← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Metoprolol Er side effects: what 62,027 FDA adverse event reports show

Metoprolol Succinate Er Tablets · 1,179 reaction terms · 234,708 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Beta-adrenergic blocker

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Metoprolol Succinate Er Tablets (Metoprolol Succinate)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

62,027 reports · 63% serious · 5,873 with death outcome · 55% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Metoprolol succinate, is a beta-adrenergic blocker indicated for the treatment of: • Hypertension, to lower blood pressure. Lowering blood pressure reduces the risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, primarily strokes and myocardial infarctions. ( 1.1 ) • Angina Pectoris.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Metoprolol succinate, is a beta 1 -selective (cardioselective) adrenoceptor blocking agent, for oral administration, available as extended-release tablets. Metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets, USP has been formulated to provide a controlled and predictable release of metoprolol for once-daily administration.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 33
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,139 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pancreatic steatosis3856.1
39.8–79.1ROR 56.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
47.1 EB05 35.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Suspected suicide37528.8
25.9–32.0ROR 28.9 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.5 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=375 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Brash syndrome10528.3
23.2–34.5ROR 28.3 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 22.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=105 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Periorbital pain4319.1
14.0–25.9ROR 19.1 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.9 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Arterial haemorrhage4915.0
11.3–20.0ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
14.2 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome4611.5
8.6–15.4ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.8 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge5411.0
8.4–14.4ROR 11.0 · calibrated p 0.026 ✓
10.3 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Aortic valve stenosis5510.7
8.2–14.0ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.028 ✓
10.0 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia14310.6
9.0–12.6ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
10.2 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=143not reported in cached trials
Eyelid pain5910.6
8.2–13.7ROR 10.6 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
10.0 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tachyarrhythmia7310.1
8.0–12.8ROR 10.1 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
9.6 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=73 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis659.2
7.2–11.8ROR 9.2 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
8.7 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Essential hypertension678.9
7.0–11.4ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.050 ✓
8.4 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=61not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary648.7
6.8–11.2ROR 8.7 · calibrated p 0.054
8.2 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64not reported in cached trials
Aortic arteriosclerosis628.3
6.4–10.7ROR 8.3 · calibrated p 0.063
7.8 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site haemorrhage778.2
6.5–10.3ROR 8.2 · calibrated p 0.065
7.8 EB05 6.4 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Chronic gastritis538.2
6.2–10.7ROR 8.2 · calibrated p 0.067
7.6 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=53 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site bruising467.4
5.6–10.0ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.089
6.9 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Diastolic dysfunction677.4
5.8–9.5ROR 7.4 · calibrated p 0.087
7.0 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=62not reported in cached trials
Diverticulum intestinal927.3
5.9–8.9ROR 7.3 · calibrated p 0.092
6.9 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=90 · ♀ 76% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion626.9
5.4–8.9ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.106
6.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61not reported in cached trials
Hepatic cyst686.9
5.4–8.8ROR 6.9 · calibrated p 0.108
6.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=68 · ♀ 100% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Product administration interrupted1516.8
5.8–7.9ROR 6.8 · calibrated p 0.110
6.5 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=125not reported in cached trials
Seasonal allergy2766.7
6.0–7.6ROR 6.7 · calibrated p 0.111
6.5 EB05 5.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=119 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Atrial flutter1486.3
5.4–7.5ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.132
6.1 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.4not reported in cached trials
Infusion site swelling1035.7
4.7–7.0ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.172
5.5 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 81% consumernot reported in cached trials
Oxygen consumption increased395.7
4.1–7.8ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.184
5.3 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease marker100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device infusion issue405.6
4.1–7.6ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.190
5.2 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact♀ 100% (drug 55%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery1075.5
4.6–6.7ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.186
5.3 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=106not reported in cached trials
Tricuspid valve incompetence1285.5
4.7–6.6ROR 5.6 · calibrated p 0.186
5.4 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0 · ♀ 76% (drug 55%)not reported in cached trials
Ventricular hypokinesia525.5
4.2–7.3ROR 5.5 · calibrated p 0.192
5.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=52 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ventricular extrasystoles1665.5
4.7–6.4ROR 5.5 · calibrated p 0.191
5.3 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.9not reported in cached trials
Infusion site erythema1305.4
4.5–6.4ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.201
5.2 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · ♀ 76% (drug 55%) · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Mitral valve incompetence1765.3
4.6–6.2ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.204
5.2 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8not reported in cached trials
Coronary artery occlusion2145.3
4.6–6.1ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.204
5.2 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8not reported in cached trials
Coronary artery stenosis785.3
4.2–6.6ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.211
5.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=77not reported in cached trials
Bundle branch block left665.3
4.1–6.7ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.212
5.0 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Atrial fibrillation1,5075.3
5.0–5.6ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.196
5.2 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.8not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Metoprolol Er as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3,9302.1
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.981
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3,7522.2
2.2–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.889
2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Nausea3,7151.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.726
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Dizziness3,1102.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.964
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2NCT02587351: 23/268 (8.6%) on Metoprolol Er; 16/264 (6.1%) control
Off label use (used outside approved label)3,0001.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.424
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.2Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.1not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,9940.8
0.7–0.8ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.159
0.8 EB05 0.7 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Headache2,8321.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.678
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5NCT02587351: 18/268 (6.7%) on Metoprolol Er; 15/264 (5.7%) control
Death2,5871.0
1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.316
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Outcome field, not a reactionserious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)2,3772.1
2.1–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.958
2.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.0not reported in cached trials
Pain2,2441.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.468
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1NCT02587351: 1/268 (0.4%) on Metoprolol Er; 1/264 (0.4%) control (serious AE)
Fall2,1602.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.929
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Cough1,9732.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.840
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1NCT00744237: 6/73 (8.2%) on Metoprolol Er
Pneumonia (lung infection)1,9312.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.975
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9NCT02587351: 14/268 (5.2%) on Metoprolol Er; 11/264 (4.2%) control (serious AE)
Vomiting1,8491.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.537
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Metoprolol Er?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Metoprolol Er are fatigue, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, nausea, dizziness, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Metoprolol Er have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Metoprolol Er has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Metoprolol Er causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.