← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Infliximab-Dyyb side effects: what 29,058 FDA adverse event reports show

Infliximab-Dyyb · Inflectra · 1,169 reaction terms · 224,921 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Tumor Necrosis Factor Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Inflectra

openFDA label

Who reports

29,058 reports · 83% serious · 703 with death outcome · 59% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

INFLECTRA is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker indicated for: Crohn's Disease ( 1.1 ): • reducing signs and symptoms and inducing and maintaining clinical remission in adult patients with moderately to severely active disease who have had an inadequate response to conventional therapy.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Infliximab-dyyb, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker, is a chimeric IgG1κ monoclonal antibody (composed of human constant and murine variable regions). It has a molecular weight of approximately 149.1 kilodaltons. Infliximab-dyyb is produced by a recombinant murine myeloma cell line, SP2/0.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY WARNING: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning • Increased risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, inc.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 8Likely indication confounding 4Reporting / coding artifact 4Lab value / disease marker 6Not in label — unassessed 18
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,129 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Harvey-bradshaw index increased1636,439.3
3,958.0–10,476.2ROR 6,475.7 · calibrated p 1e-25 ✓
596.1 EB05 523.2 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=163no trial arm names this drug
Drug level below therapeutic1,189199.6
187.4–212.6ROR 208.1 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
155.7 EB05 148.4 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 70.2 (65.5–75.2)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=1,171no trial arm names this drug
Faecal calprotectin increased619179.1
164.1–195.4ROR 183.0 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
142.6 EB05 133.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 47.7 (43.5–52.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=611no trial arm names this drug
Anal fissure1,046176.2
164.8–188.3ROR 182.7 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓
141.0 EB05 134.0 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 83.0 (76.7–89.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,041no trial arm names this drug
Drug level above therapeutic698131.0
120.9–141.9ROR 134.2 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
110.4 EB05 103.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 97.0 (87.5–107.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=691no trial arm names this drug
Drug level decreased1,249100.4
94.7–106.4ROR 104.9 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
88.0 EB05 84.0 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 60.9 (57.1–65.0)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 74.6no trial arm names this drug
White coat hypertension66100.3
77.5–129.7ROR 100.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
85.9 EB05 69.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66no trial arm names this drug
Anal fissure haemorrhage1983.4
51.9–134.1ROR 83.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
69.7 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Drug specific antibody present66582.4
76.1–89.2ROR 84.3 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
73.8 EB05 69.2 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 23.8 (21.9–25.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=635no trial arm names this drug
Aphthous ulcer75378.5
72.9–84.6ROR 80.6 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
70.7 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 68.7 (62.8–75.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=752no trial arm names this drug
Intentional product use issue8,39676.2
74.7–77.6ROR 106.7 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
68.9 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 30.1 (30.1–30.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 68.7no trial arm names this drug
Erythema nodosum33275.6
67.5–84.6ROR 76.4 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
68.1 EB05 62.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 43.5 (38.3–49.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=329no trial arm names this drug
Pilonidal disease2169.8
44.6–109.2ROR 69.8 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
60.3 EB05 41.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21no trial arm names this drug
Fistula discharge11169.1
56.9–84.0ROR 69.4 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
62.4 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 52.1 (41.4–65.7)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=109no trial arm names this drug
Ileocaecal resection2969.0
47.1–101.0ROR 69.0 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
60.6 EB05 44.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 11.1 (7.5–16.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Body temperature fluctuation17967.8
58.2–79.0ROR 68.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
61.6 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 64.8 (53.6–78.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=172no trial arm names this drug
Exposure to sars-cov-214667.0
56.5–79.3ROR 67.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.8 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 43.3 (35.6–52.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=142no trial arm names this drug
Steroid dependence6963.7
49.8–81.5ROR 63.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
57.7 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 14.1 (10.9–18.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=69 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Blood pressure diastolic increased37663.7
57.3–70.7ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
58.4 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 81.4 (71.1–93.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=375no trial arm names this drug
Blood pressure fluctuation1,94963.6
60.8–66.5ROR 68.1 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
58.4 EB05 56.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 52.5 (50.1–55.0)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 50.7no trial arm names this drug
Fistula91163.5
59.4–67.8ROR 65.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
58.3 EB05 55.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 32.1 (29.9–34.4)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 42.7no trial arm names this drug
Stoma closure2462.3
41.0–94.5ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
55.0 EB05 38.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=24no trial arm names this drug
Vaginal flatulence2461.4
40.5–93.1ROR 61.4 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
54.3 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 9.4 (6.2–14.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial arm names this drug
Poor venous access80561.0
56.8–65.5ROR 62.7 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
56.2 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 59.7 (54.9–64.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=794no trial arm names this drug
Drain placement1960.9
38.1–97.2ROR 60.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
53.3 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial arm names this drug
Blood pressure diastolic decreased55758.6
53.8–63.8ROR 59.7 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
54.1 EB05 50.4 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 87.0 (77.8–97.3)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 39.6 · ♀ 36% (drug 59%)no trial arm names this drug
Pseudopolyp2758.5
39.5–86.7ROR 58.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
52.3 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27no trial arm names this drug
Vein rupture11553.3
44.1–64.4ROR 53.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
49.3 EB05 42.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 68.8 (54.1–87.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=113no trial arm names this drug
Faecal calprotectin abnormal2853.2
36.3–78.1ROR 53.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
48.1 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 36.1 (23.3–55.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Vaginal fistula2451.1
33.8–77.3ROR 51.1 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
46.1 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=24no trial arm names this drug
Vein collapse5050.7
38.1–67.6ROR 50.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
46.6 EB05 36.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=49no trial arm names this drug
Catarrh5547.5
36.2–62.4ROR 47.6 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
44.0 EB05 35.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 16.3 (12.3–21.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=55 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

No completed trial with posted adverse-event results was found on ClinicalTrials.gov for Infliximab-Dyyb (searched INFLIXIMAB-DYYB).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)15,20012.8
12.7–13.0ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
12.6 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 15.0 (15.0–15.0)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 15.1no trial arm names this drug
Condition aggravated10,70626.5
26.1–26.9ROR 41.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
25.6 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 16.8 (16.8–16.8)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 26.6no trial arm names this drug
Intentional product use issue8,39676.2
74.7–77.6ROR 106.7 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
68.9 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 30.1 (30.1–30.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 68.7no trial arm names this drug
Inappropriate schedule of product administration6,59627.9
27.3–28.6ROR 35.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
26.9 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 45.1 (45.1–45.1)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 46.2no trial arm names this drug
Arthralgia (joint pain)4,9328.7
8.5–8.9ROR 10.3 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓
8.6 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 5.0 (5.0–5.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 10.8no trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3,5942.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.997
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 1.9 (1.9–1.9)
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)3,4103.2
3.1–3.3ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.493
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.0 (3.9–4.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 4.1no trial arm names this drug
Malaise (feeling unwell)2,9184.8
4.7–5.0ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.210
4.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 6.3 (6.1–6.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.5 · ♀ 81% (drug 59%)no trial arm names this drug
Headache2,4232.8
2.7–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.638
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.1 (4.0–4.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.9no trial arm names this drug
Nausea2,3802.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.910
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.5 (4.4–4.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.8no trial arm names this drug
Covid-192,3639.8
9.4–10.1ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓
9.6 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 18.8 (18.2–19.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.8no trial arm names this drug
Pain2,3132.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.671
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 2.2 (2.1–2.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.9no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Infliximab (TNF inhibitors) ↔ Tuberculosis reactivation.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Infliximab-Dyyb?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Infliximab-Dyyb are arthralgia, fatigue, weight increased, weight decreased, malaise, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Infliximab-Dyyb have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY WARNING: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning • Increased risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, inc.

Do FAERS signals prove that Infliximab-Dyyb causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.