← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Niacin side effects: what 11,543 FDA adverse event reports show

Niacin · 1,098 reaction terms · 46,030 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nicotinic Acid

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class)

Who reports

11,543 reports · 56% serious · 757 with death outcome · 43% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Therapy with lipid-altering agents should be only one component of multiple risk factor intervention in individuals at significantly increased risk for atherosclerotic vascular disease due to hyperlipidemia. Niacin therapy is indicated as an adjunct to diet when the response to a diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol and other nonpharmacologic measures alone has been inadequate. 1.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Niacin extended-release tablet, USP contains niacin, which at therapeutic doses is an antihyperlipidemic agent. Niacin (nicotinic acid, or 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid) is a white, crystalline po.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 7Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 25
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,058 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Urticaria thermal20293.6
183.0–470.9ROR 294.1 · χ² 4,762 / p <1e-300
203.5 EB05 139.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Administration site erythema1495.3
55.7–163.1ROR 95.4 · χ² 1,153 / p 6e-253
80.9 EB05 51.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Discoloured vomit2345.2
29.9–68.4ROR 45.3 · χ² 927 / p 6e-204
42.7 EB05 30.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder1627.4
16.7–44.9ROR 27.4 · χ² 375 / p 7e-84
26.2 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Venous insufficiency1025.2
13.5–46.9ROR 25.2 · χ² 205 / p 7e-47
23.6 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Nephrogenic anaemia5120.0
15.2–26.4ROR 20.1 · χ² 893 / p 2e-196
19.7 EB05 15.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=51no trial data cached
High density lipoprotein decreased3619.8
14.2–27.5ROR 19.8 · χ² 616 / p 2e-136
19.4 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=18 · ♀ 12% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Hyperparathyroidism secondary2215.9
10.5–24.2ROR 15.9 · χ² 290 / p 2e-65
15.3 EB05 10.4 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22no trial data cached
Rebound acid hypersecretion2414.3
9.6–21.4ROR 14.3 · χ² 282 / p 2e-63
13.7 EB05 9.4 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24no trial data cached
Haemorrhagic anaemia3112.7
8.9–18.1ROR 12.7 · χ² 320 / p 6e-72
12.2 EB05 8.7 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=31 · 79% consumerno trial data cached
Excoriation1712.1
7.5–19.4ROR 12.1 · χ² 160 / p 4e-37
10.9 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Colonic polyp1112.0
6.6–21.7ROR 12.0 · χ² 99 / p 1e-23
10.1 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Vitamin b12 deficiency2511.4
7.7–16.8ROR 11.4 · χ² 225 / p 5e-51
10.6 EB05 7.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Essential hypertension1611.3
6.9–18.4ROR 11.3 · χ² 139 / p 2e-32
10.0 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=15no trial data cached
Muscle cramp1111.2
6.2–20.2ROR 11.2 · χ² 91 / p 6e-22
9.2 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=9no trial data cached
Lipids increased1210.9
6.2–19.3ROR 10.9 · χ² 98 / p 2e-23
9.1 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Pericardial haemorrhage1210.0
5.7–17.6ROR 10.0 · χ² 88 / p 4e-21
8.2 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12no trial data cached
Blood cholesterol decreased109.8
5.3–18.2ROR 9.8 · χ² 70 / p 3e-17
7.7 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
–no trial data cached
Orthopnoea169.1
5.6–14.9ROR 9.2 · χ² 107 / p 2e-25
7.8 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16no trial data cached
Benign prostatic hyperplasia258.8
5.9–13.0ROR 8.8 · χ² 164 / p 6e-38
7.9 EB05 5.5 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 0% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Low density lipoprotein increased337.8
5.6–11.0ROR 7.8 · χ² 189 / p 3e-43
7.2 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=19no trial data cached
Urinary tract obstruction107.7
4.2–14.4ROR 7.7 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13
6.0 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached
Coronary artery disease1297.7
6.5–9.1ROR 7.8 · χ² 744 / p 5e-164
7.5 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
serious PRR 7.7no trial data cached
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic127.7
4.3–13.5ROR 7.7 · χ² 63 / p 1e-15
6.2 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=12no trial data cached
Tricuspid valve incompetence317.1
5.0–10.2ROR 7.2 · χ² 157 / p 2e-36
6.5 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.3no trial data cached
Blood cholesterol abnormal187.1
4.5–11.3ROR 7.1 · χ² 88 / p 3e-21
6.1 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=14no trial data cached
Carotid artery occlusion147.0
4.1–11.8ROR 7.0 · χ² 65 / p 3e-16
5.8 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=14no trial data cached
Radiculopathy106.9
3.7–12.8ROR 6.9 · χ² 45 / p 1e-11
5.4 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=8no trial data cached
Blood testosterone decreased266.9
4.7–10.1ROR 6.9 · χ² 124 / p 5e-29
6.2 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=11 · ♀ 0% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Pigmentation disorder236.8
4.5–10.2ROR 6.8 · χ² 108 / p 2e-25
6.1 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · ♀ 100% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Carotid artery stenosis136.7
3.9–11.6ROR 6.8 · χ² 58 / p 1e-14
5.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=13no trial data cached
Hyperlipidaemia446.7
5.0–9.0ROR 6.7 · χ² 206 / p 4e-47
6.3 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 6.5no trial data cached
Internal haemorrhage416.5
4.8–8.9ROR 6.5 · χ² 186 / p 1e-42
6.1 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 6.8 · ♀ 66% (drug 43%)no trial data cached
Coronary artery occlusion496.5
4.9–8.6ROR 6.5 · χ² 221 / p 3e-50
6.1 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 6.6no trial data cached
Muscle fatigue156.5
3.9–10.7ROR 6.5 · χ² 64 / p 7e-16
5.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=10no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)7471.0
1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · χ² 1 / p 0.206
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Nausea6781.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 141 / p 7e-33
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.5Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6431.8
1.7–2.0ROR 1.9 · χ² 242 / p 7e-55
1.8 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Dizziness5522.0
1.9–2.2ROR 2.1 · χ² 287 / p 9e-65
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)5331.7
1.6–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 161 / p 3e-37
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Pain4941.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 73 / p 7e-18
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Headache4771.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 52 / p 3e-13
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.6no trial data cached
Asthenia (weakness)4462.2
2.0–2.4ROR 2.2 · χ² 280 / p 5e-63
2.2 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +0.9Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.2no trial data cached
Fall3862.1
1.9–2.3ROR 2.1 · χ² 227 / p 1e-51
2.1 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Arthralgia (joint pain)3811.7
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 104 / p 1e-24
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.7no trial data cached
Pain in extremity3782.3
2.1–2.6ROR 2.4 · χ² 288 / p 6e-65
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Rash3521.5
1.3–1.6ROR 1.5 · χ² 54 / p 8e-14
1.5 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.4no trial data cached
Pruritus (itching)3491.7
1.5–1.9ROR 1.7 · χ² 96 / p 5e-23
1.7 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.8no trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Niacin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Niacin are fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, dizziness, dyspnoea, drug hypersensitivity. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Niacin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Niacin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Niacin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.