← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Epinephrine side effects: what 65,037 FDA adverse event reports show

Epinephrine · 1,230 reaction terms · 274,261 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

alpha-Adrenergic Agonist, beta-Adrenergic Agonist, Catecholamine

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

65,037 reports · 57% serious · 4,076 with death outcome · 67% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Epinephrine is a non-selective alpha and beta adrenergic agonist indicated: • To increase mean arterial blood pressure in adult patients with hypotension associated with septic shock. ( 1.1 ) • For emergency treatment of allergic reactions (Type 1), including anaphylaxis. ( 1.2 ) • For induction and maintenance of mydriasis during intraocular surgery.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Epinephrine Injection USP, 1 mg/mL is supplied as a sterile aqueous solution with a pH range of 2.2 to 5.0, that is colorless and nonpyrogenic. Each milliliter contains 1 mg epinephrine, sodiu.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 17Likely indication confounding 7Reporting / coding artifact 5Not in label — unassessed 10
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,190 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
No device malfunction6019,013.4
2,635.0–137,193.6ROR 19,030.9 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
284.3 EB05 228.9 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: only this drug
Not in label — unassessed♀ 0% (drug 67%) · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Injection site pallor127212.9
170.1–266.6ROR 213.4 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
125.4 EB05 108.1 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: only this drug
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=53no trial arm names this drug
Vascular access site complication95204.8
158.2–265.0ROR 205.1 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
121.8 EB05 102.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (5.5–9.6)
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Coagulation factor deficiency39102.1
71.2–146.5ROR 102.2 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
74.8 EB05 57.1 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (4.7–11.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 0% (drug 67%) · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Infusion site pruritus45054.3
49.1–60.0ROR 54.7 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
46.4 EB05 42.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.7 (7.6–10.0)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=297no trial arm names this drug
Infusion site urticaria9151.6
41.3–64.4ROR 51.7 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
44.1 EB05 37.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.9 (6.6–12.1)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=60 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)no trial arm names this drug
Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity14251.1
42.8–61.0ROR 51.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
43.9 EB05 38.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (5.8–9.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=142 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Lagophthalmos5549.8
37.5–66.2ROR 49.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
42.6 EB05 33.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (5.0–10.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hereditary angioedema1,38749.0
46.3–51.8ROR 50.0 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
42.5 EB05 40.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 9.5 (8.8–10.3)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 40.1no trial arm names this drug
Infusion site swelling65338.2
35.2–41.4ROR 38.5 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
34.1 EB05 32.0 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.8 (7.8–9.8)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=408no trial arm names this drug
Accidental exposure38932.6
29.4–36.2ROR 32.8 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.6 EB05 27.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=99no trial arm names this drug
Steroid dependence7832.5
25.7–41.0ROR 32.5 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.4 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (5.3–9.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 0% (drug 67%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Liquid product physical issue64632.4
29.9–35.1ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.4 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 11.2 (9.9–12.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43no trial arm names this drug
Toxic anterior segment syndrome9731.4
25.5–38.7ROR 31.5 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 24.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.0 (6.0–10.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Device failure1,33831.1
29.4–32.9ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
28.4 EB05 27.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 29.2 (26.0–33.0)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 19.6 · serious PRR 44.9no trial arm names this drug
Allergy to plants4030.9
22.3–42.8ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.9 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.5 (5.4–13.5)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Catarrh7830.9
24.5–39.0ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
28.1 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.3 (5.3–9.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=78 · ♀ 0% (drug 67%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Multiple allergies63328.2
26.0–30.6ROR 28.5 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.6 (6.8–8.5)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=579 · 77% consumerno trial arm names this drug
Maternal exposure during delivery7225.7
20.2–32.7ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓
23.7 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.6 (5.4–10.5)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=66 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic6624.9
19.4–32.0ROR 25.0 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
23.1 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.5 (5.3–10.6)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=66 · ♀ 0% (drug 67%)no trial arm names this drug
Stress cardiomyopathy39123.3
21.0–25.8ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
21.7 EB05 20.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.1 (7.0–9.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=389 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Incorrect drug administration rate27622.4
19.9–25.4ROR 22.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
21.0 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.6 (6.4–8.9)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=217no trial arm names this drug
Mast cell activation syndrome8622.3
17.9–27.8ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.8 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 12.0 (8.5–16.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=84 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)no trial arm names this drug

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Anaphylaxis / angioedema2,3096.05.8–6.3signal
Serious infection5,9202.52.4–2.5signal
Opportunistic infection8372.01.9–2.1raised
Arrhythmia / qt1,1551.91.8–2.0raised
Fall / fracture2,0171.71.6–1.8raised
Venous thromboembolism9241.41.3–1.5raised
Seizure7861.31.2–1.4raised
Kidney injury1,6681.21.1–1.2raised
Depression9801.11.1–1.2raised
Heart failure5210.90.9–1.0no difference
Myocardial infarction5880.90.9–1.0no difference
Tendon disorder1060.90.7–1.1no difference
Anaemia8000.90.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Gi bleeding4790.80.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy2120.80.7–1.0lower than other drugs
Stroke6490.80.8–0.9lower than other drugs

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Epinephrine only as a background or rescue medication (NCT02726620, NCT02883049); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5,9281.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.640
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 9.7 (9.4–10.1)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 3.3no trial arm names this drug
Headache4,3922.3
2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.875
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 10.6 (10.1–11.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.8no trial arm names this drug
Sinusitis4,03013.1
12.7–13.5ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
12.6 EB05 12.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 10.1 (9.7–10.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 10.8 · serious PRR 14.3no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)4,0051.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.774
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.2 (7.8–8.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.1no trial arm names this drug
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3,4482.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.957
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 11.3 (10.7–11.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.3 · serious PRR 2.2no trial arm names this drug
Nausea3,3511.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.569
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 11.2 (10.6–11.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.7no trial arm names this drug
Pain3,3351.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.824
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 9.9 (9.4–10.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.3 · serious PRR 2.0no trial arm names this drug
Product dose omission issue3,2233.7
3.6–3.8ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.413
3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.9 (7.6–8.3)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.2 · serious PRR 10.4no trial arm names this drug
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,9161.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.364
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.1
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 10.5 (10.0–11.1)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.2 · serious PRR 1.4no trial arm names this drug
Covid-192,6294.8
4.7–5.0ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.234
4.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 7.7 (7.3–8.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 5.4 · serious PRR 6.8no trial arm names this drug
Cough2,2612.6
2.5–2.7ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.742
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 10.6 (10.0–11.3)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 3.1no trial arm names this drug
Pyrexia (fever)2,2152.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 1.000
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 9.9 (9.3–10.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 1.8no trial arm names this drug
Nasopharyngitis (common cold)2,1913.9
3.7–4.0ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.386
3.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 8.7 (8.1–9.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.6 · serious PRR 5.3no trial arm names this drug
Rash2,1451.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.717
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other alpha-Adrenergic Agonists: PRR 11.4 (10.7–12.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.9no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Epinephrine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Epinephrine are headache, sinusitis, fatigue, dyspnoea, nausea, pain. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Epinephrine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Epinephrine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Epinephrine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.