← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Oxcarbazepine side effects: what 31,339 FDA adverse event reports show

Oxcarbazepine · 1,223 reaction terms · 122,452 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Anti-epileptic Agent

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

31,339 reports · 76% serious · 2,175 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Oxcarbazepine tablets are indicated for use as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults and as monotherapy in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in pediatric patients aged 4 years and above, and as adjunctive therapy in pediatric patients aged 2 years and above with partial-onset seizures.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Oxcarbazepine is an AED available as 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg film-coated tablets for oral administration. Oxcarbazepine is 10,11-Dihydro-10-oxo-5 H -dibenz[b, f ]azepine-5-carboxamide, and its structural formula is: Oxcarbazepine is a white to faintly orange crystalline powder.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 3Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 6Reporting / coding artifact 3Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 16
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,183 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Mitochondrial dna mutation33405.7
262.3–627.5ROR 406.1 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
217.4 EB05 162.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 12.4 (7.8–19.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Focal dyscognitive seizures311243.3
213.6–277.2ROR 245.7 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
174.6 EB05 159.0 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.8 (6.8–9.0)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=84not reported in cached trials
Csf oligoclonal band present20126.6
78.4–204.5ROR 126.7 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
96.3 EB05 65.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 8.4 (4.8–14.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Epileptic encephalopathy2582.8
54.6–125.6ROR 82.9 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
69.7 EB05 49.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.2 (3.3–8.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25not reported in cached trials
Multiple-drug resistance32776.7
68.4–85.9ROR 77.4 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
68.3 EB05 62.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.7 (1.5–1.9)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=237 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Central hypothyroidism3274.9
52.0–108.1ROR 75.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
64.7 EB05 48.0 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy5674.9
56.8–98.8ROR 75.0 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
65.7 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.5 (1.2–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · ♀ 34% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lennox-gastaut syndrome2373.9
48.0–113.8ROR 73.9 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
63.0 EB05 44.2 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 6.2 (3.8–10.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23not reported in cached trials
Multiple drug therapy5555.5
42.1–73.0ROR 55.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
50.3 EB05 40.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 118.4 (53.9–260.0)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Psychogenic seizure6246.7
36.1–60.4ROR 46.8 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
43.0 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 12.1 (8.7–16.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=58 · ♀ 83% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance increased5046.2
34.7–61.5ROR 46.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
42.5 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Seizure cluster5143.9
33.0–58.3ROR 43.9 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
40.6 EB05 32.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.0 (1.5–2.7)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=47not reported in cached trials
Myoclonic epilepsy8941.7
33.6–51.6ROR 41.8 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
38.9 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.6 (1.3–2.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=89not reported in cached trials
Infantile spasms4240.4
29.6–55.2ROR 40.5 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
37.5 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.7 (1.2–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Propofol infusion syndrome4038.9
28.3–53.5ROR 39.0 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
36.2 EB05 27.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.7 (4.0–8.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Partial seizures28838.3
34.1–43.2ROR 38.7 · calibrated p 7e-5 ✓
36.1 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.3 (2.0–2.6)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=275not reported in cached trials
Blood gases abnormal2937.2
25.6–54.0ROR 37.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.4 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 15.1 (9.0–25.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Atonic seizures4236.0
26.4–49.2ROR 36.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
33.7 EB05 26.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.4 (1.0–1.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=39not reported in cached trials
Change in seizure presentation3334.3
24.2–48.7ROR 34.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
32.1 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.5 (1.1–2.2)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=31 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Temporal lobe epilepsy2132.4
20.9–50.3ROR 32.4 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
30.2 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 12.7 (7.1–22.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20not reported in cached trials
Sedation complication10829.3
24.1–35.5ROR 29.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.9 EB05 23.8 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 31.9 (22.9–44.5)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=106 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Aura7828.4
22.6–35.6ROR 28.4 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
27.0 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.0 (1.6–2.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=53not reported in cached trials
Hypochloraemia4626.6
19.8–35.7ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.4 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=45 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Trigeminal neuralgia15826.5
22.6–31.0ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.4 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 95.2 (62.5–145.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=121not reported in cached trials
Tonic convulsion5526.5
20.2–34.6ROR 26.5 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
25.3 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.4 (1.1–1.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anticonvulsant drug level decreased5425.5
19.4–33.4ROR 25.5 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
24.4 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=52not reported in cached trials
Pleocytosis2124.4
15.8–37.7ROR 24.4 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
23.1 EB05 15.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 5.8 (3.5–9.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Hyperammonaemic encephalopathy6224.3
18.9–31.3ROR 24.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
23.3 EB05 18.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.6 (1.2–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Electroencephalogram abnormal11324.1
19.9–29.0ROR 24.1 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
23.1 EB05 19.8 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.0 (1.7–2.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=107not reported in cached trials
Anticonvulsant drug level below therapeutic2421.1
14.0–31.6ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.1 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.1 (0.7–1.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23not reported in cached trials
Epilepsy93120.4
19.1–21.7ROR 21.0 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.8 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 15.4NCT00908349: 2/214 (0.9%) on Oxcarbazepine (serious AE)
Status epilepticus33219.6
17.6–21.8ROR 19.8 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.0 EB05 17.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.0 (0.9–1.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 14.8NCT01498822: 1/174 (0.6%) on Oxcarbazepine (serious AE)
Congenital hydronephrosis2018.6
11.9–28.9ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.6 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 100.5 (29.9–338.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cryptorchism3118.4
12.9–26.3ROR 18.4 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
17.7 EB05 13.0 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 7.3 (4.8–11.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance decreased10417.2
14.1–20.9ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.7 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=104 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Oxcarbazepine as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (2 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,9811.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.653
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.3 (1.3–1.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Seizure2,92316.9
16.4–17.5ROR 18.5 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.5 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.8 (1.7–1.9)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 12.2not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,7511.3
1.3–1.4ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.527
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.4 (1.4–1.5)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)1,6411.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.570
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2not reported in cached trials
Dizziness1,5582.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.990
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.6 (1.6–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1NCT01498822: 1/173 (0.6%) on Oxcarbazepine (serious AE)
Convulsion (seizure)1,46416.8
15.9–17.7ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.4 EB05 15.7 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 2.2 (2.1–2.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.4NCT01498822: 5/174 (2.9%) on Oxcarbazepine (serious AE)
Headache1,4621.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.668
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.7 (1.6–1.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5NCT01498822: 36/174 (20.7%) on Oxcarbazepine
Somnolence (drowsiness)1,4624.7
4.5–5.0ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.243
4.7 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.6 (1.5–1.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1NCT01498822: 24/174 (13.8%) on Oxcarbazepine
Nausea1,3401.1
1.0–1.2ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.377
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.0
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.4 (1.3–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1NCT00908349: 16/214 (7.5%) on Oxcarbazepine
Hyponatraemia (low sodium)1,30515.4
14.6–16.3ROR 16.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.1 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 8.2 (7.6–8.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.2NCT01498822: 1/174 (0.6%) on Oxcarbazepine (serious AE)
Fall1,2202.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.839
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.8 (1.7–1.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,1471.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.713
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.5NCT00908349: 13/214 (6.1%) on Oxcarbazepine
Drug interaction1,0544.3
4.1–4.6ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.305
4.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Rash1,0121.5
1.4–1.6ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.663
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 0.9 (0.9–1.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8NCT01498822: 13/174 (7.5%) on Oxcarbazepine
Anxiety9912.3
2.1–2.4ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.904
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Anti-epileptic Agents: PRR 1.5 (1.4–1.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Oxcarbazepine ↔ Hyponatraemia.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Oxcarbazepine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Oxcarbazepine are seizure, fatigue, dizziness, convulsion, headache, somnolence. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Oxcarbazepine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Oxcarbazepine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Oxcarbazepine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.