← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Naltrexone and Bupropion side effects: what 8,477 FDA adverse event reports show

Naltrexone Hydrochloride And Bupropion Hydrochloride · 898 reaction terms · 30,296 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Naltrexone (Naltrexone)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

8,477 reports · 33% serious · 29 with death outcome · 89% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Treatment with naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension should be part of a comprehensive management program that includes psychosocial support. Naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension contains naltrexone, an opioid antagonis.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Naltrexone for extended-release injectable suspension is supplied as a microsphere formulation of naltrexone for suspension, to be administered by deep intramuscular injection by a healthcare practitioner.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 2Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 7Not in label — unassessed 30
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 858 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Lack of concomitant drug effect11624.2
322.0–1,210.0ROR 625.0 · χ² 4,965 / p <1e-300
266.9 EB05 159.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Cervicogenic headache18385.3
234.5–633.1ROR 386.1 · χ² 5,631 / p <1e-300
246.1 EB05 164.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Drug titration error333365.8
326.7–409.7ROR 380.8 · χ² 105,059 / p <1e-300
312.6 EB05 285.4 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=251 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Pineal gland cyst18363.0
221.3–595.3ROR 363.8 · χ² 5,345 / p <1e-300
236.8 EB05 158.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Labelled drug-food interaction issue14237.2
137.1–410.5ROR 237.6 · χ² 2,790 / p <1e-300
167.4 EB05 106.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=6no trial data cached
Labelled drug-drug interaction issue88165.4
133.4–205.1ROR 167.2 · χ² 13,316 / p <1e-300
150.0 EB05 125.5 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=73 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Migraine without aura18158.6
98.5–255.3ROR 158.9 · χ² 2,500 / p <1e-300
128.9 EB05 86.3 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=18no trial data cached
Food craving206107.3
93.5–123.2ROR 109.9 · χ² 20,681 / p <1e-300
101.9 EB05 90.7 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=158 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Contraindicated drug administered2797.9
66.7–143.7ROR 98.2 · χ² 2,397 / p <1e-300
88.4 EB05 63.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11no trial data cached
Contraindicated product prescribed5076.3
57.6–101.0ROR 76.7 · χ² 3,531 / p <1e-300
72.1 EB05 56.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=45 · 84% consumerno trial data cached
Food aversion4771.7
53.7–95.7ROR 72.1 · χ² 3,114 / p <1e-300
67.8 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=38 · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Alcohol intolerance1657.2
34.9–93.9ROR 57.4 · χ² 810 / p 2e-178
52.7 EB05 34.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=15no trial data cached
Labelled drug-food interaction medication error1155.2
30.4–100.4ROR 55.3 · χ² 521 / p 1e-115
49.7 EB05 29.6 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Cyclic vomiting syndrome1040.2
21.5–75.1ROR 40.2 · χ² 338 / p 7e-76
37.0 EB05 21.4 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Nonspecific reaction7836.3
29.1–45.4ROR 36.6 · χ² 2,605 / p <1e-300
35.5 EB05 29.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8 · 92% consumerno trial data cached
Binge eating1330.3
17.5–52.3ROR 30.3 · χ² 335 / p 3e-75
28.8 EB05 17.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Hunger15729.2
25.0–34.1ROR 29.7 · χ² 4,202 / p <1e-300
28.8 EB05 25.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=108 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Drug dose titration not performed2029.0
18.7–45.1ROR 29.1 · χ² 508 / p 9e-113
28.0 EB05 19.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Inability to afford medication9223.4
19.0–28.6ROR 23.6 · χ² 1,929 / p <1e-300
23.0 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=71 · 96% consumerno trial data cached
Intentional underdose5719.5
15.0–25.3ROR 19.6 · χ² 974 / p 4e-214
19.2 EB05 15.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Energy increased4619.3
14.5–25.8ROR 19.4 · χ² 774 / p 1e-170
19.0 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 83% consumerno trial data cached
Biliary colic2219.1
12.5–29.0ROR 19.1 · χ² 356 / p 9e-80
18.6 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Contraindicated product administered22218.3
16.1–20.9ROR 18.8 · χ² 3,599 / p <1e-300
18.2 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 33.2 · 75% consumerno trial data cached
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome1017.8
9.6–33.2ROR 17.9 · χ² 142 / p 6e-33
16.3 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Product prescribing error16317.1
14.7–20.0ROR 17.5 · χ² 2,447 / p <1e-300
17.0 EB05 14.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 29.8no trial data cached
Feeling jittery12716.6
13.9–19.7ROR 16.8 · χ² 1,830 / p <1e-300
16.4 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Motion sickness1114.3
7.9–25.8ROR 14.3 · χ² 122 / p 1e-28
12.6 EB05 6.6 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3no trial data cached
Hangover2014.1
9.1–21.8ROR 14.1 · χ² 228 / p 7e-52
13.3 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · 70% consumerno trial data cached
Tunnel vision1013.4
7.2–24.9ROR 13.4 · χ² 102 / p 3e-24
11.4 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Gastric bypass1112.6
6.9–22.7ROR 12.6 · χ² 105 / p 6e-25
10.7 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Labelled drug-drug interaction medication error4412.3
9.1–16.5ROR 12.3 · χ² 441 / p 3e-98
11.9 EB05 9.1 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 12.6no trial data cached
Foreign body in throat1411.4
6.8–19.3ROR 11.5 · χ² 123 / p 8e-29
10.0 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Brain fog6611.2
8.8–14.3ROR 11.3 · χ² 603 / p 2e-133
11.0 EB05 8.8 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.4 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Taste disorder789.7
7.7–12.1ROR 9.7 · χ² 595 / p 9e-132
9.4 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 27.9 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Postmenopausal haemorrhage109.6
5.2–17.9ROR 9.6 · χ² 69 / p 6e-17
7.6 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Faeces hard159.6
5.8–15.9ROR 9.6 · χ² 107 / p 3e-25
8.2 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Hyperphagia159.4
5.7–15.6ROR 9.4 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
8.0 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Symptom recurrence229.3
6.1–14.1ROR 9.3 · χ² 154 / p 1e-35
8.3 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 91% consumerno trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea1,9846.2
6.0–6.5ROR 7.8 · χ² 9,031 / p <1e-300
6.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.9 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Headache1,1124.4
4.2–4.6ROR 4.9 · χ² 3,002 / p <1e-300
4.4 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.7 · 78% consumerno trial data cached
Dizziness1,0465.2
4.9–5.5ROR 5.8 · χ² 3,629 / p <1e-300
5.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 6.5 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Vomiting6753.6
3.3–3.8ROR 3.8 · χ² 1,270 / p 2e-278
3.6 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.5 · 73% consumerno trial data cached
Constipation6477.4
6.9–8.0ROR 7.9 · χ² 3,611 / p <1e-300
7.4 EB05 6.9 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 12.3 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Feeling abnormal5836.0
5.6–6.5ROR 6.4 · χ² 2,451 / p <1e-300
6.0 EB05 5.6 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.5 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)5241.7
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 145 / p 1e-33
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Anxiety4053.5
3.2–3.9ROR 3.6 · χ² 735 / p 3e-162
3.5 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.7 · 74% consumerno trial data cached
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)3953.7
3.3–4.0ROR 3.8 · χ² 772 / p 3e-170
3.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.2 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)3741.4
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 51 / p 4e-13
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.1 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)3670.7
0.6–0.8ROR 0.7 · χ² 54 / p 8e-14
0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.7 · 72% consumerno trial data cached
Tremor (shaking)3355.0
4.5–5.5ROR 5.2 · χ² 1,072 / p 2e-235
5.0 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.1 · 80% consumerno trial data cached
Drug titration error333365.8
326.7–409.7ROR 380.8 · χ² 105,059 / p <1e-300
312.6 EB05 285.4 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=251 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Illness3328.2
7.4–9.1ROR 8.5 · χ² 2,094 / p <1e-300
8.1 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.5 · 88% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Naltrexone ↔ Drug withdrawal syndrome.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Naltrexone and Bupropion?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Naltrexone and Bupropion are nausea, headache, dizziness, vomiting, constipation, feeling abnormal. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Naltrexone and Bupropion have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Naltrexone and Bupropion has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Naltrexone and Bupropion causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.