Minocycline side effects: what 11,589 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Tetracycline-class drug
Brand names
Zilxi
Who reports
11,589 reports · 76% serious · 1,610 with death outcome · 64% female
Used for
ZILXI is indicated for the treatment of inflammatory lesions of rosacea in adults . Limitations of Use This formulation of minocycline has not been evaluated in the treatment of infections. To reduce the development of dru.
What it is
Minocycline hydrochloride, a semi-synthetic derivative of tetracycline, is [4S‑(4α,4aα,5aα,12aα)]-4,7-bis(dimethylamino)-1,4,4a,5,5a,6,11,12a-octahydro-3,10,12,12a‑tetrahydroxy-1,11-dioxo-2-naphthacenecarboxamide monohydrochloride.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,061 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bone hyperpigmentation | 56 | 3,997.0 2,495.4–6,402.3ROR 4,016.4 · calibrated p 6e-23 ✓ | 866.0 EB05 691.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=33 · ♀ 35% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Conjunctival pigmentation | 20 | 1,784.4 960.3–3,315.5ROR 1,787.5 · calibrated p 2e-17 ✓ | 480.5 EB05 328.4 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=10 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Ochronosis | 33 | 1,549.6 972.4–2,469.5ROR 1,554.0 · calibrated p 6e-18 ✓ | 559.2 EB05 416.7 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=33 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Type 2 lepra reaction | 62 | 892.2 658.1–1,209.6ROR 897.0 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓ | 502.4 EB05 405.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=62 · ♀ 18% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Scleral pigmentation | 28 | 745.7 479.9–1,158.7ROR 747.5 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓ | 386.8 EB05 280.8 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=15 · ♀ 43% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Polyarteritis nodosa | 138 | 553.4 457.6–669.2ROR 560.0 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓ | 399.2 EB05 346.3 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=138 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Intestinal sepsis | 35 | 290.5 203.3–415.0ROR 291.4 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 220.0 EB05 165.4 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=35 · ♀ 0% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Facet joint syndrome | 378 | 246.7 221.9–274.3ROR 255.0 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 214.5 EB05 197.0 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=378 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Thyroiditis acute | 16 | 234.0 139.0–393.9ROR 234.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 166.3 EB05 108.5 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=16 | not reported in cached trials |
| Onychomadesis | 445 | 217.2 197.2–239.2ROR 225.8 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 192.1 EB05 177.6 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=445 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatic fever | 398 | 181.4 163.9–200.8ROR 187.9 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓ | 163.5 EB05 150.5 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=398 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Peripheral venous disease | 341 | 169.0 151.4–188.5ROR 174.1 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 153.1 EB05 140.0 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=340 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Onychomycosis | 329 | 147.0 131.6–164.2ROR 151.3 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓ | 134.8 EB05 123.0 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=328 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hepatic enzyme | 10 | 139.4 73.3–265.3ROR 139.5 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 104.2 EB05 60.5 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Lupus vulgaris | 84 | 137.4 110.1–171.4ROR 138.4 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 124.1 EB05 103.4 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=84 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive | 491 | 134.3 122.7–146.9ROR 140.2 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓ | 124.4 EB05 115.4 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 94.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypocholesterolaemia | 21 | 132.4 85.0–206.2ROR 132.6 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓ | 111.1 EB05 76.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=21 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Conjunctival scar | 10 | 131.2 69.1–249.3ROR 131.3 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 99.6 EB05 57.8 · IC025 +3.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=10 | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody | 43 | 124.6 91.5–169.6ROR 125.0 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 110.9 EB05 85.8 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=43 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Retinitis | 105 | 121.4 99.7–147.8ROR 122.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 111.5 EB05 94.7 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=105 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Eosinophilic pneumonia acute | 53 | 118.5 89.8–156.4ROR 119.1 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓ | 107.0 EB05 84.9 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=53 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Overlap syndrome | 41 | 114.3 83.4–156.7ROR 114.7 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓ | 102.5 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| C-reactive protein abnormal | 378 | 113.4 102.4–125.7ROR 117.2 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 106.2 EB05 97.5 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=378 | not reported in cached trials |
| Blepharospasm | 361 | 111.8 100.6–124.1ROR 115.3 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 104.7 EB05 95.9 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=360 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Duodenal ulcer perforation | 422 | 110.3 100.2–121.5ROR 114.5 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 103.5 EB05 95.5 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 78.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Eosinophilic myocarditis | 41 | 107.6 78.5–147.4ROR 108.0 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 97.1 EB05 74.6 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=41 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Finger deformity | 269 | 106.3 94.1–120.0ROR 108.8 · calibrated p 7e-8 ✓ | 99.7 EB05 90.1 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=269 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Breast cancer stage iii | 344 | 102.2 91.8–113.7ROR 105.3 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓ | 96.2 EB05 88.0 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=344 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Infusion site reaction | 152 | 99.8 84.9–117.4ROR 101.1 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓ | 93.5 EB05 81.7 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=152 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Mononeuropathy multiplex | 24 | 98.4 65.3–148.4ROR 98.7 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 87.1 EB05 61.6 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Scleral discolouration | 33 | 95.3 67.2–135.2ROR 95.6 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 86.1 EB05 64.2 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=11 · ♀ 41% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone erosion | 175 | 94.0 80.8–109.3ROR 95.4 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 88.5 EB05 78.0 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=175 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Folliculitis | 497 | 91.4 83.7–99.9ROR 95.5 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 86.8 EB05 80.5 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 77.0 · ♀ 98% (drug 64%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Helicobacter infection | 473 | 88.0 80.4–96.4ROR 91.7 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 83.7 EB05 77.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 67.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Symblepharon | 12 | 86.7 48.6–154.7ROR 86.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 73.4 EB05 44.8 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=12 | not reported in cached trials |
| Nail disorder | 389 | 84.8 76.7–93.7ROR 87.7 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓ | 80.7 EB05 74.2 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=385 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Vasculitis necrotising | 32 | 83.7 58.8–119.3ROR 84.0 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓ | 76.5 EB05 56.7 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=31 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired | 24 | 83.3 55.4–125.4ROR 83.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 75.1 EB05 53.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=24 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Pemphigus | 534 | 81.2 74.6–88.4ROR 85.1 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 77.5 EB05 72.1 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 58.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Muscle injury | 352 | 81.1 73.0–90.1ROR 83.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 77.3 EB05 70.7 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 63.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Minocycline as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT04608500 — A Study (Study 2) to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of FMX103 1.5% Topical Minocycline Foam in the Treatment (N=771, PHASE3; 7 AE terms posted; arms: FMX103 1.5%; Vehicle Foam)
- NCT03142451 — A Study (Study 1) to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of FMX103 1.5% Topical Minocycline Foam in the Treatment (N=751, PHASE3; 13 AE terms posted; arms: FMX103 1.5%; Vehicle Foam)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 1,952 | 2.7 2.6–2.8ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.618 | 2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 4.8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 1,474 | 3.1 2.9–3.2ROR 3.4 · calibrated p 0.516 | 3.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 3.8 | not reported in cached trials |
| Nausea | 1,061 | 2.4 2.3–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.780 | 2.4 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.0 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%) | NCT03142451: 1/494 (0.2%) on Minocycline (serious AE) |
| Pain | 1,010 | 3.0 2.8–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.576 | 3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 3.3 | NCT03142451: 1/256 (0.4%) on Minocycline (serious AE) |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 988 | 4.3 4.1–4.6ROR 4.6 · calibrated p 0.279 | 4.3 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.6 · ♀ 91% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 941 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.904 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 2.7 | NCT03142451: 1/494 (0.2%) on Minocycline (serious AE) |
| Rash | 896 | 3.7 3.5–4.0ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.383 | 3.7 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 5.1 | not reported in cached trials |
| Drug intolerance | 896 | 17.0 16.0–18.1ROR 18.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓ | 16.8 EB05 15.9 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 20.3 · ♀ 86% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Drug hypersensitivity | 893 | 8.4 7.8–8.9ROR 9.0 · calibrated p 0.047 ✓ | 8.3 EB05 7.8 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 15.2 · ♀ 87% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 864 | 13.9 13.1–14.9ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓ | 13.8 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 12.7 · ♀ 93% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Joint swelling | 857 | 13.0 12.1–13.8ROR 13.9 · calibrated p 0.010 ✓ | 12.9 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 16.4 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Headache | 790 | 2.3 2.1–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.867 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 3.1 · ♀ 87% (drug 64%) | NCT04608500: 11/514 (2.1%) on Minocycline |
| Condition aggravated | 746 | 4.5 4.2–4.8ROR 4.7 · calibrated p 0.268 | 4.5 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious PRR 4.7 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Diarrhoea (diarrhea) | 736 | 2.1 1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.980 | 2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 2.3 | not reported in cached trials |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 734 | 4.1 3.8–4.4ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.323 | 4.1 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious PRR 3.2 | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Conjunctival pigmentation — n=20, PRR 1,784.4
- Ochronosis — n=33, PRR 1,549.6
- Type 2 lepra reaction — n=62, PRR 892.2
- Scleral pigmentation — n=28, PRR 745.7
- Polyarteritis nodosa — n=138, PRR 553.4
- Intestinal sepsis — n=35, PRR 290.5
- Facet joint syndrome — n=378, PRR 246.7
- Onychomadesis — n=445, PRR 217.2
- Rheumatic fever — n=398, PRR 181.4
- Peripheral venous disease — n=341, PRR 169.0
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Minocycline ↔ Skin hyperpigmentation.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Minocycline?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Minocycline are nausea, pain, arthralgia, fatigue, rash, drug hypersensitivity. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Minocycline have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Minocycline has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Minocycline causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID cbffa96e-2446-43cf-ba5e-38c645302afd, effective 20240209; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"MINOCYCLINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,101 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
MINOCYCLINE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.