← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Omeprazole Magnesium side effects: what 444,238 FDA adverse event reports show

Omeprazole Magnesium · 1,148 reaction terms · 1,697,357 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Proton Pump Inhibitor

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

444,238 reports · 72% serious · 39,121 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) indicated for the: • Treatment of active duodenal ulcer in adults (1.1) • Eradication of Helicobacter pylori to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence in adults (1.2) • Treatment of active benign gastri.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

6-methoxy-2-[(4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)methylsulfinyl]-1H-benzimidazole is a sulfoxide and a member of benzimidazoles.

PubChem CID 4594 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 2Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 2Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,108 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Renal haemangioma7916,006.8
2,690.4–13,411.2ROR 6,017.5 · calibrated p 2e-21 ✓
46.2 EB05 43.5 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.4 (5.0–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=791 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion2,370164.4
150.8–179.2ROR 165.2 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
36.4 EB05 35.2 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.2 (6.0–6.5)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=2,364 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cardiospasm394114.3
95.0–137.6ROR 114.4 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
33.2 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 3.5 (3.1–3.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=394not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder753111.0
97.3–126.8ROR 111.2 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
33.0 EB05 31.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.8 (6.3–7.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=752not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia2,96782.1
77.3–87.2ROR 82.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
29.9 EB05 29.0 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.7 (6.4–7.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2,967not reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease10,57463.4
61.5–65.2ROR 64.9 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
27.1 EB05 26.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.6 (5.5–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 21.7not reported in cached trials
Palmoplantar keratoderma38654.1
46.7–62.7ROR 54.2 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
25.3 EB05 23.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 3.5 (3.1–3.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=386not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary1,34052.7
48.7–57.0ROR 52.8 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
25.0 EB05 23.9 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.9 (6.5–7.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,340not reported in cached trials
Hypertensive nephropathy53045.1
40.0–50.9ROR 45.2 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
23.2 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 4.8 (4.4–5.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=530 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease36,74843.0
42.5–43.7ROR 46.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
22.6 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.6 (5.6–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 16.4 · serious PRR 17.9not reported in cached trials
Hyperchlorhydria2,75840.4
38.4–42.6ROR 40.7 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
21.9 EB05 21.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.6 (8.2–9.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,904 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Renal injury9,73022.3
21.8–22.8ROR 22.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
15.3 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.6 (5.5–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.3not reported in cached trials
Tubulointerstitial nephritis5,32518.4
17.9–19.0ROR 18.6 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
13.4 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.1 (5.9–6.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 7.9 · serious PRR 10.8NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Diabetic nephropathy55415.5
14.1–17.0ROR 15.5 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
11.8 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.0 (4.5–5.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=551 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sedation complication61115.0
13.7–16.4ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
11.5 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 17.7 (15.8–19.8)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=608 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Atrial tachycardia48013.7
12.3–15.1ROR 13.7 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
10.7 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 3.9 (3.5–4.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=478not reported in cached trials
Rebound effect2,39412.4
11.9–13.0ROR 12.5 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
10.0 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 9.6 (9.1–10.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Hypomagnesaemia2,70911.2
10.8–11.7ROR 11.3 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓
9.2 EB05 8.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.6 (8.2–8.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 10.0 · serious PRR 7.5 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance decreased6799.4
8.6–10.2ROR 9.4 · calibrated p 0.040 ✓
7.9 EB05 7.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 17.7 (15.9–19.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=669 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)not reported in cached trials
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)23,9108.6
8.5–8.7ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
7.4 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.9 (5.8–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.5 · serious PRR 5.9not reported in cached trials
Nephropathy1,4118.2
7.7–8.7ROR 8.2 · calibrated p 0.062
7.1 EB05 6.8 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.1 (4.8–5.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.0not reported in cached trials
Carotid artery occlusion5327.9
7.2–8.6ROR 7.9 · calibrated p 0.070
6.8 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 4.2 (3.8–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=528not reported in cached trials
Essential hypertension3717.7
6.9–8.6ROR 7.7 · calibrated p 0.074
6.7 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.0 (7.0–9.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=348not reported in cached trials
Tension headache5286.5
5.9–7.1ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.123
5.8 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 4.1 (3.7–4.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=488not reported in cached trials
Hiatus hernia1,5136.1
5.8–6.4ROR 6.1 · calibrated p 0.142
5.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 7.2 (6.8–7.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.2not reported in cached trials
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (acid reflux)9,3096.1
5.9–6.2ROR 6.2 · calibrated p 0.139
5.5 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.8 (5.7–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 5.3 · serious PRR 5.0not reported in cached trials
Renal cyst8665.6
5.3–6.1ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.175
5.1 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.2 (5.7–6.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3not reported in cached trials
Sleep terror4195.1
4.6–5.7ROR 5.1 · calibrated p 0.223
4.7 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 3.6 (3.3–4.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=407not reported in cached trials
Blood calcium decreased1,1175.1
4.8–5.4ROR 5.1 · calibrated p 0.225
4.7 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 11.2 (10.4–12.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 4.4not reported in cached trials
Hypocalcaemia (low calcium)1,8525.0
4.8–5.3ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.230
4.6 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.0 (7.5–8.4)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 5.2 · serious PRR 3.9 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis5184.8
4.4–5.3ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.255
4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 12.9 (11.5–14.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=469not reported in cached trials
Regurgitation3144.7
4.2–5.3ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.274
4.3 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 7.9 (6.9–9.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Spinal osteoarthritis7854.5
4.2–4.9ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.295
4.2 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.2 (7.5–8.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.5not reported in cached trials
Cholecystitis chronic5924.4
4.1–4.8ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.308
4.1 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 9.7 (8.8–10.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)NCT00141102: 1/2,223 (0.0%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Orthostatic hypotension (dizziness on standing)1,5184.4
4.2–4.6ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.309
4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 10.4 (9.8–11.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.6not reported in cached trials
Oesophageal disorder3334.4
3.9–4.9ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.317
4.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 11.1 (9.7–12.8)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
100% consumernot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Kidney injury44,8555.05.0–5.1signal
Hyponatraemia5,3153.33.2–3.4signal
Gi bleeding8,6202.32.2–2.3signal
Anaemia12,3712.02.0–2.0raised
Arrhythmia / qt7,8071.91.9–2.0raised
Fall / fracture14,9511.91.9–1.9raised
Pancreatitis3,0741.81.8–1.9raised
Serious infection28,2091.81.7–1.8raised
Depression10,0201.71.7–1.7raised
Venous thromboembolism7,5531.71.6–1.7raised
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy2,7911.61.6–1.7raised
Tendon disorder1,2791.61.5–1.7raised
Heart failure5,8331.61.5–1.6raised
Severe cutaneous reaction2,4121.51.5–1.6raised
Thrombocytopenia7,1331.51.5–1.6raised
Interstitial lung disease2,7191.31.3–1.4raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Omeprazole as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (3 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Chronic kidney disease36,74843.0
42.5–43.7ROR 46.8 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
22.6 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.6 (5.6–5.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 16.4 · serious PRR 17.9not reported in cached trials
Nausea26,8361.6
1.6–1.6ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.749
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.1 (8.0–8.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.6 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00141102: 3/2,237 (0.1%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)26,0281.6
1.6–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.731
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.8 (8.7–8.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)25,4141.9
1.9–1.9ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.919
1.9 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.2 (8.2–8.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.7NCT00141102: 2/2,237 (0.1%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)23,9108.6
8.5–8.7ROR 9.1 · calibrated p 0.045 ✓
7.4 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 5.9 (5.8–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.5 · serious PRR 5.9not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)22,8480.8
0.8–0.8ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.187
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 7.8 (7.7–7.8)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.0 · serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)20,9931.8
1.8–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.841
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.0 (7.9–8.0)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.6 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Pain20,3171.6
1.6–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.710
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.3 (8.2–8.4)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.4NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Headache19,3061.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.636
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 7.6 (7.5–7.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.5NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Vomiting17,2821.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.829
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 7.7 (7.6–7.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00141102: 2/2,237 (0.1%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Dizziness17,1041.6
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.750
1.6 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.6 (8.5–8.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00141102: 2/2,237 (0.1%) on Omeprazole (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)16,2710.9
0.9–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.229
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.2
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.8 (6.7–6.9)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 0.9 · serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)14,0211.5
1.5–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.667
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 6.8 (6.7–6.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Asthenia (weakness)13,9521.8
1.8–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.833
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.8
vs other Proton Pump Inhibitors: PRR 8.4 (8.3–8.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.6NCT00444275: 2/873 (0.2%) on Omeprazole

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Omeprazole (proton-pump inhibitors) ↔ Chronic kidney disease.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Omeprazole?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Omeprazole are chronic kidney disease, nausea, fatigue, diarrhoea, acute kidney injury, dyspnoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Omeprazole have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Omeprazole has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Omeprazole causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.