← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Clindamycin side effects: what 28,215 FDA adverse event reports show

Clindamycin · 1,212 reaction terms · 120,657 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

28,215 reports · 75% serious · 2,350 with death outcome · 62% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

CLINICAL STUDIES In one 12-week multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel comparison clinical trial in which patients used CLINDAGEL (clindamycin phosphate topical gel, 1%) once daily or the vehicle gel once daily, in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity, CLINDAGEL applied once daily was more effective than the vehicle applied once daily.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION CLINDAGEL (clindamycin phosphate) topical gel, 1%, a topical antibiotic, contains clindamycin phosphate, USP, at a concentration equivalent to 10 mg clindamycin per gram in a gel v.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 2Lab value / disease marker 1Not in label — unassessed 36
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers rather than clinicians. 1,172 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Babesiosis34102.4
71.6–146.6ROR 102.6 · χ² 2,908 / p <1e-300
85.8 EB05 64.2 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Graft infection3277.6
53.9–111.7ROR 77.7 · χ² 2,119 / p <1e-300
67.5 EB05 50.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Microsporidia infection2965.9
45.1–96.4ROR 66.0 · χ² 1,642 / p <1e-300
58.4 EB05 42.6 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Genital abscess2957.1
39.1–83.3ROR 57.1 · χ² 1,431 / p <1e-300
51.3 EB05 37.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29not reported in cached trials
Scrotal abscess2654.9
36.8–81.7ROR 54.9 · χ² 1,229 / p 1e-269
49.4 EB05 35.4 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%)not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder6447.0
36.5–60.4ROR 47.1 · χ² 2,662 / p <1e-300
43.7 EB05 35.4 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=64not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary13742.5
35.8–50.4ROR 42.7 · χ² 5,205 / p <1e-300
40.0 EB05 34.7 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=137not reported in cached trials
Type iv hypersensitivity reaction14240.8
34.5–48.3ROR 41.0 · χ² 5,190 / p <1e-300
38.5 EB05 33.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=141 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia23338.9
34.2–44.4ROR 39.3 · χ² 8,144 / p <1e-300
36.9 EB05 33.1 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=233not reported in cached trials
Aortic calcification2634.2
23.1–50.6ROR 34.2 · χ² 769 / p 2e-169
32.0 EB05 23.0 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26not reported in cached trials
Acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis31331.3
28.0–35.0ROR 31.6 · χ² 8,777 / p <1e-300
30.0 EB05 27.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 23.0 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Toxic shock syndrome2530.5
20.5–45.5ROR 30.5 · χ² 657 / p 3e-145
28.8 EB05 20.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema3130.2
21.1–43.2ROR 30.2 · χ² 812 / p 6e-179
28.6 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Primary sequestrum3529.4
21.0–41.2ROR 29.5 · χ² 897 / p 3e-197
27.9 EB05 21.0 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Glomerulosclerosis2226.8
17.5–40.9ROR 26.8 · χ² 502 / p 2e-111
25.3 EB05 17.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hidradenitis29626.2
23.3–29.4ROR 26.4 · χ² 6,896 / p <1e-300
25.3 EB05 22.9 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=199not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion10426.1
21.4–31.7ROR 26.1 · χ² 2,395 / p <1e-300
25.1 EB05 21.3 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=104not reported in cached trials
Red man syndrome3025.8
18.0–37.2ROR 25.9 · χ² 668 / p 1e-147
24.7 EB05 18.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=26 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Intervertebral disc space narrowing2725.8
17.6–37.8ROR 25.8 · χ² 597 / p 3e-132
24.6 EB05 17.7 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=27 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Abscess neck2224.7
16.2–37.8ROR 24.8 · χ² 462 / p 8e-103
23.5 EB05 16.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22not reported in cached trials
Pneumocystis jirovecii infection3623.9
17.2–33.3ROR 23.9 · χ² 744 / p 5e-164
22.9 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%)not reported in cached trials
Cerebral toxoplasmosis2923.8
16.4–34.4ROR 23.8 · χ² 590 / p 1e-130
22.7 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=29 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Groin abscess3523.0
16.4–32.1ROR 23.0 · χ² 692 / p 9e-153
22.1 EB05 16.6 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=35not reported in cached trials
Osteosclerosis4722.8
17.1–30.5ROR 22.8 · χ² 929 / p 3e-204
22.0 EB05 17.2 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Clostridium test positive6322.1
17.2–28.3ROR 22.1 · χ² 1,210 / p 2e-265
21.3 EB05 17.3 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=59not reported in cached trials
Loss of employment8822.1
17.9–27.3ROR 22.1 · χ² 1,698 / p <1e-300
21.4 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=88 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%)not reported in cached trials
Abscess jaw3021.8
15.2–31.4ROR 21.8 · χ² 558 / p 9e-124
21.0 EB05 15.3 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=28 · ♀ 100% (drug 62%)NCT00729937: 1/249 (0.4%) on Clindamycin; 8/617 (1.3%) control (serious AE)
Pseudomembranous colitis5518.6
14.3–24.4ROR 18.7 · χ² 878 / p 2e-193
18.1 EB05 14.4 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious n=54 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Osteolysis5018.5
14.0–24.5ROR 18.6 · χ² 793 / p 1e-174
18.0 EB05 14.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50not reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease42617.6
16.0–19.3ROR 17.8 · χ² 6,491 / p <1e-300
17.2 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.1not reported in cached trials
Megacolon3617.5
12.6–24.3ROR 17.5 · χ² 530 / p 1e-117
16.9 EB05 12.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Necrotising fasciitis7917.0
13.6–21.3ROR 17.1 · χ² 1,149 / p 3e-252
16.6 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=79 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%) · 100% clinicianNCT00729937: 1/248 (0.4%) on Clindamycin (serious AE)
Exposed bone in jaw4816.6
12.5–22.1ROR 16.7 · χ² 674 / p 6e-149
16.1 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=48 · 74% consumernot reported in cached trials
Bone demineralisation2316.4
10.9–24.8ROR 16.4 · χ² 311 / p 6e-70
15.7 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22not reported in cached trials
Rash morbilliform6016.4
12.7–21.2ROR 16.4 · χ² 834 / p 9e-184
16.0 EB05 12.8 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=59 · ♀ 40% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast abscess2216.4
10.7–25.0ROR 16.4 · χ² 296 / p 1e-66
15.6 EB05 10.6 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=22NCT00729937: 1/617 (0.2%) control (serious AE)
Methaemoglobinaemia4815.8
11.9–21.0ROR 15.8 · χ² 637 / p 6e-141
15.3 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · ♀ 0% (drug 62%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Clostridial infection6714.9
11.7–18.9ROR 14.9 · χ² 835 / p 7e-184
14.5 EB05 11.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=62not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Clindamycin as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (4 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,4591.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · χ² 284 / p 5e-64
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 2.2not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,9162.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · χ² 1,315 / p 3e-288
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3NCT00729937: 81/249 (32.5%) on Clindamycin; 96/617 (15.6%) control
Rash1,6732.9
2.7–3.0ROR 3.0 · χ² 2,077 / p <1e-300
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.4NCT00729937: 4/249 (1.6%) on Clindamycin; 9/617 (1.5%) control
Nausea1,6641.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · χ² 355 / p 2e-79
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.8NCT00729937: 28/249 (11.2%) on Clindamycin; 102/617 (16.5%) control
Pain1,5301.8
1.8–1.9ROR 1.9 · χ² 613 / p 1e-135
1.8 EB05 1.8 · IC025 +0.8Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 1.9NCT00729937: 1/630 (0.2%) on Clindamycin (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,3421.1
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · χ² 27 / p 1e-7
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Acute kidney injury (sudden kidney damage)1,3286.5
6.2–6.9ROR 6.8 · χ² 6,200 / p <1e-300
6.5 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 5.0 · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease1,30212.8
12.2–13.5ROR 13.4 · χ² 13,989 / p <1e-300
12.6 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.8not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)1,2891.2
1.2–1.3ROR 1.2 · χ² 59 / p 9e-15
1.2 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.2Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,2071.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 268 / p 2e-60
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Pyrexia (fever)1,1952.6
2.4–2.7ROR 2.6 · χ² 1,160 / p 2e-254
2.6 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.3NCT00729937: 1/630 (0.2%) on Clindamycin (serious AE)
Renal failure (kidney failure)1,0746.0
5.7–6.4ROR 6.2 · χ² 4,468 / p <1e-300
6.0 EB05 5.7 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.6NCT00729937: 1/248 (0.4%) on Clindamycin (serious AE)
Vomiting1,0111.6
1.5–1.7ROR 1.6 · χ² 234 / p 5e-53
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5NCT00729937: 14/249 (5.6%) on Clindamycin; 40/617 (6.5%) control
Headache9851.2
1.1–1.2ROR 1.2 · χ² 25 / p 3e-7
1.2 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 1.5NCT00729937: 27/249 (10.8%) on Clindamycin; 76/617 (12.3%) control

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Clindamycin ↔ Clostridioides difficile colitis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Clindamycin?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Clindamycin are drug hypersensitivity, diarrhoea, rash, nausea, pain, acute kidney injury. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Clindamycin have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Clindamycin has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Clindamycin causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-08. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.