← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Sacubitril and Valsartan side effects: what 115,375 FDA adverse event reports show

Sacubitril And Valsartan · 1,216 reaction terms · 320,098 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

115,375 reports · 51% serious · 14,147 with death outcome · 36% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Sacubitril and valsartan tablets are a combination of sacubitril, a neprilisin inhibitor, and valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and sacubitril and valsartan tablets are indicated: • to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure in adult patients with chronic heart failure.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Sacubitril and valsartan tablets is a combination of a neprilysin inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Sacubitril and valsartan contains a complex comprised of anionic forms of Sacubitril, Valsartan and sodium cations in the ratio of 1:1:3, respectively.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

FETAL TOXICITY • When pregnancy is detected, discontinue Sacubitril and valsartan tablets as soon as possible. (5.1) • Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus. (5.1) WARNING: FETAL TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 13Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 16
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,176 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Device inappropriate shock delivery36168.9
107.1–266.5ROR 169.0 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
83.5 EB05 63.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%)not reported in cached trials
Throat clearing1,549130.2
122.0–139.0ROR 131.9 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
75.6 EB05 72.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=464 · 96% consumernot reported in cached trials
Ejection fraction abnormal42897.2
86.4–109.4ROR 97.6 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
63.1 EB05 58.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=168 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide increased24237.8
32.9–43.4ROR 37.9 · calibrated p 8e-5 ✓
31.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=223not reported in cached trials
Left ventricular enlargement4337.0
26.7–51.4ROR 37.1 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
30.5 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=41 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ejection fraction decreased2,49434.6
33.1–36.1ROR 35.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
29.1 EB05 28.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 41.7 (38.1–45.6)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
age-adj. PRR 34.1 · serious PRR 27.7 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Ventricular enlargement2732.8
21.7–49.4ROR 32.8 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.4 EB05 19.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=27 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%)not reported in cached trials
Inferior vena cava dilatation3232.6
22.4–47.5ROR 32.6 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
27.3 EB05 20.3 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ejection fraction8631.2
24.8–39.3ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
26.6 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=20 · 88% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cardiac dysfunction52430.3
27.6–33.2ROR 30.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
26.0 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=520 · 86% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cardiac failure chronic60630.1
27.6–32.8ROR 30.2 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
25.9 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 14.9 (13.1–16.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=605NCT03066804: 21/1,280 (1.6%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Brain natriuretic peptide abnormal2725.9
17.3–38.8ROR 25.9 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
22.4 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Chronic left ventricular failure4325.1
18.2–34.5ROR 25.1 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
21.9 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=42NCT03066804: 1/1,280 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Left atrial enlargement6324.3
18.7–31.6ROR 24.3 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
21.4 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=60not reported in cached trials
Weight fluctuation1,14122.3
20.9–23.7ROR 22.5 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.9 EB05 18.9 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 69.8 (59.2–82.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=396 · 91% consumernot reported in cached trials
Low cardiac output syndrome2917.2
11.7–25.2ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.5 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Left ventricular dilatation4116.1
11.7–22.2ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
14.7 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=40not reported in cached trials
Concomitant disease aggravated50416.1
14.7–17.6ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
14.8 EB05 13.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 22.7 (19.3–26.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=356not reported in cached trials
Blood pressure systolic decreased36816.0
14.4–17.8ROR 16.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
14.8 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 17.5 (14.8–20.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=247not reported in cached trials
Brain natriuretic peptide increased25016.0
14.0–18.2ROR 16.0 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
14.7 EB05 13.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 20.1 (16.2–25.0)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=201not reported in cached trials
Prescribed underdose1,58615.6
14.8–16.4ROR 15.8 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
14.4 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 52.7 (46.5–59.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 16.5 · serious PRR 11.3not reported in cached trials
Cardiorenal syndrome4314.7
10.8–20.1ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
13.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=43 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dizziness postural68413.9
12.8–15.0ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.009 ✓
12.9 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 29.4 (25.3–34.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=283 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fluid imbalance4813.2
9.8–17.7ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.1 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea paroxysmal nocturnal5013.2
9.9–17.5ROR 13.2 · calibrated p 0.014 ✓
12.1 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Orthopnoea21212.9
11.2–14.8ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.0 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 11.0 (9.0–13.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=195not reported in cached trials
Dilated cardiomyopathy5711.8
9.0–15.5ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
10.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=57not reported in cached trials
Systolic dysfunction6411.7
9.1–15.1ROR 11.7 · calibrated p 0.020 ✓
10.8 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 28.1 (17.3–45.6)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=63not reported in cached trials
Glycosylated haemoglobin decreased9511.5
9.3–14.1ROR 11.5 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓
10.7 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cardiac output decreased5211.4
8.6–15.1ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.023 ✓
10.4 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=47not reported in cached trials
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy18111.2
9.7–13.0ROR 11.2 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓
10.5 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 14.5 (11.5–18.2)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=181not reported in cached trials
Hypotension (low blood pressure)11,57711.1
10.9–11.3ROR 12.2 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓
10.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 17.1 (16.7–17.6)
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
age-adj. PRR 9.1 · serious PRR 6.5NCT03066804: 6/1,280 (0.5%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome3011.1
7.6–16.0ROR 11.1 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
9.8 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 36%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction2610.9
7.3–16.2ROR 10.9 · calibrated p 0.029 ✓
9.6 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=26not reported in cached trials
Jugular vein distension3210.7
7.5–15.3ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
9.5 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Heart valve incompetence15810.5
9.0–12.3ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.028 ✓
9.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 31.2 (22.6–42.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=105 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hypoacusis2,35710.5
10.1–10.9ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.0 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 41.6 (37.9–45.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.2 · serious PRR 5.1 · 89% consumernot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Heart failure8,4839.08.8–9.2signal
Arrhythmia / qt3,4033.23.1–3.3signal
Myocardial infarction2,9902.72.6–2.8signal
Kidney injury5,6002.22.2–2.3signal
Stroke2,2251.61.6–1.7raised
Hyponatraemia6831.51.4–1.7raised
Fall / fracture2,9591.41.4–1.5raised
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes2,3451.21.2–1.3raised
Anaphylaxis / angioedema7581.11.0–1.2raised
Hypoglycaemia5561.11.0–1.1no difference
Depression1,2630.80.8–0.9lower than other drugs
Serious infection3,0520.70.7–0.7lower than other drugs
Anaemia1,0010.60.6–0.6lower than other drugs
Venous thromboembolism7080.60.6–0.6lower than other drugs
Malignancy1,0460.50.5–0.5lower than other drugs
Gi bleeding5040.50.5–0.5lower than other drugs

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Sacubitril and Valsartan as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (5 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hypotension (low blood pressure)11,57711.1
10.9–11.3ROR 12.2 · calibrated p 0.016 ✓
10.5 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 17.1 (16.7–17.6)
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
age-adj. PRR 9.1 · serious PRR 6.5NCT03066804: 6/1,280 (0.5%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Death9,1461.9
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.955
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 17.3 (16.8–17.9)
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.2 · 70% consumerNCT03066804: 2/1,280 (0.2%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)8,9992.9
2.9–3.0ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.599
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.6 (7.4–7.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.1 · serious PRR 2.7 · 73% consumerNCT03066804: 1/1,280 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Dizziness8,7183.2
3.2–3.3ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.509
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.6 (7.4–7.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 3.2 · serious PRR 2.6 · 75% consumerNCT03066804: 1/1,280 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)8,7132.1
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.984
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 6.6 (6.5–6.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 1.9 · 80% consumerNCT03066804: 1/1,284 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Cough7,8675.2
5.1–5.3ROR 5.5 · calibrated p 0.183
5.1 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 10.7 (10.4–11.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 4.7 · serious PRR 3.4 · 84% consumerNCT03066804: 1/1,284 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Wrong technique in product usage process7,3226.8
6.6–7.0ROR 7.2 · calibrated p 0.091
6.6 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 47.3 (44.8–50.0)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 7.0 · serious PRR 15.3 · 71% consumernot reported in cached trials
Weight decreased (weight loss)5,2093.4
3.3–3.5ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.472
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 8.3 (8.0–8.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.3 · serious PRR 2.2 · 85% consumernot reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)4,4631.9
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.881
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 5.4 (5.2–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.6 · serious PRR 1.5 · 78% consumerNCT03066804: 1/1,284 (0.1%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)
Asthenia (weakness)3,8181.9
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · calibrated p 0.878
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 4.4 (4.3–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.6 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Weight increased (weight gain)3,5102.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.642
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 9.3 (8.9–9.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.8 · serious PRR 2.4 · 78% consumernot reported in cached trials
Blood pressure decreased3,1819.1
8.8–9.4ROR 9.3 · calibrated p 0.041 ✓
8.7 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 13.9 (13.2–14.7)
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
age-adj. PRR 7.5 · serious PRR 6.8not reported in cached trials
Product dose omission issue2,8501.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.858
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 14.3 (13.5–15.1)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.8 · 88% consumernot reported in cached trials
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)2,7822.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.642
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Angiotensin 2 Receptor Blockers: PRR 7.7 (7.4–8.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 3.2 · 78% consumerNCT03066804: 2/1,280 (0.2%) on Sacubitril and Valsartan (serious AE)

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Valsartan ↔ Acute kidney injury.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Sacubitril and Valsartan?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Sacubitril and Valsartan are hypotension, dyspnoea, dizziness, fatigue, cough, weight decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Sacubitril and Valsartan have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: FETAL TOXICITY • When pregnancy is detected, discontinue Sacubitril and valsartan tablets as soon as possible. (5.1) • Drugs that act directly on the renin-angiotensin system can cause injury and death to the developing fetus. (5.1) WARNING: FETAL TOXICITY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning .

Do FAERS signals prove that Sacubitril and Valsartan causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.