Infliximab-Dyyb side effects: what 29,058 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Brand names
Inflectra
Who reports
29,058 reports · 83% serious · 703 with death outcome · 59% female
Used for
INFLECTRA is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker indicated for: Crohn's Disease ( 1.1 ): • reducing signs and symptoms and inducing and maintaining clinical remission in adult patients with moderately to severely active disease who have had an inadequate response to conventional therapy.
What it is
Infliximab-dyyb, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker, is a chimeric IgG1κ monoclonal antibody (composed of human constant and murine variable regions). It has a molecular weight of approximately 149.1 kilodaltons. Infliximab-dyyb is produced by a recombinant murine myeloma cell line, SP2/0.
Boxed warning
SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY WARNING: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning • Increased risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, inc.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Likely indication confounding The term appears in the label's indications: reports probably describe the disease being treated (or its progression), not a drug effect. Classic confounding by indication.
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,129 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey-bradshaw index increased | 163 | 6,439.3 3,958.0–10,476.2ROR 6,475.7 · calibrated p 1e-25 ✓ | 596.1 EB05 523.2 · IC025 +7.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=163 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ear infection bacterial | 59 | 200.7 150.4–267.9ROR 201.1 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓ | 149.3 EB05 120.0 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=59 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug level below therapeutic | 1,189 | 199.6 187.4–212.6ROR 208.1 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 155.7 EB05 148.4 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 70.2 (65.5–75.2) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=1,171 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Faecal calprotectin increased | 619 | 179.1 164.1–195.4ROR 183.0 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓ | 142.6 EB05 133.4 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 47.7 (43.5–52.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=611 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anal fissure | 1,046 | 176.2 164.8–188.3ROR 182.7 · calibrated p 9e-10 ✓ | 141.0 EB05 134.0 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 83.0 (76.7–89.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1,041 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sinusitis bacterial | 199 | 167.1 143.2–194.9ROR 168.2 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓ | 133.8 EB05 118.9 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 105.3 (86.1–128.8) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=199 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anal fistula infection | 24 | 138.7 89.6–214.8ROR 138.9 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 106.6 EB05 75.4 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug level above therapeutic | 698 | 131.0 120.9–141.9ROR 134.2 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 110.4 EB05 103.7 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 97.0 (87.5–107.4) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=691 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Bronchitis bacterial | 96 | 103.3 83.4–127.9ROR 103.6 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 88.8 EB05 74.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=96 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug level decreased | 1,249 | 100.4 94.7–106.4ROR 104.9 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓ | 88.0 EB05 84.0 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 60.9 (57.1–65.0) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 74.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| White coat hypertension | 66 | 100.3 77.5–129.7ROR 100.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 85.9 EB05 69.9 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=66 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Treatment delayed | 179 | 89.8 76.9–104.9ROR 90.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 79.2 EB05 69.9 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 116.2 (93.4–144.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=55 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anal fissure haemorrhage | 19 | 83.4 51.9–134.1ROR 83.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 69.7 EB05 47.2 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug specific antibody present | 665 | 82.4 76.1–89.2ROR 84.3 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 73.8 EB05 69.2 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 23.8 (21.9–25.7) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=635 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Aphthous ulcer | 753 | 78.5 72.9–84.6ROR 80.6 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 70.7 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 68.7 (62.8–75.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=752 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intentional product use issue | 8,396 | 76.2 74.7–77.6ROR 106.7 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 68.9 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 30.1 (30.1–30.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 68.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Erythema nodosum | 332 | 75.6 67.5–84.6ROR 76.4 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓ | 68.1 EB05 62.2 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 43.5 (38.3–49.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=329 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pharyngitis bacterial | 24 | 73.2 48.1–111.5ROR 73.3 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 63.3 EB05 44.8 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pilonidal disease | 21 | 69.8 44.6–109.2ROR 69.8 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 60.3 EB05 41.6 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fistula discharge | 111 | 69.1 56.9–84.0ROR 69.4 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 62.4 EB05 53.3 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 52.1 (41.4–65.7) | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=109 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ileocaecal resection | 29 | 69.0 47.1–101.0ROR 69.0 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 60.6 EB05 44.2 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 11.1 (7.5–16.2) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=29 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Body temperature fluctuation | 179 | 67.8 58.2–79.0ROR 68.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 61.6 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 64.8 (53.6–78.3) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=172 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Exposure to sars-cov-2 | 146 | 67.0 56.5–79.3ROR 67.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 60.8 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 43.3 (35.6–52.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=142 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Steroid dependence | 69 | 63.7 49.8–81.5ROR 63.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 57.7 EB05 47.1 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 14.1 (10.9–18.1) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=69 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure diastolic increased | 376 | 63.7 57.3–70.7ROR 64.5 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 58.4 EB05 53.6 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 81.4 (71.1–93.2) | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=375 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure fluctuation | 1,949 | 63.6 60.8–66.5ROR 68.1 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 58.4 EB05 56.3 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 52.5 (50.1–55.0) | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 50.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fistula | 911 | 63.5 59.4–67.8ROR 65.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 58.3 EB05 55.2 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 32.1 (29.9–34.4) | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | serious PRR 42.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Suspected off label use | 139 | 62.8 52.8–74.7ROR 63.1 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 57.4 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 195.8 (146.1–262.4) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=138 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Stoma closure | 24 | 62.3 41.0–94.5ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓ | 55.0 EB05 38.9 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Likely indication confounding shares a disease stem with the indications wording | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vaginal flatulence | 24 | 61.4 40.5–93.1ROR 61.4 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓ | 54.3 EB05 38.4 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 9.4 (6.2–14.3) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Poor venous access | 805 | 61.0 56.8–65.5ROR 62.7 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 56.2 EB05 53.0 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 59.7 (54.9–64.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=794 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drain placement | 19 | 60.9 38.1–97.2ROR 60.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 53.3 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=19 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure diastolic decreased | 557 | 58.6 53.8–63.8ROR 59.7 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 54.1 EB05 50.4 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 87.0 (77.8–97.3) | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 39.6 · ♀ 36% (drug 59%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pseudopolyp | 27 | 58.5 39.5–86.7ROR 58.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 52.3 EB05 37.7 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=27 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anal fistula | 388 | 56.6 51.0–62.7ROR 57.3 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 52.3 EB05 48.1 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 27.1 (24.3–30.2) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=386 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vein rupture | 115 | 53.3 44.1–64.4ROR 53.5 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 49.3 EB05 42.1 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 68.8 (54.1–87.5) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=113 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Faecal calprotectin abnormal | 28 | 53.2 36.3–78.1ROR 53.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 48.1 EB05 34.9 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 36.1 (23.3–55.9) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=28 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vaginal fistula | 24 | 51.1 33.8–77.3ROR 51.1 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 46.1 EB05 32.6 · IC025 +3.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Likely indication confounding term in indications | serious n=24 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Vein collapse | 50 | 50.7 38.1–67.6ROR 50.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 46.6 EB05 36.8 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=49 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Catarrh | 55 | 47.5 36.2–62.4ROR 47.6 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 44.0 EB05 35.1 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 16.3 (12.3–21.7) | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=55 · ♀ 0% (drug 59%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 15,200 | 12.8 12.7–13.0ROR 25.8 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 12.6 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 15.0 (15.0–15.0) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 15.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Condition aggravated | 10,706 | 26.5 26.1–26.9ROR 41.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓ | 25.6 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 16.8 (16.8–16.8) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 26.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Intentional product use issue | 8,396 | 76.2 74.7–77.6ROR 106.7 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 68.9 EB05 67.6 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 30.1 (30.1–30.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 68.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Inappropriate schedule of product administration | 6,596 | 27.9 27.3–28.6ROR 35.9 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 26.9 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 45.1 (45.1–45.1) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 46.2 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 4,932 | 8.7 8.5–8.9ROR 10.3 · calibrated p 0.030 ✓ | 8.6 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 5.0 (5.0–5.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 10.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 3,594 | 2.0 1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.997 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 1.9 (1.9–1.9) | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 3,410 | 3.2 3.1–3.3ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.493 | 3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.0 (3.9–4.0) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 4.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Weight increased (weight gain) | 3,054 | 10.0 9.7–10.4ROR 11.1 · calibrated p 0.022 ✓ | 9.9 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 9.4 (9.2–9.6) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 12.5 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Weight decreased (weight loss) | 2,935 | 7.7 7.4–7.9ROR 8.4 · calibrated p 0.057 | 7.6 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 13.8 (13.5–14.2) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 7.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Malaise (feeling unwell) | 2,918 | 4.8 4.7–5.0ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.210 | 4.8 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 6.3 (6.1–6.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 5.5 · ♀ 81% (drug 59%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 2,423 | 2.8 2.7–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.638 | 2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.1 (4.0–4.2) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure increased | 2,384 | 11.4 11.0–11.8ROR 12.3 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓ | 11.2 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 25.8 (24.9–26.7) | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 11.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 2,380 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.910 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 4.5 (4.4–4.6) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Covid-19 | 2,363 | 9.8 9.4–10.1ROR 10.5 · calibrated p 0.027 ✓ | 9.6 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 18.8 (18.2–19.4) | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 11.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 2,313 | 2.7 2.6–2.8ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.671 | 2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 2.2 (2.1–2.2) | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Faecal calprotectin increased — n=619, PRR 179.1
- Anal fissure — n=1,046, PRR 176.2
- White coat hypertension — n=66, PRR 100.3
- Aphthous ulcer — n=753, PRR 78.5
- Erythema nodosum — n=332, PRR 75.6
- Pilonidal disease — n=21, PRR 69.8
- Ileocaecal resection — n=29, PRR 69.0
- Exposure to sars-cov-2 — n=146, PRR 67.0
- Steroid dependence — n=69, PRR 63.7
- Vaginal flatulence — n=24, PRR 61.4
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Infliximab (TNF inhibitors) ↔ Tuberculosis reactivation.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Infliximab-Dyyb?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Infliximab-Dyyb are arthralgia, fatigue, weight increased, weight decreased, malaise, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Infliximab-Dyyb have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY WARNING: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning • Increased risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, inc.
Do FAERS signals prove that Infliximab-Dyyb causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 37eaca10-d812-48bc-8b8e-b836bfa9968f, effective 20260728; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"INFLIXIMAB-DYYB") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,169 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
INFLIXIMAB-DYYB, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.