← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Hydrocortisone Acetate side effects: what 72,236 FDA adverse event reports show

Hydrocortisone Acetate · 1,243 reaction terms · 580,514 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Corticosteroid

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

72,236 reports · 83% serious · 10,727 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Hydrocortisone tablets are indicated in the following conditions. 1. Endocrine Disorders Primary or secondary adrenocortical insufficiency (hydrocortisone or cortisone is the first choice; synthetic analogs may be used in conjunction with mineralocorti.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Cortisol is a 17alpha-hydroxy-C21-steroid that is pregn-4-ene substituted by oxo groups at positions 3 and 20 and hydroxy groups at positions 11, 17 and 21.

PubChem CID 5754 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 3Likely indication confounding 6Reporting / coding artifact 3Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,203 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Human bocavirus infection113429.9
321.1–575.6ROR 430.6 · calibrated p 8e-13 ✓
167.3 EB05 143.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.1 (6.6–9.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=113not reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody342307.9
264.3–358.6ROR 309.3 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
147.4 EB05 134.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.5–6.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=342 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative966284.2
260.0–310.6ROR 288.0 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
142.5 EB05 135.1 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.9 (5.5–6.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=966 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris585282.9
252.4–317.1ROR 285.2 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
141.9 EB05 132.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.6–6.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=585 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever2,024252.4
237.9–267.9ROR 259.7 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
134.2 EB05 129.4 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.8–6.3)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=2,024 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased1,443251.7
234.6–270.1ROR 256.8 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
134.0 EB05 128.3 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.8–6.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,443 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength106245.9
189.7–318.8ROR 246.3 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
129.5 EB05 110.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.2 (6.7–10.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=106 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lymphoid tissue hypoplasia68245.6
177.6–339.7ROR 245.9 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
127.8 EB05 104.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.6 (5.9–9.7)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=68not reported in cached trials
Vaginal flatulence138240.1
191.5–301.1ROR 240.6 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
128.6 EB05 111.5 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.6 (4.7–6.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=138 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein405235.4
206.4–268.4ROR 236.7 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
128.7 EB05 118.5 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.3 (4.8–5.9)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=405 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Thymus hypoplasia73214.8
158.5–290.9ROR 215.0 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓
119.2 EB05 98.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.6 (6.0–9.7)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=73not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder therapy77205.3
153.2–275.2ROR 205.6 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
116.4 EB05 96.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: only this drug
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=77 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive2,775186.8
178.1–195.8ROR 194.2 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓
113.2 EB05 109.7 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.3 (6.1–6.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 78.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count95183.2
141.6–237.0ROR 183.4 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
109.5 EB05 92.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.9 (6.4–9.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=95 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood771180.5
165.0–197.5ROR 182.4 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
110.6 EB05 104.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.7–6.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=771 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,205180.3
167.8–193.7ROR 183.4 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
110.7 EB05 105.5 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.4 (5.1–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,205 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive2,193178.7
169.5–188.4ROR 184.3 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
110.2 EB05 106.3 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.8 (6.5–7.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2,193 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra740145.0
132.8–158.4ROR 146.5 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
96.3 EB05 90.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.8 (5.4–6.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=740 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal582140.7
127.5–155.4ROR 141.9 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
94.3 EB05 88.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.7 (5.2–6.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=582 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired163124.0
103.2–149.1ROR 124.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
85.9 EB05 75.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.5 (5.6–7.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=163 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cystitis bacterial96114.1
90.1–144.6ROR 114.3 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
80.5 EB05 67.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.5 (6.9–10.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=96not reported in cached trials
Norovirus test positive88108.2
84.7–138.3ROR 108.4 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
77.5 EB05 64.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.5 (6.8–10.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=88not reported in cached trials
Analgesic therapy83107.7
83.6–138.6ROR 107.8 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
77.1 EB05 64.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 13.8 (10.9–17.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=83 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection2,691104.2
99.7–108.8ROR 108.2 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
76.5 EB05 74.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.8–6.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 56.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Steroid dependence223103.3
88.6–120.4ROR 103.6 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
75.6 EB05 67.7 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.3 (5.5–7.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=221 · ♀ 28% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Pemphigus3,234102.1
98.2–106.2ROR 106.9 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
75.4 EB05 73.3 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.7 (5.5–5.9)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 52.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis434102.0
91.4–113.8ROR 102.6 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
75.2 EB05 69.4 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.1 (4.7–5.7)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=434 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicolith9799.6
79.0–125.4ROR 99.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
73.0 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 10.8 (8.7–13.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity3,14391.8
88.2–95.5ROR 95.9 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
69.7 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.9 (5.7–6.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 52.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease92587.5
81.3–94.1ROR 88.6 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
67.1 EB05 63.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.3 (4.9–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=922 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Craniopharyngioma7684.4
65.3–109.0ROR 84.5 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
64.3 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.6 (6.7–10.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=75 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adrenocortical insufficiency acute42482.4
73.9–91.7ROR 82.8 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
64.0 EB05 59.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.5 (7.7–9.4)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=419not reported in cached trials
Drug therapy7081.2
62.3–105.9ROR 81.3 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
62.4 EB05 51.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 1,801.1 (567.1–5,719.7)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=70 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury1,75679.0
74.9–83.2ROR 80.9 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
62.0 EB05 59.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.2–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 46.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia6577.6
59.0–102.1ROR 77.7 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
60.2 EB05 48.9 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.7 (5.2–8.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=65 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type1,35177.0
72.6–81.8ROR 78.5 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
60.8 EB05 58.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.8 (5.5–6.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,347 · ♀ 100% (drug 59%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mycobacterium chelonae infection15275.4
63.1–90.2ROR 75.6 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
59.4 EB05 51.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.0 (4.3–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=152not reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Liver injury5,3445.25.1–5.4signal
Interstitial lung disease1,4704.54.3–4.7signal
Hyponatraemia1,0613.93.6–4.1signal
Serious infection8,3313.23.1–3.2signal
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis2,6333.13.0–3.2signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes3,6763.13.0–3.2signal
Pancreatitis7812.82.6–3.0signal
Severe cutaneous reaction6332.52.3–2.7signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema1,0582.52.3–2.6signal
Gi bleeding1,5232.42.3–2.6signal
Opportunistic infection1,1342.42.3–2.6signal
Depression2,3162.42.3–2.5signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy6032.22.0–2.3signal
Anaemia2,1702.12.0–2.2signal
Venous thromboembolism1,4672.01.9–2.1raised
Thrombocytopenia1,4621.91.8–2.0raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Hydrocortisone Acetate as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)10,7013.6
3.5–3.7ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.366
3.6 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.1 (3.1–3.2)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 4.3not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)9,1342.0
2.0–2.1ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.968
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.0)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)7,4422.8
2.7–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.625
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.5 · serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated6,6106.5
6.3–6.6ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.098
6.3 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.2 (4.1–4.3)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.8 · serious PRR 6.4not reported in cached trials
Rash6,2814.3
4.2–4.4ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.288
4.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.3 (4.2–4.4)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.6 · serious PRR 5.6 · ♀ 79% (drug 59%)not reported in cached trials
Pain5,9562.8
2.8–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.629
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 2.9 · ♀ 83% (drug 59%)NCT00691002: 1/362 (0.3%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate (serious AE)
Nausea5,6832.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.955
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.4 (3.3–3.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.5 · ♀ 79% (drug 59%)NCT00691002: 1/453 (0.2%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate (serious AE)
Arthralgia (joint pain)5,2933.7
3.6–3.8ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.385
3.7 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.0 · serious PRR 4.3 · ♀ 82% (drug 59%)NCT00691002: 12/453 (2.6%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5,2692.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.814
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.6NCT00691002: 4/351 (1.1%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate
Headache5,1712.4
2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.806
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 3.1 · ♀ 81% (drug 59%)NCT00691002: 8/362 (2.2%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5,1012.6
2.6–2.7ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.711
2.6 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.0)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)4,6453.9
3.8–4.0ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.353
3.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.0 · serious PRR 3.3NCT00691002: 3/362 (0.8%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate
Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion)4,63521.8
21.2–22.5ROR 23.3 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
20.4 EB05 19.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.9 (4.8–5.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 16.6 · serious PRR 17.5 · ♀ 88% (drug 59%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vomiting4,6042.9
2.8–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.628
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.7 (3.6–3.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.3 · serious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Pruritus (itching)4,3883.4
3.3–3.5ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.472
3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.4 (4.3–4.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 4.6 · ♀ 79% (drug 59%)NCT00691002: 2/351 (0.6%) on Hydrocortisone Acetate

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Medroxyprogesterone acetate ↔ Meningioma.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Hydrocortisone Acetate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Hydrocortisone Acetate are fatigue, rash, pain, nausea, arthralgia, diarrhoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Hydrocortisone Acetate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Hydrocortisone Acetate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Hydrocortisone Acetate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.