← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Methadone side effects: what 42,541 FDA adverse event reports show

Methadone · Methadone Hydrochloride · 1,203 reaction terms · 153,241 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Brand names

Methadone Hydrochloride

openFDA label

Who reports

42,541 reports · 86% serious · 13,625 with death outcome · 44% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Methadone hydrochloride tablets is indicated for the: Management of severe and persistent pain that requires an opioid analgesic and that cannot be adequately treated with alternative options, including immediate-release opioids. Limitations of Use Bec.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Methadone hydrochloride is chemically described as 6-(dimethylamino)-4,4-diphenyl-3-hepatanone hydrochloride. Methadone hydrochloride USP is a white powder.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF METHADONE HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS A ddiction, Abuse, and Misuse Because the use of methadone hydrochloride tablets exposes patients and other users to the risks of opioid .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 6Likely indication confounding 2Reporting / coding artifact 9Not in label — unassessed 21
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,163 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vision abnormal neonatal142249.7
204.0–305.7ROR 250.5 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓
161.7 EB05 140.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=142 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infantile back arching28205.9
132.3–320.3ROR 206.0 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
132.0 EB05 95.9 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Visual evoked potentials abnormal27121.3
79.6–185.0ROR 121.4 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
91.2 EB05 65.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neonatal hypoacusis43110.4
79.3–153.7ROR 110.5 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
86.8 EB05 67.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Victim of child abuse45109.7
79.4–151.7ROR 109.9 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
86.5 EB05 67.3 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Child abuse45108.1
78.3–149.3ROR 108.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
85.5 EB05 66.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=45 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%)not reported in cached trials
Substance abuser3391.5
63.1–132.7ROR 91.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
74.0 EB05 55.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Visceral congestion7689.5
70.1–114.3ROR 89.7 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
74.4 EB05 61.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=76 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Epidural lipomatosis5184.5
62.8–113.7ROR 84.6 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
70.3 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Learning disability64967.4
62.1–73.1ROR 68.4 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
59.2 EB05 55.5 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=649 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bradypnoea24549.4
43.4–56.4ROR 49.7 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
44.8 EB05 40.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=245 · ♀ 24% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Developmental delay72442.6
39.5–45.9ROR 43.3 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
39.2 EB05 36.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 26.5 · 94% consumernot reported in cached trials
Substance use disorder23841.3
36.2–47.1ROR 41.5 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
38.0 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=238not reported in cached trials
Laryngomalacia2641.0
27.5–61.1ROR 41.0 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
36.9 EB05 26.5 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Respiratory depression93340.5
37.9–43.3ROR 41.4 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
37.5 EB05 35.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 25.7not reported in cached trials
Housebound3040.3
27.8–58.5ROR 40.4 · calibrated p 9e-5 ✓
36.5 EB05 26.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=30 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Myocardial fibrosis5937.1
28.5–48.4ROR 37.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
34.2 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ventricular tachyarrhythmia2134.2
22.0–53.2ROR 34.2 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓
31.2 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypertonia neonatal3433.5
23.6–47.4ROR 33.5 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.9 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Accidental poisoning8432.6
26.2–40.7ROR 32.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
30.5 EB05 25.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=84 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Substance use9331.6
25.6–39.0ROR 31.7 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
29.6 EB05 24.9 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=91 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug abuse4,91730.7
29.9–31.6ROR 34.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
29.0 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 19.4 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug diversion31028.2
25.1–31.6ROR 28.4 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
26.6 EB05 24.2 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=232not reported in cached trials
Substance abuse42427.0
24.5–29.7ROR 27.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
25.6 EB05 23.6 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 18.4not reported in cached trials
Miosis40626.4
23.9–29.2ROR 26.7 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
25.1 EB05 23.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 17.7 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Toxic leukoencephalopathy3625.7
18.4–35.9ROR 25.7 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓
24.2 EB05 18.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 44%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug use disorder35021.7
19.5–24.2ROR 21.9 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
20.8 EB05 19.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 14.3 · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Multiple drug therapy2921.3
14.7–30.9ROR 21.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.2 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=29 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Poisoning51520.9
19.2–22.9ROR 21.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
20.1 EB05 18.7 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.6 · 98% clinicianNCT00315341: 124/520 (23.8%) on Methadone
Exposure via ingestion10220.5
16.8–25.0ROR 20.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.6 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=100 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug dependence5,64617.7
17.3–18.1ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
17.1 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.6 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug detoxification3017.1
11.9–24.7ROR 17.1 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
16.3 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious n=28not reported in cached trials
Asphyxia27016.8
14.9–19.0ROR 16.9 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
16.3 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.9 · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Respiratory acidosis12516.2
13.6–19.3ROR 16.2 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
15.7 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=125 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Methadone as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug dependence5,64617.7
17.3–18.1ROR 20.2 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
17.1 EB05 16.7 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 11.6 · 75% consumernot reported in cached trials
Toxicity to various agents5,30116.0
15.6–16.5ROR 18.2 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
15.6 EB05 15.2 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Drug abuse4,91730.7
29.9–31.6ROR 34.6 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
29.0 EB05 28.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 19.4 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Overdose3,8939.0
8.7–9.3ROR 9.8 · calibrated p 0.034 ✓
8.9 EB05 8.6 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 7.4not reported in cached trials
Pain3,7003.0
2.9–3.1ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.575
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
exact term
serious PRR 2.6NCT00315341: 37/520 (7.1%) on Methadone
Death3,5932.1
2.0–2.1ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.972
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
serious PRR 1.4NCT00315341: 1/520 (0.2%) on Methadone (serious AE)
Emotional distress2,3889.9
9.5–10.3ROR 10.4 · calibrated p 0.028 ✓
9.7 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.4 · 79% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,7670.7
0.6–0.7ROR 0.6 · calibrated p 0.105
0.7 EB05 0.6 · IC025 -0.7
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Foetal exposure during pregnancy1,68010.4
9.9–10.9ROR 10.8 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
10.2 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 6.8not reported in cached trials
Nausea1,6381.0
1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.322
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.9not reported in cached trials
Drug interaction1,6375.1
4.9–5.4ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.205
5.1 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.6not reported in cached trials
Anxiety1,3512.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.864
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)1,3270.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.205
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.3
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 0.7not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methadone ↔ QT prolongation / torsades.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Methadone?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Methadone are toxicity to various agents, pain, emotional distress, drug withdrawal syndrome, nausea, drug withdrawal syndrome neonatal. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Methadone have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF METHADONE HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS A ddiction, Abuse, and Misuse Because the use of methadone hydrochloride tablets exposes patients and other users to the risks of opioid .

Do FAERS signals prove that Methadone causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.