14,569 / p <1e-300
394.8 EB05 286.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Appendicolith40251.4
181.3–348.8ROR 252.5 · χ² 8,691 / p <1e-300
203.0 EB05 155.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=40 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Antacid therapy11214.5
115.4–398.7ROR 214.7 · χ² 1,932 / p <1e-300
146.0 EB05 87.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy16200.5
120.1–334.8ROR 200.9 · χ² 2,721 / p <1e-300
150.6 EB05 98.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy18133.0
82.6–214.1ROR 133.2 · χ² 2,096 / p <1e-300
110.8 EB05 74.1 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=18not reported in cached trials
Drug therapy17119.7
73.5–195.1ROR 119.9 · χ² 1,783 / p <1e-300
100.8 EB05 66.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Temperature regulation disorder113116.4
96.4–140.5ROR 117.8 · χ² 12,145 / p <1e-300
108.4 EB05 92.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=113 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Venous pressure jugular increased17103.5
63.6–168.3ROR 103.6 · χ² 1,548 / p <1e-300
89.1 EB05 58.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=17not reported in cached trials
Anticoagulant therapy1188.1
48.2–160.9ROR 88.2 · χ² 827 / p 3e-182
74.1 EB05 44.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Sinusitis fungal2981.5
56.3–118.1ROR 81.8 · χ² 2,144 / p <1e-300
74.8 EB05 54.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=29 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Food allergy18954.8
47.5–63.2ROR 55.8 · χ² 9,675 / p <1e-300
53.1 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=189 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Multiple drug therapy1546.9
28.1–78.1ROR 46.9 · χ² 615 / p 6e-136
43.5 EB05 28.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Foetal death11146.7
38.7–56.3ROR 47.2 · χ² 4,812 / p <1e-300
45.4 EB05 38.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=111 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Female genital tract fistula3544.3
31.7–61.9ROR 44.4 · χ² 1,409 / p <1e-300
42.5 EB05 31.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Hyperphosphataemia3636.9
26.5–51.2ROR 37.0 · χ² 1,200 / p 3e-263
35.6 EB05 26.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rectal prolapse2036.0
23.1–55.9ROR 36.0 · χ² 635 / p 3e-140
34.3 EB05 23.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Sputum increased3434.9
24.9–48.9ROR 35.0 · χ² 1,067 / p 3e-234
33.7 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Blood phosphorus increased4031.8
23.3–43.4ROR 31.9 · χ² 1,145 / p 3e-251
30.9 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=40 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance increased1131.7
17.5–57.5ROR 31.7 · χ² 293 / p 7e-66
29.7 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=11not reported in cached trials
Respiratory symptom4030.9
22.6–42.2ROR 31.0 · χ² 1,112 / p 4e-244
30.1 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=40 · ♀ 83% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Sedation complication3429.4
21.0–41.2ROR 29.5 · χ² 893 / p 2e-196
28.6 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Kyphosis2429.3
19.6–43.8ROR 29.3 · χ² 619 / p 7e-137
28.3 EB05 20.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Immunodeficiency19328.3
24.6–32.6ROR 28.9 · χ² 4,998 / p <1e-300
27.9 EB05 24.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 28.5 · ♀ 98% (drug 58%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Diastolic dysfunction3725.8
18.6–35.6ROR 25.9 · χ² 846 / p 3e-186
25.2 EB05 19.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=37 · ♀ 91% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Embolism venous3424.2
17.2–33.9ROR 24.3 · χ² 724 / p 9e-160
23.6 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic1023.5
12.6–43.9ROR 23.6 · χ² 192 / p 7e-44
22.1 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10not reported in cached trials
Pleural fibrosis1123.0
12.7–41.7ROR 23.1 · χ² 208 / p 2e-47
21.8 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11not reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance decreased4121.9
16.1–29.8ROR 22.0 · χ² 790 / p 3e-174
21.5 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Faeces hard3720.5
14.9–28.4ROR 20.6 · χ² 662 / p 4e-146
20.1 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Prescribed overdose18320.4
17.6–23.5ROR 20.7 · χ² 3,323 / p <1e-300
20.1 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 31.4 · ♀ 95% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Osteosclerosis1419.1
11.3–32.3ROR 19.1 · χ² 220 / p 4e-50
18.2 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=14not reported in cached trials
Coeliac disease8719.1
15.5–23.5ROR 19.2 · χ² 1,460 / p <1e-300
18.8 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 22.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Iron deficiency3818.4
13.4–25.3ROR 18.5 · χ² 603 / p 2e-133
18.1 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Chronic sinusitis3117.8
12.5–25.3ROR 17.9 · χ² 471 / p 1e-104
17.4 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Bursitis9817.5
14.3–21.3ROR 17.6 · χ² 1,494 / p <1e-300
17.3 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 19.2 · ♀ 93% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Left atrial dilatation1016.7
9.0–31.2ROR 16.8 · χ² 132 / p 9e-31
15.1 EB05 7.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10not reported in cached trials
Diverticulum5616.7
12.9–21.7ROR 16.8 · χ² 806 / p 2e-177
16.5 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=49 · ♀ 89% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal polyps3616.0
11.6–22.3ROR 16.1 · χ² 489 / p 1e-108
15.7 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 58%)not reported in cached trials
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome1015.4
8.3–28.7ROR 15.4 · χ² 120 / p 4e-28
13.6 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=9not reported in cached trials
Blood uric acid increased4115.3
11.2–20.8ROR 15.3 · χ² 529 / p 2e-117
15.0 EB05 11.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=37 · ♀ 0% (drug 58%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Psyllium Husk as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)1,0692.9
2.8–3.1ROR 3.2 · χ² 1,418 / p <1e-300
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.4not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,0233.4
3.2–3.6ROR 3.7 · χ² 1,782 / p <1e-300
3.4 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1NCT00727649: 4/34 (11.8%) on Psyllium Husk
Constipation8888.8
8.3–9.4ROR 9.6 · χ² 6,163 / p <1e-300
8.7 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 9.4NCT00727649: 3/34 (8.8%) on Psyllium Husk
Off label use (used outside approved label)8192.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 436 / p 4e-97
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Nausea7242.0
1.8–2.1ROR 2.0 · χ² 352 / p 6e-79
2.0 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials
Headache7012.4
2.2–2.6ROR 2.5 · χ² 583 / p 4e-129
2.4 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.4NCT00727649: 1/34 (2.9%) on Psyllium Husk
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)6741.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · χ² 6 / p 0.009
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Pain6662.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 509 / p 5e-113
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.8NCT00727649: 2/34 (5.9%) on Psyllium Husk
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5782.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.3 · χ² 379 / p 9e-85
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)5062.9
2.6–3.1ROR 3.0 · χ² 627 / p 9e-139
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.9not reported in cached trials
Dizziness4892.1
1.9–2.3ROR 2.2 · χ² 286 / p 1e-64
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Rash4582.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.3 · χ² 326 / p 4e-73
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Fall4522.9
2.7–3.2ROR 3.0 · χ² 571 / p 2e-126
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.9not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)4142.1
1.9–2.3ROR 2.2 · χ² 253 / p 3e-57
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.5not reported in cached trials
Weight decreased (weight loss)4143.2
2.9–3.5ROR 3.3 · χ² 620 / p 3e-137
3.2 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.4not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Psyllium Husk?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Psyllium Husk are fatigue, diarrhoea, constipation, nausea, headache, pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Psyllium Husk have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Psyllium Husk has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Psyllium Husk causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.