← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Minocycline side effects: what 11,589 FDA adverse event reports show

Minocycline · Zilxi · 1,101 reaction terms · 96,086 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Tetracycline-class drug

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Zilxi

openFDA label

Who reports

11,589 reports · 76% serious · 1,610 with death outcome · 64% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

ZILXI is indicated for the treatment of inflammatory lesions of rosacea in adults . Limitations of Use This formulation of minocycline has not been evaluated in the treatment of infections. To reduce the development of dru.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Minocycline hydrochloride, a semi-synthetic derivative of tetracycline, is [4S‑(4α,4aα,5aα,12aα)]-4,7-bis(dimethylamino)-1,4,4a,5,5a,6,11,12a-octahydro-3,10,12,12a‑tetrahydroxy-1,11-dioxo-2-naphthacenecarboxamide monohydrochloride.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 2Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 35
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,061 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Conjunctival pigmentation201,784.4
960.3–3,315.5ROR 1,787.5 · calibrated p 2e-17 ✓
480.5 EB05 328.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ochronosis331,549.6
972.4–2,469.5ROR 1,554.0 · calibrated p 6e-18 ✓
559.2 EB05 416.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=33 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Type 2 lepra reaction62892.2
658.1–1,209.6ROR 897.0 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓
502.4 EB05 405.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62 · ♀ 18% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Scleral pigmentation28745.7
479.9–1,158.7ROR 747.5 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓
386.8 EB05 280.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15 · ♀ 43% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Polyarteritis nodosa138553.4
457.6–669.2ROR 560.0 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓
399.2 EB05 346.3 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=138 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intestinal sepsis35290.5
203.3–415.0ROR 291.4 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
220.0 EB05 165.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome378246.7
221.9–274.3ROR 255.0 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
214.5 EB05 197.0 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=378 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Thyroiditis acute16234.0
139.0–393.9ROR 234.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
166.3 EB05 108.5 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Onychomadesis445217.2
197.2–239.2ROR 225.8 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
192.1 EB05 177.6 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=445 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever398181.4
163.9–200.8ROR 187.9 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
163.5 EB05 150.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=398 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease341169.0
151.4–188.5ROR 174.1 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
153.1 EB05 140.0 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=340 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Onychomycosis329147.0
131.6–164.2ROR 151.3 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
134.8 EB05 123.0 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=328 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hepatic enzyme10139.4
73.3–265.3ROR 139.5 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
104.2 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris84137.4
110.1–171.4ROR 138.4 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
124.1 EB05 103.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=84 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive491134.3
122.7–146.9ROR 140.2 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
124.4 EB05 115.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 94.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia21132.4
85.0–206.2ROR 132.6 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
111.1 EB05 76.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Conjunctival scar10131.2
69.1–249.3ROR 131.3 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
99.6 EB05 57.8 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10not reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody43124.6
91.5–169.6ROR 125.0 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
110.9 EB05 85.8 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=43 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Retinitis105121.4
99.7–147.8ROR 122.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
111.5 EB05 94.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=105 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Eosinophilic pneumonia acute53118.5
89.8–156.4ROR 119.1 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
107.0 EB05 84.9 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=53 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Overlap syndrome41114.3
83.4–156.7ROR 114.7 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
102.5 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal378113.4
102.4–125.7ROR 117.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
106.2 EB05 97.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=378not reported in cached trials
Blepharospasm361111.8
100.6–124.1ROR 115.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
104.7 EB05 95.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=360 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Duodenal ulcer perforation422110.3
100.2–121.5ROR 114.5 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
103.5 EB05 95.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 78.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Eosinophilic myocarditis41107.6
78.5–147.4ROR 108.0 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
97.1 EB05 74.6 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Finger deformity269106.3
94.1–120.0ROR 108.8 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓
99.7 EB05 90.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=269 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii344102.2
91.8–113.7ROR 105.3 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓
96.2 EB05 88.0 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=344 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site reaction15299.8
84.9–117.4ROR 101.1 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
93.5 EB05 81.7 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=152 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mononeuropathy multiplex2498.4
65.3–148.4ROR 98.7 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
87.1 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Scleral discolouration3395.3
67.2–135.2ROR 95.6 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
86.1 EB05 64.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · ♀ 41% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone erosion17594.0
80.8–109.3ROR 95.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
88.5 EB05 78.0 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=175 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Folliculitis49791.4
83.7–99.9ROR 95.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
86.8 EB05 80.5 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 77.0 · ♀ 98% (drug 64%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection47388.0
80.4–96.4ROR 91.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓
83.7 EB05 77.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 67.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Symblepharon1286.7
48.6–154.7ROR 86.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
73.4 EB05 44.8 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Vasculitis necrotising3283.7
58.8–119.3ROR 84.0 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
76.5 EB05 56.7 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired2483.3
55.4–125.4ROR 83.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
75.1 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus53481.2
74.6–88.4ROR 85.1 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
77.5 EB05 72.1 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 58.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury35281.1
73.0–90.1ROR 83.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
77.3 EB05 70.7 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 63.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Minocycline as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)1,9522.7
2.6–2.8ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.618
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.8not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,4743.1
2.9–3.2ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.516
3.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 3.8not reported in cached trials
Nausea1,0612.4
2.3–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.780
2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.0 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%)NCT03142451: 1/494 (0.2%) on Minocycline (serious AE)
Pain1,0103.0
2.8–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.576
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.3NCT03142451: 1/256 (0.4%) on Minocycline (serious AE)
Arthralgia (joint pain)9884.3
4.1–4.6ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.279
4.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.6 · ♀ 91% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)9412.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.904
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.7NCT03142451: 1/494 (0.2%) on Minocycline (serious AE)
Rash8963.7
3.5–4.0ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.383
3.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 5.1not reported in cached trials
Drug intolerance89617.0
16.0–18.1ROR 18.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
16.8 EB05 15.9 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 20.3 · ♀ 86% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid arthritis86413.9
13.1–14.9ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
13.8 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 12.7 · ♀ 93% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Joint swelling85713.0
12.1–13.8ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓
12.9 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.4 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Headache7902.3
2.1–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.867
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1 · ♀ 87% (drug 64%)NCT04608500: 11/514 (2.1%) on Minocycline
Condition aggravated7464.5
4.2–4.8ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.268
4.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 4.7 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)7362.1
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.980
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Minocycline ↔ Skin hyperpigmentation.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Minocycline?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Minocycline are nausea, pain, arthralgia, fatigue, rash, drug hypersensitivity. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Minocycline have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Minocycline has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Minocycline causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.