← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Icosapent Ethyl side effects: what 8,453 FDA adverse event reports show

Icosapent Ethyl · 1,008 reaction terms · 37,179 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

8,453 reports · 39% serious · 542 with death outcome · 47% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Icosapent ethyl capsules are indicated: • as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels in adult patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia. Limitations of Use: The effect of icosapent ethyl capsules on the risk for pancreatitis in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia has not been determined.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Icosapent ethyl, a lipid-regulating agent, is supplied as a 1 gram oblong, pale yellow or yellow transparent soft gelatin capsule for oral use. Each icosapent ethyl capsule contains 1 gram of icosapent ethyl. Icosapent ethyl is an ethyl ester of the omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA).

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Reporting / coding artifact 9Lab value / disease marker 8Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 968 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Overlap syndrome74297.9
234.3–378.9ROR 300.5 · χ² 19,256 / p <1e-300
248.6 EB05 204.6 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=74 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Product odour abnormal1,031273.4
257.3–290.5ROR 311.2 · χ² 251,557 / p <1e-300
244.9 EB05 232.6 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=91 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Poor quality product administered633163.6
151.4–176.8ROR 176.7 · χ² 95,767 / p <1e-300
152.7 EB05 143.0 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Blood immunoglobulin m increased32136.7
95.8–195.1ROR 137.2 · χ² 3,955 / p <1e-300
120.4 EB05 89.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Blood immunoglobulin a decreased32128.0
89.8–182.5ROR 128.5 · χ² 3,712 / p <1e-300
113.6 EB05 84.2 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Product coating issue49125.3
94.1–166.8ROR 126.0 · χ² 5,628 / p <1e-300
114.0 EB05 89.6 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=3 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Product physical issue873113.5
106.4–121.1ROR 126.4 · χ² 93,006 / p <1e-300
108.3 EB05 102.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=84 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Milk-alkali syndrome23112.9
74.3–171.3ROR 113.2 · χ² 2,332 / p <1e-300
99.3 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Product colour issue220112.5
98.4–128.5ROR 115.4 · χ² 23,131 / p <1e-300
106.6 EB05 95.3 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=25 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
C-reactive protein37105.3
75.8–146.2ROR 105.7 · χ² 3,564 / p <1e-300
96.1 EB05 72.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=37 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Hypocholesterolaemia1191.7
50.3–167.4ROR 91.9 · χ² 866 / p 1e-190
77.1 EB05 45.9 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Product after taste3287.6
61.6–124.5ROR 87.9 · χ² 2,561 / p <1e-300
80.6 EB05 59.8 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumerno trial data cached
Product taste abnormal44584.8
77.3–93.0ROR 89.4 · χ² 35,547 / p <1e-300
81.7 EB05 75.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=33 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Blood triglycerides abnormal2984.7
58.5–122.5ROR 85.0 · χ² 2,237 / p <1e-300
77.8 EB05 56.8 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=4no trial data cached
Blood immunoglobulin g increased3266.7
47.0–94.7ROR 66.9 · χ² 1,952 / p <1e-300
62.6 EB05 46.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Rheumatic disorder4254.7
40.3–74.2ROR 55.0 · χ² 2,114 / p <1e-300
52.3 EB05 40.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Intentional underdose15654.2
46.3–63.4ROR 55.2 · χ² 7,918 / p <1e-300
52.7 EB05 46.1 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · 91% consumerno trial data cached
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody1349.2
28.4–85.1ROR 49.3 · χ² 555 / p 5e-123
45.3 EB05 28.1 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=13no trial data cached
Lupus vulgaris2348.8
32.3–73.7ROR 48.9 · χ² 1,009 / p 9e-222
46.1 EB05 32.4 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23no trial data cached
Product size issue9746.0
37.7–56.2ROR 46.6 · χ² 4,151 / p <1e-300
44.8 EB05 37.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=16 · 90% consumerno trial data cached
Product leakage9645.4
37.1–55.5ROR 45.9 · χ² 4,050 / p <1e-300
44.2 EB05 37.3 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=11 · 85% consumerno trial data cached
Facet joint syndrome5443.2
33.0–56.4ROR 43.4 · χ² 2,144 / p <1e-300
41.8 EB05 33.3 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 94% clinicianno trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased30142.8
38.3–47.8ROR 44.3 · χ² 12,040 / p <1e-300
42.0 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.8no trial data cached
Prescribed underdose30939.0
34.9–43.5ROR 40.4 · χ² 11,226 / p <1e-300
38.3 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.5no trial data cached
Eructation (belching)27936.9
32.8–41.4ROR 38.1 · χ² 9,566 / p <1e-300
36.3 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · 87% consumerno trial data cached
Retinitis2334.6
22.9–52.2ROR 34.7 · χ² 707 / p 4e-156
33.3 EB05 23.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 100% clinicianno trial data cached
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative2633.3
22.6–49.0ROR 33.4 · χ² 771 / p 5e-170
32.1 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Porphyria acute1832.7
20.6–52.0ROR 32.8 · χ² 515 / p 2e-114
31.3 EB05 21.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached
X-ray abnormal2028.1
18.1–43.6ROR 28.1 · χ² 490 / p 9e-109
27.1 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=20no trial data cached
Hepatic necrosis3925.8
18.8–35.3ROR 25.9 · χ² 896 / p 5e-197
25.3 EB05 19.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=39 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Seronegative arthritis1124.5
13.5–44.4ROR 24.5 · χ² 223 / p 1e-50
23.2 EB05 13.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11no trial data cached
Muscle injury7924.1
19.3–30.0ROR 24.3 · χ² 1,707 / p <1e-300
23.7 EB05 19.6 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 37.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
Colitis microscopic4423.4
17.4–31.5ROR 23.6 · χ² 914 / p 4e-201
23.0 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=43 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Helicobacter infection9523.3
19.1–28.5ROR 23.5 · χ² 1,987 / p <1e-300
23.0 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 96% clinicianno trial data cached
C-reactive protein abnormal5822.6
17.5–29.3ROR 22.8 · χ² 1,167 / p 6e-256
22.3 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=58 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Product residue present4722.1
16.6–29.5ROR 22.3 · χ² 920 / p 2e-202
21.8 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=6no trial data cached
Duodenal ulcer perforation6522.1
17.3–28.2ROR 22.3 · χ² 1,279 / p 3e-280
21.8 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 32.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 47%) · 95% clinicianno trial data cached
Drug tolerance decreased2421.4
14.3–32.0ROR 21.5 · χ² 443 / p 1e-98
20.9 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 92% clinicianno trial data cached
Dislocation of vertebra1921.3
13.6–33.5ROR 21.4 · χ² 345 / p 2e-77
20.7 EB05 13.9 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=19no trial data cached
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood1721.1
13.1–33.9ROR 21.1 · χ² 302 / p 5e-68
20.4 EB05 13.3 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17no trial data cached

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Trial cross-check not yet run for this drug (ClinicalTrials.gov pull covers the 800 most-reported drugs first).

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Product odour abnormal1,031273.4
257.3–290.5ROR 311.2 · χ² 251,557 / p <1e-300
244.9 EB05 232.6 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=91 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Product physical issue873113.5
106.4–121.1ROR 126.4 · χ² 93,006 / p <1e-300
108.3 EB05 102.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=84 · 86% consumerno trial data cached
Off label use (used outside approved label)7812.2
2.1–2.4ROR 2.4 · χ² 551 / p 3e-122
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.6no trial data cached
Poor quality product administered633163.6
151.4–176.8ROR 176.7 · χ² 95,767 / p <1e-300
152.7 EB05 143.0 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48 · 88% consumerno trial data cached
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)5972.3
2.1–2.5ROR 2.4 · χ² 451 / p 2e-100
2.3 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.4no trial data cached
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)5631.1
1.0–1.1ROR 1.1 · χ² 2 / p 0.082
1.1 EB05 1.0 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Nausea5331.7
1.5–1.8ROR 1.7 · χ² 150 / p 1e-34
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8no trial data cached
Arthralgia (joint pain)4922.9
2.7–3.2ROR 3.1 · χ² 642 / p 8e-142
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.0no trial data cached
Product taste abnormal44584.8
77.3–93.0ROR 89.4 · χ² 35,547 / p <1e-300
81.7 EB05 75.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=33 · 89% consumerno trial data cached
Fatigue (tiredness)4341.4
1.3–1.5ROR 1.4 · χ² 48 / p 3e-12
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3no trial data cached
Prescribed underdose30939.0
34.9–43.5ROR 40.4 · χ² 11,226 / p <1e-300
38.3 EB05 34.8 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 31.5no trial data cached
Blood triglycerides increased30142.8
38.3–47.8ROR 44.3 · χ² 12,040 / p <1e-300
42.0 EB05 38.1 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 17.8no trial data cached
Headache3001.2
1.1–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 9 / p 0.001
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.9 · ♀ 68% (drug 47%)no trial data cached
Dizziness3001.5
1.3–1.7ROR 1.5 · χ² 50 / p 1e-12
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.1no trial data cached
Eructation (belching)27936.9
32.8–41.4ROR 38.1 · χ² 9,566 / p <1e-300
36.3 EB05 32.8 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=11 · 87% consumerno trial data cached

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Icosapent Ethyl?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Icosapent Ethyl are poor quality product administered, diarrhoea, nausea, arthralgia, fatigue, prescribed underdose. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Icosapent Ethyl have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Icosapent Ethyl has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Icosapent Ethyl causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.