← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Hydrocortisone side effects: what 88,710 FDA adverse event reports show

Hydrocortisone · 1,212 reaction terms · 668,577 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Corticosteroid

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

88,710 reports · 82% serious · 11,614 with death outcome · 61% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Hydrocortisone tablets are indicated in the following conditions. 1. Endocrine Disorders Primary or secondary adrenocortical insufficiency (hydrocortisone or cortisone is the first choice; synthetic analogs may be used in conjunction with mineralocorti.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Cortisol is a 17alpha-hydroxy-C21-steroid that is pregn-4-ene substituted by oxo groups at positions 3 and 20 and hydroxy groups at positions 11, 17 and 21.

PubChem CID 5754 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 5Likely indication confounding 5Lab value / disease marker 8Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,172 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence191399.5
316.2–504.8ROR 400.4 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
145.4 EB05 128.9 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.0 (6.9–9.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=191 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%)not reported in cached trials
Human bocavirus infection114357.7
267.0–479.2ROR 358.2 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
138.2 EB05 118.2 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.1 (6.7–9.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=114not reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative947222.3
203.4–243.0ROR 224.7 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
113.8 EB05 107.9 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.7 (5.4–6.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=947 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody314211.3
181.4–246.2ROR 212.1 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
110.4 EB05 100.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.6 (5.0–6.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=314 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris553206.4
184.1–231.4ROR 207.7 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
109.3 EB05 101.9 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.8 (5.3–6.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=553 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein416201.2
176.5–229.4ROR 202.2 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
107.7 EB05 99.3 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.0–6.0)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=416 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased1,385189.8
176.9–203.7ROR 192.8 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
104.7 EB05 100.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.8 (5.5–6.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,385 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever1,890181.2
170.7–192.3ROR 185.1 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
102.1 EB05 98.3 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.6 (5.4–5.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=1,890 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength97170.6
131.3–221.7ROR 170.8 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
96.9 EB05 81.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.4 (6.0–9.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,230151.7
141.3–163.0ROR 153.9 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
92.0 EB05 87.8 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.2–5.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,230 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood757142.6
130.2–156.0ROR 143.8 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
88.5 EB05 83.3 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.0 (5.6–6.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=757 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired187123.7
103.6–147.7ROR 124.0 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
80.4 EB05 71.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.6 (6.5–8.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=186 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive2,421122.4
116.5–128.5ROR 125.8 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
80.4 EB05 77.8 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.3–5.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 56.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count83120.4
92.4–157.0ROR 120.6 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
78.3 EB05 65.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.8 (5.5–8.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=83 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra728115.1
105.4–125.8ROR 116.1 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓
77.2 EB05 72.6 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.7 (5.3–6.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=728 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive1,822109.2
103.4–115.4ROR 111.5 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
74.5 EB05 71.7 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.3–5.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,822 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal563109.0
98.7–120.5ROR 109.7 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
74.3 EB05 69.3 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.0–5.9)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=563 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Cystitis bacterial9794.2
74.4–119.3ROR 94.3 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
66.5 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.6 (7.0–10.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=97not reported in cached trials
Norovirus test positive9090.9
71.2–115.9ROR 90.9 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
64.7 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.7 (7.0–10.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=90 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Craniopharyngioma9390.0
70.8–114.3ROR 90.1 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
64.3 EB05 54.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 10.7 (8.6–13.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=91 · ♀ 0% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Steroid dependence21982.0
70.3–95.7ROR 82.2 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
60.6 EB05 54.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.2 (5.4–7.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=216 · ♀ 27% (drug 61%)not reported in cached trials
Adrenocortical insufficiency acute49281.5
73.6–90.3ROR 82.0 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
60.5 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 10.0 (9.1–11.0)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=487not reported in cached trials
Retinitis42781.2
72.7–90.6ROR 81.6 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
60.3 EB05 55.6 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.0 (4.6–5.6)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=427 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Appendicolith9679.9
63.4–100.7ROR 80.0 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
59.0 EB05 49.8 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 10.6 (8.6–13.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=96 · ♀ 0% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection2,45474.9
71.6–78.3ROR 77.0 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
56.8 EB05 55.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.3–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 42.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease89568.2
63.3–73.5ROR 68.9 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
52.9 EB05 50.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.1 (4.8–5.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=892 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus2,77067.7
64.9–70.6ROR 69.8 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
52.6 EB05 51.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.8 (4.6–5.0)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 37.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury1,78165.4
62.1–68.9ROR 66.8 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
51.2 EB05 49.3 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.3–5.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 38.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Mycobacterium chelonae infection15462.4
52.2–74.5ROR 62.5 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
49.1 EB05 42.9 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.1 (4.3–6.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=154not reported in cached trials
Hand deformity2,70961.6
59.1–64.3ROR 63.6 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
48.9 EB05 47.4 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.0 (4.9–5.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 37.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal1,31360.8
57.3–64.6ROR 61.7 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
48.4 EB05 46.2 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.2 (4.9–5.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,313 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type1,30560.0
56.5–63.7ROR 60.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
47.9 EB05 45.7 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.6 (5.3–5.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,297 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Folliculitis2,09259.9
57.2–62.9ROR 61.4 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
47.8 EB05 46.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.5 (5.2–5.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 39.3 · ♀ 98% (drug 61%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Catarrh16955.3
46.8–65.4ROR 55.4 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
44.7 EB05 39.3 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.5 (6.4–8.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=169 · ♀ 0% (drug 61%)not reported in cached trials
Seronegative arthritis19449.3
42.2–57.5ROR 49.4 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
40.7 EB05 36.1 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.8 (5.9–7.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=194 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Liver injury5,2964.24.1–4.3signal
Interstitial lung disease1,6104.03.8–4.2signal
Hyponatraemia1,1293.33.2–3.5signal
Serious infection10,0343.13.0–3.2signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes4,3243.02.9–3.1signal
Opportunistic infection1,5222.72.5–2.8signal
Pancreatitis8792.62.4–2.8signal
Tendon disorder4122.62.3–2.8signal
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis2,6742.62.5–2.7signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema1,2902.42.3–2.6signal
Depression2,8552.42.3–2.5signal
Gi bleeding1,7542.32.2–2.4signal
Severe cutaneous reaction6912.22.0–2.4signal
Anaemia2,7162.22.1–2.2signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy6712.01.8–2.1raised
Venous thromboembolism1,7381.91.8–2.0raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Hydrocortisone as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)11,9393.3
3.2–3.3ROR 3.6 · calibrated p 0.452
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.5 (3.5–3.6)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.7 · serious PRR 3.9not reported in cached trials
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)10,8222.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.988
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.6)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 3.2not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)9,2802.8
2.8–2.9ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.607
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.5 (4.4–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Pain7,3972.9
2.8–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.616
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.5 (4.5–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 2.9NCT00691002: 1/362 (0.3%) on Hydrocortisone (serious AE)
Nausea7,0582.1
2.1–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.941
2.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.3 (4.2–4.4)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 2.5NCT00691002: 1/453 (0.2%) on Hydrocortisone (serious AE)
Condition aggravated6,9875.6
5.4–5.7ROR 6.0 · calibrated p 0.152
5.5 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.4 (4.3–4.5)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.2 · serious PRR 5.6not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)6,9804.0
3.9–4.1ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.328
4.0 EB05 3.9 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.8 (4.7–4.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.4 · serious PRR 4.6NCT00691002: 12/453 (2.6%) on Hydrocortisone
Headache6,5162.5
2.4–2.5ROR 2.6 · calibrated p 0.775
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.5 (4.4–4.6)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 3.1NCT00691002: 8/362 (2.2%) on Hydrocortisone
Rash6,4813.6
3.5–3.7ROR 3.8 · calibrated p 0.422
3.5 EB05 3.5 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.4 (4.3–4.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.2 · serious PRR 4.6not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)6,3902.4
2.3–2.4ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.827
2.3 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.9 (3.8–4.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.6NCT00691002: 4/351 (1.1%) on Hydrocortisone
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)6,1722.6
2.5–2.7ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.726
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.4not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)5,5053.8
3.7–3.9ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.380
3.8 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.7 (3.6–3.8)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 3.2NCT00691002: 3/362 (0.8%) on Hydrocortisone
Vomiting5,3072.7
2.6–2.8ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.694
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.3 (4.2–4.4)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.6not reported in cached trials
Malaise (feeling unwell)5,0922.8
2.7–2.8ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.672
2.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.5 (4.4–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.7 · serious PRR 3.0not reported in cached trials
Pruritus (itching)5,0813.2
3.1–3.3ROR 3.3 · calibrated p 0.525
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.1 (5.0–5.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.7 · serious PRR 4.3NCT00691002: 2/351 (0.6%) on Hydrocortisone

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Hydrocortisone?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Hydrocortisone are fatigue, pain, nausea, arthralgia, headache, rash. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Hydrocortisone have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Hydrocortisone has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Hydrocortisone causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.