← All comparisons
Head-to-head · FAERS comparison

Etanercept vs Secukinumab: side effects in FDA adverse event reports

How to read this page. FAERS report counts have no denominator; the comparison is of reporting patterns, not of risk. Signals are screened against each FDA label (badges) but not causally assessed. Not medical advice.

At a glance

EtanerceptSecukinumab
Drug classTumor Necrosis Factor BlockerInterleukin-17A Antagonist
Brand namesEnbrelCosentyx
FAERS reports595,118160,389
Serious36%40%
Death outcome17,1548,611
Boxed warningYes SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCIES WARNING: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCIES See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. SERIOUS INFECTIONSNo

Signals both drugs share

ReactionEtanerceptSecukinumabLabel screen (A / B)
Synovitis11,207 · PRR 57.34,134 · PRR 38.7Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Pemphigus8,412 · PRR 73.63,846 · PRR 58.4Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Hand deformity8,536 · PRR 65.93,628 · PRR 50.0Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Helicobacter infection4,820 · PRR 31.13,048 · PRR 55.6Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Duodenal ulcer perforation4,537 · PRR 56.63,024 · PRR 91.7Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Folliculitis4,400 · PRR 25.63,017 · PRR 53.8Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Muscle injury3,852 · PRR 30.62,384 · PRR 53.4Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Rheumatic fever2,908 · PRR 69.92,562 · PRR 187.4Likely indication confounding / Not in label — unassessed
Facet joint syndrome1,651 · PRR 38.21,958 · PRR 217.2Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Bone erosion1,731 · PRR 33.1806 · PRR 38.3Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative1,212 · PRR 56.51,207 · PRR 211.9Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Dislocation of vertebra1,027 · PRR 29.71,022 · PRR 111.4Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood976 · PRR 32.5943 · PRR 115.3Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Lupus vulgaris662 · PRR 43.6726 · PRR 207.0Not in label — unassessed / Not in label — unassessed
Seronegative arthritis444 · PRR 22.6346 · PRR 58.1Likely indication confounding / Likely indication confounding

Labeled signals distinctive to Etanercept

Labeled signals distinctive to Secukinumab

  • None stood out among the strongest labeled signals.

Common questions

Which has more reported side effects, Etanercept or Secukinumab?

Etanercept has 595,118 FAERS reports and Secukinumab 160,389. More reports does not mean more dangerous: volume follows how widely and how long a drug has been used, prescription vs over-the-counter status, and publicity. The seriousness share (36% vs 40%) is a better like-for-like signal of the kind of problems reported.

Which side effects do Etanercept and Secukinumab share?

Both drugs carry disproportionality signals for synovitis, pemphigus, hand deformity, helicobacter infection, duodenal ulcer perforation. Shared signals often reflect a shared drug class or the condition both are used for.

Is Etanercept or Secukinumab safer?

FAERS cannot answer that: it has no denominator and no comparator. Use this page to see which risks are already on each label and which signals are unlabeled, then check the prescribing information and your clinician for your situation.

Sources: openFDA FAERS pair statistics (OpenPV build 2026-09-14), FDA labels via openFDA, openFDA count queries for seriousness and deaths. Pair chosen because it is a commonly searched comparison. Generated 2026-10-08.