← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Loperamide Hydrochloride Oral side effects: what 10,143 FDA adverse event reports show

Loperamide Hydrochloride Oral · 1,054 reaction terms · 42,486 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Loperamide Hydrochloride Oral (Loperamide Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

10,143 reports · 62% serious · 966 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

controls symptoms of diarrhea, including Travelers' Diarrhea

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 3Lab value / disease marker 6No label text to screen 31
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,014 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence1051,085.9
857.6–1,374.9ROR 1,097.2 · χ² 73,532 / p <1e-300
627.1 EB05 532.8 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=105 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Presbyacusis56454.5
340.4–606.9ROR 457.0 · χ² 20,350 / p <1e-300
329.9 EB05 263.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=56 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Heart sounds15377.3
217.5–654.3ROR 377.8 · χ² 4,437 / p <1e-300
226.8 EB05 145.9 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15no trial data cached
Total lung capacity increased30254.7
174.3–372.0ROR 255.4 · χ² 6,514 / p <1e-300
198.1 EB05 145.4 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Stomatitis haemorrhagic11201.9
108.7–375.0ROR 202.1 · χ² 1,822 / p <1e-300
139.8 EB05 83.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11no trial data cached
Pleural thickening44142.5
105.0–193.3ROR 143.1 · χ² 5,647 / p <1e-300
126.1 EB05 97.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=44 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Female genital tract fistula111142.4
117.6–172.5ROR 144.0 · χ² 14,437 / p <1e-300
130.2 EB05 111.1 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=111 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Prolonged expiration15124.2
73.8–209.1ROR 124.4 · χ² 1,614 / p <1e-300
102.3 EB05 65.8 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=15no trial data cached
Pleural fibrosis58123.2
94.6–160.5ROR 123.9 · χ² 6,515 / p <1e-300
112.0 EB05 89.9 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=58 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Blood magnesium increased48115.9
86.7–154.9ROR 116.4 · χ² 5,064 / p <1e-300
105.2 EB05 82.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=47 · ♀ 91% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Anticholinergic syndrome7399.1
78.5–125.3ROR 99.9 · χ² 6,671 / p <1e-300
92.4 EB05 75.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=73 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Radiculopathy10585.6
70.5–104.0ROR 86.5 · χ² 8,349 / p <1e-300
81.0 EB05 68.9 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=105 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Proctitis11185.1
70.5–102.8ROR 86.0 · χ² 8,777 / p <1e-300
80.6 EB05 68.8 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=111 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Chronic sinusitis14884.9
72.1–100.0ROR 86.2 · χ² 11,706 / p <1e-300
80.8 EB05 70.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=148 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Gastrointestinal stoma output increased1673.9
44.9–121.7ROR 74.0 · χ² 1,041 / p 9e-229
66.0 EB05 43.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=16no trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qt interval abnormal1251.1
28.9–90.7ROR 51.2 · χ² 528 / p 5e-117
46.5 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=11no trial data cached
Macular degeneration27047.9
42.5–53.9ROR 49.2 · χ² 12,067 / p <1e-300
46.6 EB05 42.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 46.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Bone cyst2147.2
30.6–72.7ROR 47.3 · χ² 883 / p 2e-194
44.4 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=21no trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration44446.2
42.1–50.6ROR 48.3 · χ² 19,170 / p <1e-300
45.1 EB05 41.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome1144.6
24.5–80.9ROR 44.6 · χ² 417 / p 6e-93
40.8 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11no trial data cached
Tumour pain2743.0
29.4–62.9ROR 43.1 · χ² 1,044 / p 2e-229
41.0 EB05 29.6 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=27 · ♀ 86% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Metastases to abdominal cavity1042.6
22.8–79.7ROR 42.7 · χ² 358 / p 3e-80
38.9 EB05 22.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10no trial data cached
Hemianopia2042.2
27.1–65.6ROR 42.3 · χ² 748 / p 6e-165
39.9 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=20no trial data cached
Deafness neurosensory5837.2
28.7–48.2ROR 37.4 · χ² 1,971 / p <1e-300
36.1 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=58 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Epigastric discomfort6132.6
25.3–42.0ROR 32.8 · χ² 1,809 / p <1e-300
31.8 EB05 25.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=58 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Acquired haemophilia1429.7
17.5–50.3ROR 29.7 · χ² 355 / p 2e-79
28.2 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=14no trial data cached
Torsade de pointes10929.0
24.1–35.0ROR 29.3 · χ² 2,882 / p <1e-300
28.5 EB05 24.3 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 26.7 · ♀ 36% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Osteosclerosis2026.5
17.1–41.2ROR 26.6 · χ² 460 / p 3e-102
25.6 EB05 17.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=20no trial data cached
Exposure to toxic agent3623.3
16.8–32.4ROR 23.4 · χ² 739 / p 5e-163
22.8 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=36 · ♀ 36% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Brugada syndrome1122.4
12.4–40.6ROR 22.5 · χ² 202 / p 4e-46
21.2 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=11no trial data cached
Gastric ph decreased1122.3
12.3–40.4ROR 22.3 · χ² 201 / p 7e-46
21.1 EB05 12.1 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=11no trial data cached
Vaginal discharge10521.8
18.0–26.4ROR 22.0 · χ² 2,043 / p <1e-300
21.5 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=105 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Electrocardiogram qrs complex prolonged5321.6
16.5–28.3ROR 21.7 · χ² 1,011 / p 4e-222
21.3 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=53 · ♀ 31% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Intentional product use issue86820.6
19.3–21.9ROR 22.4 · χ² 16,056 / p <1e-300
20.4 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Paraesthesia oral13619.7
16.7–23.3ROR 20.0 · χ² 2,377 / p <1e-300
19.5 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 31.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Vascular device infection4118.9
13.9–25.7ROR 19.0 · χ² 672 / p 2e-148
18.6 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=41 · 90% clinicianno trial data cached
Oral candidiasis (oral thrush)11818.9
15.8–22.6ROR 19.1 · χ² 1,965 / p <1e-300
18.7 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 24.4 · ♀ 97% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Vanishing bile duct syndrome1018.8
10.1–35.0ROR 18.8 · χ² 149 / p 1e-34
17.3 EB05 9.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=10no trial data cached
Forced expiratory volume decreased2316.9
11.2–25.4ROR 16.9 · χ² 325 / p 6e-73
16.4 EB05 11.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 91% clinicianno trial data cached
Gastrointestinal stoma complication1216.0
9.1–28.2ROR 16.0 · χ² 153 / p 2e-35
14.7 EB05 8.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=12no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,2862.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.2 · χ² 703 / p 3e-155
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,2744.1
3.9–4.3ROR 4.5 · χ² 3,068 / p <1e-300
4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.5no trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)9762.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.5 · χ² 766 / p 6e-169
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Intentional product use issue86820.6
19.3–21.9ROR 22.4 · χ² 16,056 / p <1e-300
20.4 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.7 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Nausea7592.0
1.9–2.1ROR 2.1 · χ² 386 / p 3e-86
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.0 · ♀ 82% (drug 60%)no trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)6361.7
1.6–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 186 / p 1e-42
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Constipation5525.3
4.9–5.7ROR 5.5 · χ² 1,926 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.8no trial data cached
Pyrexia (fever)4582.7
2.5–3.0ROR 2.8 · χ² 510 / p 3e-113
2.7 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.1no trial data cached
Incorrect product administration duration44446.2
42.1–50.6ROR 48.3 · χ² 19,170 / p <1e-300
45.1 EB05 41.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=10 · 99% consumerno trial data cached
Weight decreased (weight loss)4073.0
2.7–3.3ROR 3.1 · χ² 553 / p 1e-122
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 3.9no trial data cached
Vomiting4021.8
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 137 / p 5e-32
1.8 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Abdominal pain3943.5
3.2–3.9ROR 3.6 · χ² 709 / p 1e-156
3.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 4.0no trial data cached
Headache3891.3
1.2–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Malaise (feeling unwell)3871.8
1.6–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 145 / p 1e-33
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 2.7no trial data cached
Pain3751.3
1.1–1.4ROR 1.3 · χ² 20 / p 3e-6
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Loperamide ↔ QT prolongation.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Loperamide?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Loperamide are diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue, constipation, pyrexia, weight decreased. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Loperamide have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Loperamide has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Loperamide causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.