Diphenhydramine side effects: what 62,798 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Brand names
Nightime Sleep Aid
Who reports
62,798 reports · 76% serious · 11,756 with death outcome · 64% female
Used for
For relief of occasional sleeplessness.
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Reporting / coding artifact An administrative, monitoring or exposure term (product issue, off-label use, 'test normal', overdose...). Not a biological reaction; a high PRR here reflects how reports are coded.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
- No label text to screen No validated FDA label was retrievable for this product, so the screen could not run. Disproportionality only.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,173 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaginal flatulence | 146 | 307.4 245.3–385.1ROR 308.1 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓ | 156.0 EB05 135.9 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=146 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Grip strength | 77 | 166.4 126.5–218.8ROR 166.6 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 107.9 EB05 89.1 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=77 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Central nervous system lupus | 55 | 113.6 83.6–154.3ROR 113.7 · calibrated p 8e-8 ✓ | 82.3 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Administration site swelling | 61 | 77.3 58.5–102.2ROR 77.4 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 61.6 EB05 49.7 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure diastolic abnormal | 457 | 72.2 65.2–79.8ROR 72.7 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 59.2 EB05 54.8 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=446 · 90% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Temperature regulation disorder | 354 | 64.5 57.6–72.2ROR 64.8 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 53.9 EB05 49.4 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=354 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site mass | 158 | 57.9 48.9–68.6ROR 58.1 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓ | 49.1 EB05 43.0 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=118 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure systolic abnormal | 359 | 56.2 50.2–62.8ROR 56.5 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓ | 48.0 EB05 44.0 · IC025 +5.3 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=350 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Postmortem blood drug level increased | 52 | 55.8 41.6–74.9ROR 55.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 47.1 EB05 37.3 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=52 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site discharge | 245 | 55.8 48.7–63.8ROR 56.0 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓ | 47.6 EB05 42.8 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=222 · 83% consumer | no trial arm names this drug |
| Epidural lipomatosis | 49 | 54.5 40.3–73.8ROR 54.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 46.1 EB05 36.3 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=49 · ♀ 0% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site urticaria | 89 | 52.1 41.7–65.1ROR 52.2 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 44.7 EB05 37.4 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=55 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site bruising | 278 | 50.1 44.2–56.9ROR 50.4 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓ | 43.5 EB05 39.4 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=210 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site pruritus | 378 | 46.0 41.3–51.2ROR 46.3 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓ | 40.4 EB05 37.1 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=242 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pharyngeal paraesthesia | 169 | 40.5 34.5–47.5ROR 40.6 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓ | 36.0 EB05 31.7 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=167 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Neurologic neglect syndrome | 56 | 37.0 28.1–48.8ROR 37.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 33.0 EB05 26.4 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=56 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site rash | 135 | 36.6 30.7–43.8ROR 36.7 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.9 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=86 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Female genital tract fistula | 169 | 36.3 31.0–42.5ROR 36.4 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.7 EB05 28.7 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=169 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site haemorrhage | 311 | 35.4 31.5–39.7ROR 35.5 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 32.0 EB05 29.1 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=236 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site discomfort | 97 | 34.9 28.3–43.1ROR 35.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 31.5 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=72 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site swelling | 570 | 34.0 31.2–37.0ROR 34.3 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 30.9 EB05 28.8 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=359 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Lupus vulgaris | 110 | 33.9 27.9–41.3ROR 34.0 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 30.7 EB05 26.2 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=110 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Ear pruritus | 318 | 33.5 29.9–37.6ROR 33.7 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓ | 30.4 EB05 27.7 · IC025 +4.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=304 · ♀ 85% (drug 64%) · 92% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site nodule | 75 | 30.3 23.9–38.3ROR 30.3 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 27.6 EB05 22.8 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | – | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site extravasation | 517 | 30.2 27.6–33.0ROR 30.4 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 27.7 EB05 25.8 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=330 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Anticholinergic syndrome | 128 | 29.1 24.3–34.8ROR 29.1 · calibrated p 3e-4 ✓ | 26.7 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=127 · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Porphyria acute | 102 | 26.6 21.7–32.5ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 24.6 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=102 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure fluctuation | 1,676 | 24.9 23.7–26.2ROR 25.6 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓ | 23.2 EB05 22.3 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 21.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Chronic sinusitis | 258 | 24.6 21.7–27.9ROR 24.7 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 22.9 EB05 20.7 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=242 · ♀ 94% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Poor venous access | 709 | 24.6 22.8–26.5ROR 24.8 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 22.9 EB05 21.5 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=630 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Food allergy | 518 | 24.5 22.4–26.8ROR 24.7 · calibrated p 7e-4 ✓ | 22.9 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=507 · ♀ 97% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site erythema | 554 | 23.9 21.9–26.0ROR 24.1 · calibrated p 8e-4 ✓ | 22.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=347 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Carotid artery thrombosis | 57 | 23.8 18.2–31.2ROR 23.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 22.1 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=57 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site pain | 817 | 22.8 21.2–24.4ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.3 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 17.0 · serious n=530 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Deep vein thrombosis postoperative | 125 | 22.7 18.9–27.2ROR 22.7 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.2 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=125 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Blood pressure diastolic decreased | 469 | 22.5 20.5–24.7ROR 22.6 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 21.1 EB05 19.5 · IC025 +4.2 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 16.6 · 91% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site discolouration | 54 | 22.3 16.9–29.3ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.8 EB05 16.5 · IC025 +3.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Radiculopathy | 165 | 22.2 19.0–26.0ROR 22.3 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.8 EB05 18.3 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=165 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion site irritation | 77 | 22.0 17.5–27.7ROR 22.0 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.6 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=47 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Incorrect drug administration rate | 259 | 21.7 19.2–24.6ROR 21.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓ | 20.4 EB05 18.4 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | serious n=214 | no trial arm names this drug |
Clinical concept groups
MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.
| Concept | Reports | PRR 95% CI | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suicidality | 3,297 | 4.54.4–4.7 | signal |
| Serious infection | 7,135 | 3.13.0–3.2 | signal |
| Opportunistic infection | 1,223 | 3.02.9–3.2 | signal |
| Neutropenia / agranulocytosis | 2,077 | 2.82.7–2.9 | signal |
| Anaphylaxis / angioedema | 1,025 | 2.72.6–2.9 | signal |
| Anaemia | 1,816 | 2.01.9–2.1 | raised |
| Fall / fracture | 2,170 | 1.91.8–2.0 | raised |
| Thrombocytopenia | 1,210 | 1.81.7–1.9 | raised |
| Arrhythmia / qt | 1,049 | 1.81.7–1.9 | raised |
| Liver injury | 1,621 | 1.81.7–1.9 | raised |
| Interstitial lung disease | 514 | 1.81.6–2.0 | raised |
| Seizure | 1,023 | 1.71.6–1.9 | raised |
| Pancreatitis | 350 | 1.51.3–1.6 | raised |
| Hyponatraemia | 334 | 1.41.2–1.5 | raised |
| Gi bleeding | 710 | 1.31.2–1.4 | raised |
| Venous thromboembolism | 835 | 1.31.2–1.4 | raised |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 8,239 | 3.2 3.1–3.3ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.479 | 3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 4.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Headache | 5,326 | 2.9 2.8–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.617 | 2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.3 · serious PRR 3.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 5,270 | 2.3 2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.861 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Nausea | 4,673 | 2.0 1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.978 | 2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9 | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pain | 4,152 | 2.3 2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.879 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.3 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 4,010 | 1.0 1.0–1.0ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.318 | 1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.0 PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 1.2 · serious PRR 2.0 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Toxicity to various agents | 3,778 | 7.7 7.4–7.9ROR 8.1 · calibrated p 0.064 | 7.5 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.9 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 6.9 · serious PRR 5.8 · 95% clinician | no trial arm names this drug |
| Sinusitis | 3,733 | 12.5 12.2–13.0ROR 13.3 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓ | 12.1 EB05 11.8 · IC025 +3.5 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 8.6 · serious PRR 10.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pyrexia (fever) | 3,540 | 3.4 3.3–3.6ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.464 | 3.4 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 2.8 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 3,522 | 2.1 2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.977 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 1.9 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion) | 3,473 | 18.5 17.9–19.1ROR 19.5 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 17.5 EB05 17.1 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 15.6 · serious PRR 13.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 3,230 | 3.4 3.2–3.5ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.488 | 3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 3.1 · serious PRR 2.6 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Inappropriate schedule of product administration | 3,134 | 6.0 5.8–6.2ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.134 | 5.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 5.3 · serious PRR 10.4 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 3,082 | 2.5 2.4–2.6ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.783 | 2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 3.1 | no trial arm names this drug |
| Pruritus (itching) | 2,969 | 2.6 2.5–2.7ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.726 | 2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 2.5 · serious PRR 3.7 | no trial arm names this drug |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Diphenhydramine?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diphenhydramine are headache, fatigue, nausea, pain, toxicity to various agents, sinusitis. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Diphenhydramine have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Diphenhydramine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Diphenhydramine causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 9c44e54f-d8bc-4451-8382-40d2e8e03b42, effective 20180521; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"DIPHENHYDRAMINE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,213 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
DIPHENHYDRAMINE, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.