← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Adalimumab-Adaz side effects: what 52,421 FDA adverse event reports show

Adalimumab-Adaz · Adalimumab · 1,277 reaction terms · 552,645 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Tumor Necrosis Factor Blocker

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Brand names

Adalimumab

openFDA label

Who reports

52,421 reports · 93% serious · 8,010 with death outcome · 67% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Adalimumab-adaz is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocker indicated for: • Reducing signs and symptoms, inducing major clinical response, inhibiting the progression of structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Adalimumab-adaz is a tumor necrosis factor blocker. Adalimumab-adaz is a recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody with human derived heavy and light chain variable regions and human IgG1:k constant regions.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY SERIOUS INFECTIONS Patients treated with adalimumab products, including Adalimumab-adaz, are at increased risk for developing serious infections that may lead to hospitalization or death [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 4Likely indication confounding 3Reporting / coding artifact 2Lab value / disease marker 9Not in label — unassessed 22
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,237 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody4961,197.2
1,003.2–1,428.6ROR 1,208.6 · calibrated p 4e-18 ✓
293.5 EB05 272.5 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 23.7 (21.6–26.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=496 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris8651,097.8
964.5–1,249.5ROR 1,116.2 · calibrated p 9e-18 ✓
288.5 EB05 272.7 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 27.6 (25.7–29.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=865 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength141630.4
483.1–822.6ROR 632.1 · calibrated p 1e-14 ✓
235.1 EB05 204.3 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 33.1 (27.4–40.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=141 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative1,171602.2
550.0–659.4ROR 615.9 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓
237.6 EB05 226.4 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 21.9 (20.7–23.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,171 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Red blood cell sedimentation rate167591.9
465.7–752.4ROR 593.8 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓
230.7 EB05 202.8 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 20.2 (17.2–23.9)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=167not reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,757510.1
475.5–547.3ROR 527.8 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓
222.2 EB05 213.6 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 23.7 (22.7–24.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,757 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased1,719497.3
463.4–533.7ROR 514.1 · calibrated p 4e-14 ✓
219.7 EB05 211.1 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 17.8 (17.1–18.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,712 · ♀ 99% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Human antichimeric antibody positive187497.1
400.7–616.6ROR 498.9 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
215.3 EB05 190.7 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 27.9 (23.7–32.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=187 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever2,392490.1
461.9–520.2ROR 513.5 · calibrated p 4e-14 ✓
218.4 EB05 211.2 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 18.3 (17.7–18.9)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=2,391 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Synovial fluid analysis47474.1
310.1–724.8ROR 474.6 · calibrated p 9e-13 ✓
198.3 EB05 155.1 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 56.6 (39.4–81.4)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=47 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein485464.3
407.2–529.3ROR 468.6 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
211.7 EB05 196.4 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 20.2 (18.4–22.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=485 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis57423.1
291.1–615.0ROR 423.6 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
191.4 EB05 153.2 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=56 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia152393.4
314.3–492.5ROR 394.6 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
192.5 EB05 168.1 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 81.9 (65.9–101.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=152 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood956363.7
333.3–397.0ROR 370.5 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
188.8 EB05 178.9 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 22.7 (21.3–24.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=956 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count115353.5
274.8–454.6ROR 354.2 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓
181.1 EB05 155.0 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 27.1 (22.1–33.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=115 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis778351.8
319.5–387.4ROR 357.1 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
185.4 EB05 174.7 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 28.7 (26.6–30.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=778 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive3,029299.0
285.4–313.2ROR 317.2 · calibrated p 6e-12 ✓
170.1 EB05 165.1 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 12.5 (12.2–12.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 106.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra944296.6
272.7–322.6ROR 302.1 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
169.0 EB05 160.1 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 22.0 (20.7–23.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=944 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired227287.2
242.1–340.7ROR 288.4 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
164.1 EB05 147.0 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 26.0 (22.5–30.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=227 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Paradoxical psoriasis172277.3
228.2–337.0ROR 278.2 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
160.2 EB05 141.1 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 119.3 (95.3–149.4)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=164 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal711266.2
242.1–292.6ROR 269.8 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
158.5 EB05 148.9 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 20.6 (19.1–22.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=711 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive2,291264.8
251.3–279.0ROR 276.8 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
158.5 EB05 153.1 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 13.2 (12.7–13.6)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2,290 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Musculoskeletal deformity86230.2
176.4–300.3ROR 230.5 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
141.1 EB05 117.8 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 49.2 (37.9–63.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=86 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Pemphigus3,946186.5
179.7–193.5ROR 201.6 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
126.8 EB05 123.5 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 10.5 (10.4–10.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 79.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal1,968177.7
168.6–187.3ROR 184.6 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
122.6 EB05 118.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 14.5 (14.0–15.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,968 · ♀ 94% (drug 67%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ileocaecal resection101175.0
138.5–221.3ROR 175.4 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
118.8 EB05 100.6 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 55.0 (43.1–70.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=101 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection2,985165.9
159.1–173.0ROR 175.9 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
116.9 EB05 113.4 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 14.3 (14.0–14.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 76.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Body height below normal190165.4
139.6–195.9ROR 166.0 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
115.4 EB05 102.3 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 27.9 (23.8–32.8)
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=190 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Hand deformity3,773162.4
156.5–168.5ROR 174.9 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
115.2 EB05 112.1 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 11.3 (11.2–11.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 77.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Seronegative arthritis314155.6
136.6–177.3ROR 156.5 · calibrated p 4e-9 ✓
111.0 EB05 101.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 19.0 (16.9–21.3)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=314 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Folliculitis2,836151.6
145.3–158.2ROR 160.2 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
109.6 EB05 106.3 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 14.9 (14.6–15.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 80.1 · ♀ 99% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Short stature70146.5
111.3–192.7ROR 146.7 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
104.0 EB05 85.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=70not reported in cached trials
Cutaneous leishmaniasis62130.4
97.9–173.8ROR 130.6 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
95.4 EB05 77.1 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=61 · ♀ 33% (drug 67%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Vaginal flatulence75130.0
100.1–168.7ROR 130.2 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
95.6 EB05 78.8 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 37.5 (28.7–49.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=75 · ♀ 100% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Bone erosion866129.5
120.0–139.8ROR 131.7 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
97.5 EB05 92.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 15.5 (14.6–16.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=865 · ♀ 99% (drug 67%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Steroid dependence206128.0
109.4–149.8ROR 128.5 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
96.0 EB05 85.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 60.4 (50.8–71.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=206 · ♀ 27% (drug 67%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Interstitial lung disease1,9268.27.8–8.5signal
Liver injury5,8597.97.7–8.1signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes3,3653.93.8–4.0signal
Serious infection6,9023.63.5–3.7signal
Depression2,4713.53.4–3.7signal
Tendon disorder2973.12.8–3.5signal
Opportunistic infection9872.92.7–3.1signal
Pancreatitis5372.72.5–2.9signal
Gi bleeding1,1372.52.4–2.6signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy3731.81.7–2.0raised
Anaphylaxis / angioedema5391.71.6–1.9raised
Fall / fracture1,4141.51.4–1.6raised
Malignancy1,3941.51.4–1.6raised
Osteonecrosis2031.41.2–1.6raised
Stroke7491.21.1–1.3raised
Venous thromboembolism6441.21.1–1.3raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Adalimumab-Adaz as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)11,3353.5
3.4–3.5ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.352
3.4 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 6.2 (6.2–6.2)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.0 · serious PRR 5.8not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)9,2114.3
4.2–4.4ROR 5.0 · calibrated p 0.237
4.2 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 8.5 (8.5–8.5)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.2 · serious PRR 4.8not reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid arthritis6,24823.3
22.8–23.9ROR 26.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
22.1 EB05 21.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 5.7 (5.7–5.7)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
age-adj. PRR 20.4 · serious PRR 16.7 · ♀ 95% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Pain6,2344.1
4.0–4.2ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.297
4.0 EB05 4.0 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 6.1 (6.1–6.1)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 4.1 · serious PRR 3.9 · ♀ 89% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)6,0785.9
5.8–6.1ROR 6.6 · calibrated p 0.117
5.9 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 6.3 (6.3–6.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 5.4 · serious PRR 6.5 · ♀ 88% (drug 67%)NCT03906136: 7/190 (3.7%) on Adalimumab-Adaz
Rash5,1534.8
4.7–4.9ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.213
4.7 EB05 4.6 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 8.5 (8.5–8.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 4.7 · serious PRR 6.5 · ♀ 92% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated4,8866.6
6.4–6.7ROR 7.1 · calibrated p 0.094
6.5 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 7.0 (7.0–7.0)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 5.9 · serious PRR 6.0not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4,7243.0
2.9–3.0ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.582
2.9 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 11.5 (11.5–11.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 3.2NCT03906136: 1/190 (0.5%) on Adalimumab-Adaz (serious AE)
Drug intolerance4,58520.0
19.4–20.5ROR 21.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.0 EB05 18.6 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 8.9 (8.8–8.9)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 22.9 · serious PRR 19.2 · ♀ 93% (drug 67%)not reported in cached trials
Nausea4,4952.3
2.2–2.3ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.855
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 8.9 (8.8–8.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 2.7 · ♀ 91% (drug 67%)NCT03906136: 12/190 (6.3%) on Adalimumab-Adaz
Headache4,4572.9
2.8–2.9ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.616
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 7.9 (7.8–7.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 3.6NCT03906136: 12/190 (6.3%) on Adalimumab-Adaz
Alopecia (hair loss)4,2598.8
8.6–9.1ROR 9.5 · calibrated p 0.038 ✓
8.6 EB05 8.4 · IC025 +3.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers: PRR 8.4 (8.3–8.5)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 8.0 · serious PRR 11.4 · ♀ 98% (drug 67%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: TNF-inhibitors (adalimumab) ↔ Drug-induced lupus.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Adalimumab-Adaz?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Adalimumab-Adaz are fatigue, rheumatoid arthritis, pain, arthralgia, rash, diarrhoea. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Adalimumab-Adaz have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: SERIOUS INFECTIONS and MALIGNANCY SERIOUS INFECTIONS Patients treated with adalimumab products, including Adalimumab-adaz, are at increased risk for developing serious infections that may lead to hospitalization or death [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] .

Do FAERS signals prove that Adalimumab-Adaz causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.