← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amlodipine and Benazepril side effects: what 634 FDA adverse event reports show

Amlodipine Besylate And Benazepril Hydrochloride · 1,072 reaction terms · 37,765 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Calcium channel blocker and may be

FDA label, Indications wording of the closest related product

Label matched

Amlodipine (Katerzia)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

634 reports · 57% serious · 66 with death outcome · 46% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

KATERZIA is a calcium channel blocker and may be used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive and antianginal agents for the treatment of: Hypertension ( 1.1 ) KATERZIA is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in adults and children 6 years and older, to lower blood pressure.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

KATERZIA oral suspension contains 1.30 mg/mL amlodipine benzoate, equivalent to 1 mg/mL amlodipine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker. Amlodipine benzoate is chemically described as 3-Ethy.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 14Not in label — unassessed 26
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,032 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Angioneurotic oedema7060.7
47.9–76.9ROR 61.2 · χ² 3,947 / p <1e-300
58.3 EB05 47.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Hyperparathyroidism secondary4238.5
28.4–52.2ROR 38.7 · χ² 1,472 / p <1e-300
37.3 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder1736.7
22.7–59.2ROR 36.7 · χ² 546 / p 6e-121
34.8 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=5no trial data cached
Brash syndrome2034.2
22.0–53.1ROR 34.2 · χ² 602 / p 3e-133
32.7 EB05 22.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Sick sinus syndrome1529.8
17.9–49.5ROR 29.8 · χ² 384 / p 9e-86
28.4 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Blood pressure inadequately controlled7528.6
22.8–35.9ROR 28.8 · χ² 1,945 / p <1e-300
28.1 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=3no trial data cached
Nephrogenic anaemia5426.7
20.4–34.9ROR 26.8 · χ² 1,294 / p 1e-283
26.2 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=7no trial data cached
Diabetes mellitus non-insulin-dependent1726.7
16.5–43.0ROR 26.7 · χ² 390 / p 4e-87
25.7 EB05 16.9 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Joint sprain1226.1
14.8–46.2ROR 26.2 · χ² 263 / p 2e-59
24.9 EB05 15.0 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Colonic polyp1824.8
15.6–39.4ROR 24.8 · χ² 383 / p 1e-85
24.0 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Hypertensive heart disease1822.0
13.9–35.0ROR 22.1 · χ² 338 / p 1e-75
21.3 EB05 14.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
–no trial data cached
Muscle cramp1620.5
12.5–33.5ROR 20.5 · χ² 275 / p 5e-62
19.7 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Lumbar radiculopathy1019.7
10.6–36.7ROR 19.7 · χ² 158 / p 2e-36
18.3 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Carotid artery stenosis2617.0
11.6–25.0ROR 17.1 · χ² 374 / p 1e-83
16.6 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Rebound acid hypersecretion2216.5
10.9–25.1ROR 16.5 · χ² 303 / p 4e-68
16.0 EB05 10.8 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=4no trial data cached
Ventricular hypertrophy1614.5
8.9–23.7ROR 14.5 · χ² 187 / p 7e-43
13.6 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Lacunar infarction1514.4
8.7–23.9ROR 14.4 · χ² 173 / p 9e-40
13.4 EB05 7.9 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1no trial data cached
Diabetic neuropathy3114.3
10.1–20.4ROR 14.3 · χ² 368 / p 2e-82
13.9 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Concomitant disease progression1214.0
7.9–24.6ROR 14.0 · χ² 131 / p 1e-30
12.5 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy1813.3
8.4–21.2ROR 13.4 · χ² 192 / p 5e-44
12.4 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Coronary artery disease17212.9
11.2–15.0ROR 13.2 · χ² 1,876 / p <1e-300
12.8 EB05 11.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 3.3no trial data cached
End stage renal disease10312.8
10.6–15.6ROR 13.0 · χ² 1,107 / p 4e-243
12.7 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 18.0no trial data cached
Stomach discomfort2912.7
8.8–18.3ROR 12.7 · χ² 300 / p 2e-67
12.2 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Left ventricular hypertrophy2211.8
7.8–17.9ROR 11.8 · χ² 205 / p 7e-47
10.9 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1no trial data cached
Renal failure chronic4011.8
8.6–16.1ROR 11.8 · χ² 382 / p 3e-85
11.3 EB05 8.5 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.3no trial data cached
Spinal column stenosis2411.5
7.7–17.2ROR 11.5 · χ² 219 / p 9e-50
10.7 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1no trial data cached
Difficulty in walking1711.2
6.9–18.0ROR 11.2 · χ² 147 / p 4e-34
10.0 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Therapeutic agent toxicity1610.9
6.6–17.7ROR 10.9 · χ² 133 / p 5e-31
9.5 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Angina unstable3110.8
7.6–15.4ROR 10.9 · χ² 266 / p 4e-60
10.2 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Tricuspid valve incompetence3710.7
7.8–14.8ROR 10.8 · χ² 316 / p 6e-71
10.2 EB05 7.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Excoriation1210.7
6.1–18.8ROR 10.7 · χ² 95 / p 7e-23
8.9 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Mitral valve incompetence5110.3
7.9–13.6ROR 10.4 · χ² 419 / p 2e-93
9.9 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Peripheral vascular disorder2310.2
6.8–15.3ROR 10.2 · χ² 180 / p 2e-41
9.2 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Essential hypertension119.7
5.4–17.6ROR 9.7 · χ² 77 / p 7e-19
7.8 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Hyperlipidaemia489.2
6.9–12.2ROR 9.2 · χ² 341 / p 2e-76
8.7 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
–no trial data cached
Cardiomegaly499.1
6.8–12.0ROR 9.1 · χ² 342 / p 1e-76
8.6 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 2.8no trial data cached
Diastolic dysfunction128.9
5.0–15.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 76 / p 2e-18
7.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
–no trial data cached
Rhinitis allergic178.8
5.4–14.1ROR 8.8 · χ² 109 / p 8e-26
7.5 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–no trial data cached
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery258.7
5.9–12.8ROR 8.7 · χ² 162 / p 3e-37
7.8 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive3058.6
7.7–9.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 2,047 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Nausea6211.8
1.7–1.9ROR 1.9 · χ² 228 / p 9e-52
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.3 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)5331.6
1.4–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 113 / p 1e-26
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6 · 82% consumerno trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5270.9
0.8–1.0ROR 0.9 · χ² 4 / p 0.018
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.8 · 76% consumerno trial data cached
Dizziness4802.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.3 · χ² 322 / p 3e-72
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.1no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4551.6
1.5–1.8ROR 1.6 · χ² 110 / p 6e-26
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.5 · 77% consumerno trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)4271.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.8 · χ² 133 / p 5e-31
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7 · ♀ 72% (drug 46%)no trial data cached
Headache4171.5
1.4–1.7ROR 1.5 · χ² 76 / p 1e-18
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8 · ♀ 71% (drug 46%) · 81% consumerno trial data cached
Pain4001.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 65 / p 4e-16
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.2no trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)3862.3
2.1–2.6ROR 2.4 · χ² 302 / p 6e-68
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5no trial data cached
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)3524.6
4.1–5.1ROR 4.7 · χ² 988 / p 4e-217
4.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 0.4no trial data cached
Renal failure (kidney failure)3215.5
4.9–6.1ROR 5.7 · χ² 1,180 / p 9e-259
5.4 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.3no trial data cached
Hypertension (high blood pressure)3193.4
3.1–3.8ROR 3.5 · χ² 555 / p 7e-123
3.4 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Vomiting3091.5
1.3–1.7ROR 1.5 · χ² 53 / p 2e-13
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Cerebrovascular accident (stroke)3064.1
3.7–4.6ROR 4.2 · χ² 723 / p 1e-159
4.1 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 0.2no trial data cached
Cardiac failure congestive3058.6
7.7–9.6ROR 8.9 · χ² 2,047 / p <1e-300
8.5 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Amlodipine (dihydropyridine CCBs) ↔ Peripheral oedema.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amlodipine and Benazepril?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amlodipine and Benazepril are nausea, fatigue, dizziness, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amlodipine and Benazepril have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Amlodipine and Benazepril has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amlodipine and Benazepril causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.