Tramadol side effects: what 37,420 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Label matched
Tramadol Hydrochloride (Tramadol Hydrochloride)
Who reports
37,420 reports · 90% serious · 7,344 with death outcome · 61% female
Used for
Tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets are indicated for the management of severe and persistent pain that requires an opioid analgesic and that cannot be adequately treated with alternative options, including immediate-release opioids. Limita.
What it is
Tramadol hydrochloride is an opioid agonist in an extended-release tablet formulation for oral use.
Boxed warning
SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS Addiction, Abuse, and Misuse Because the use of tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets exposes patients and othe.
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Labeled adverse reaction The exact term appears in the label's warnings or adverse-reactions sections: a known, expected effect. The FAERS signal confirms the label rather than discovering anything.
- Labeled (related wording) The label describes this effect under different wording (e.g. 'neutropenia' for 'neutrophil count decreased'). Treated as known.
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,161 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatic enzyme | 78 | 717.5 512.5–1,004.5ROR 719.0 · calibrated p 6e-15 ✓ | 290.3 EB05 240.1 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=78 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| C-reactive protein | 319 | 305.1 266.2–349.7ROR 307.8 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓ | 194.6 EB05 177.3 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=319 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 98% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypocholesterolaemia | 97 | 258.6 203.3–329.1ROR 259.3 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓ | 170.6 EB05 143.9 · IC025 +6.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=97 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Facet joint syndrome | 868 | 213.5 197.5–230.7ROR 218.5 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓ | 153.7 EB05 145.3 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=868 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody | 173 | 196.5 165.2–233.6ROR 197.4 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓ | 142.9 EB05 125.9 · IC025 +6.4 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=173 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatic fever | 1,035 | 174.3 162.7–186.8ROR 179.3 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 132.4 EB05 125.8 · IC025 +6.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=1,035 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Lupus vulgaris | 276 | 169.5 148.1–193.8ROR 170.7 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓ | 128.7 EB05 116.5 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=276 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Ejection fraction | 127 | 155.8 128.0–189.6ROR 156.3 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 119.6 EB05 103.1 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=127 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Deep vein thrombosis postoperative | 414 | 150.1 134.7–167.3ROR 151.8 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓ | 117.6 EB05 108.4 · IC025 +6.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=414 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Analgesic drug level above therapeutic | 31 | 150.1 100.9–223.2ROR 150.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 110.3 EB05 81.4 · IC025 +4.8 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=31 · ♀ 0% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Swollen joint count increased | 654 | 148.9 136.6–162.2ROR 151.5 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓ | 117.1 EB05 109.7 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=654 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Swollen joint count | 49 | 139.4 101.9–190.7ROR 139.6 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓ | 106.9 EB05 84.1 · IC025 +5.2 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=49 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Sensitisation | 150 | 136.6 114.3–163.3ROR 137.2 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 108.2 EB05 94.5 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=150 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Amaurosis fugax | 192 | 122.7 104.9–143.4ROR 123.3 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓ | 99.6 EB05 88.3 · IC025 +6.1 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=192 · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Peripheral venous disease | 669 | 112.8 103.9–122.5ROR 114.9 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 93.6 EB05 87.8 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=669 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Duodenal ulcer perforation | 1,111 | 100.0 93.8–106.5ROR 103.0 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓ | 84.7 EB05 80.6 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 54.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Retinitis | 242 | 95.0 82.9–108.8ROR 95.6 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 80.7 EB05 72.5 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=242 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Dislocation of vertebra | 320 | 94.1 83.7–106.0ROR 95.0 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 80.2 EB05 73.1 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=320 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Adjustment disorder with depressed mood | 288 | 93.4 82.5–105.8ROR 94.1 · calibrated p 2e-7 ✓ | 79.6 EB05 72.2 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=288 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Dependence | 7,827 | 91.9 89.9–93.9ROR 116.0 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 78.9 EB05 77.5 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 50.7 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Seronegative arthritis | 149 | 85.8 72.2–101.9ROR 86.1 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 73.7 EB05 64.3 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=149 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive | 924 | 83.7 78.2–89.7ROR 85.8 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓ | 72.7 EB05 68.9 · IC025 +6.0 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 46.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Grip strength | 30 | 83.2 56.7–122.1ROR 83.3 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 69.4 EB05 50.9 · IC025 +4.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=30 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Learning disorder | 308 | 81.0 71.9–91.2ROR 81.7 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓ | 70.5 EB05 64.1 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=308 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired | 67 | 78.5 60.8–101.4ROR 78.7 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 67.6 EB05 55.1 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| C-reactive protein abnormal | 786 | 78.3 72.7–84.4ROR 80.0 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓ | 68.6 EB05 64.7 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=786 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatoid factor positive | 697 | 77.0 71.2–83.3ROR 78.4 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓ | 67.6 EB05 63.4 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=697 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 98% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Onychomadesis | 492 | 75.2 68.5–82.6ROR 76.2 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓ | 66.2 EB05 61.4 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=492 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Folliculitis | 1,223 | 75.2 70.9–79.8ROR 77.7 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓ | 66.3 EB05 63.2 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 49.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Breast cancer stage iii | 757 | 74.7 69.3–80.5ROR 76.2 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓ | 65.8 EB05 62.0 · IC025 +5.9 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=757 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Nasal oedema | 208 | 73.5 63.6–84.9ROR 73.9 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 64.6 EB05 57.6 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | serious n=207 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Lip dry | 986 | 69.3 64.9–73.9ROR 71.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 61.6 EB05 58.4 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=986 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Antidepressant drug level above therapeutic | 28 | 68.1 46.0–100.8ROR 68.1 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 58.4 EB05 42.4 · IC025 +4.3 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=28 · ♀ 0% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Muscle injury | 884 | 67.6 63.1–72.4ROR 69.2 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 60.3 EB05 57.0 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 41.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Helicobacter infection | 1,089 | 67.0 63.0–71.3ROR 69.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 59.8 EB05 56.9 · IC025 +5.8 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious PRR 40.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| X-ray abnormal | 190 | 66.7 57.4–77.5ROR 67.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓ | 59.3 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=190 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Neutropenia neonatal | 23 | 63.5 41.2–97.7ROR 63.5 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓ | 54.6 EB05 38.3 · IC025 +4.0 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=23 | not reported in cached trials |
| Physical deconditioning | 252 | 62.7 55.0–71.3ROR 63.1 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓ | 56.1 EB05 50.6 · IC025 +5.5 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=252 | not reported in cached trials |
| Blepharospasm | 607 | 60.7 55.9–66.0ROR 61.7 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 54.7 EB05 51.2 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=605 · ♀ 100% (drug 61%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Speech disorder developmental | 278 | 59.7 52.8–67.6ROR 60.2 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓ | 53.8 EB05 48.7 · IC025 +5.4 3/3 methods agree | Not in label — unassessed | serious n=278 · ♀ 37% (drug 61%) · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
Clinical concept groups
MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.
| Concept | Reports | PRR 95% CI | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependence / withdrawal | 10,297 | 20.219.9–20.5 | signal |
| Depression | 2,228 | 4.54.3–4.6 | signal |
| Liver injury | 2,276 | 4.34.1–4.4 | signal |
| Suicidality | 1,557 | 3.63.4–3.7 | signal |
| Interstitial lung disease | 585 | 3.43.2–3.7 | signal |
| Hyperglycaemia / diabetes | 1,651 | 2.72.6–2.8 | signal |
| Serious infection | 3,514 | 2.62.5–2.6 | signal |
| Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy | 361 | 2.52.3–2.8 | signal |
| Hyponatraemia | 343 | 2.42.2–2.7 | signal |
| Anaphylaxis / angioedema | 491 | 2.22.0–2.4 | signal |
| Seizure | 724 | 2.11.9–2.2 | raised |
| Fall / fracture | 1,370 | 2.01.9–2.1 | raised |
| Severe cutaneous reaction | 246 | 1.91.6–2.1 | raised |
| Gi bleeding | 594 | 1.81.7–2.0 | raised |
| Kidney injury | 1,464 | 1.81.7–1.9 | raised |
| Pancreatitis | 244 | 1.71.5–1.9 | raised |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Tramadol as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT02528253 — A Phase 3 Study of Tanezumab for Chronic Low Back Pain (N=1832, PHASE3; 98 AE terms posted; arms: Placebo (Week 16); Safety Evaluation: Tanezumab 5 mg; Safety Evaluation: Tanezumab 10 mg; Tramadol)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependence | 7,827 | 91.9 89.9–93.9ROR 116.0 · calibrated p 4e-8 ✓ | 78.9 EB05 77.5 · IC025 +6.3 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | serious PRR 50.7 · 100% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Overdose | 3,907 | 10.3 10.0–10.6ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓ | 10.1 EB05 9.8 · IC025 +3.3 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 4.7 · serious PRR 8.1 · 76% consumer | not reported in cached trials |
| Vomiting | 3,421 | 4.1 4.0–4.2ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.307 | 4.1 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 4.7 · serious PRR 3.7 · ♀ 89% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain | 3,085 | 2.8 2.7–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.632 | 2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | Likely indication confounding term in indications; also in warnings | age-adj. PRR 3.3 · serious PRR 2.7 · ♀ 81% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 1/506 (0.2%) on Tramadol (serious AE) |
| Nausea | 2,905 | 2.1 2.0–2.1ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.973 | 2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.3 | NCT02528253: 1/602 (0.2%) on Tramadol (serious AE) |
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 2,710 | 1.2 1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · calibrated p 0.417 | 1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1 | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 1.7 | not reported in cached trials |
| Dyspnoea (shortness of breath) | 2,454 | 2.4 2.3–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.797 | 2.4 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.2 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 2.1 · ♀ 88% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Headache | 2,427 | 2.2 2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.923 | 2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.7 · ♀ 89% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 50/602 (8.3%) on Tramadol; 13/215 (6.0%) control |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 2,425 | 1.6 1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.711 | 1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6 | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 1.8 · ♀ 82% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 2,403 | 1.7 1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.822 | 1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7 | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 1.9 · ♀ 86% (drug 61%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Drug hypersensitivity | 2,274 | 6.6 6.4–6.9ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.099 | 6.6 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6 3/3 methods agree | Labeled (related wording) related wording | age-adj. PRR 8.2 · serious PRR 9.3 · ♀ 94% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 1/602 (0.2%) on Tramadol (serious AE) |
| Drug dependence | 2,191 | 7.6 7.3–8.0ROR 8.0 · calibrated p 0.065 | 7.5 EB05 7.3 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 8.3 · serious PRR 4.9 | not reported in cached trials |
| Dizziness | 2,072 | 2.3 2.2–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.850 | 2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.5 · serious PRR 2.5 · ♀ 87% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 44/602 (7.3%) on Tramadol; 4/215 (1.9%) control |
| Pneumonia (lung infection) | 2,053 | 3.6 3.4–3.7ROR 3.7 · calibrated p 0.433 | 3.6 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.8 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 4.3 · serious PRR 2.4 · ♀ 90% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 1/602 (0.2%) on Tramadol (serious AE) |
| Arthralgia (joint pain) | 2,051 | 2.8 2.7–2.9ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.665 | 2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4 3/3 methods agree | Labeled adverse reaction exact term | age-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 3.1 · ♀ 89% (drug 61%) | NCT02528253: 65/602 (10.8%) on Tramadol; 22/215 (10.2%) control |
Unlabeled candidate signals
These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.
- Hepatic enzyme — n=78, PRR 717.5
- Hypocholesterolaemia — n=97, PRR 258.6
- Facet joint syndrome — n=868, PRR 213.5
- Rheumatic fever — n=1,035, PRR 174.3
- Lupus vulgaris — n=276, PRR 169.5
- Ejection fraction — n=127, PRR 155.8
- Deep vein thrombosis postoperative — n=414, PRR 150.1
- Swollen joint count — n=49, PRR 139.4
- Sensitisation — n=150, PRR 136.6
- Amaurosis fugax — n=192, PRR 122.7
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Tramadol ↔ Seizures.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Tramadol?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Tramadol are dependence, vomiting, pain, nausea, dyspnoea, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Tramadol have an FDA boxed warning?
Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS AND LIFE-THREATENING RISKS FROM USE OF TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE TABLETS Addiction, Abuse, and Misuse Because the use of tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets exposes patients and othe.
Do FAERS signals prove that Tramadol causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 004de5a4-80f8-4040-a6ea-be5e99352a36, effective 20251120; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"TRAMADOL HYDROCHLORIDE") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,201 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
TRAMADOL, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.