← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate side effects: what 46,150 FDA adverse event reports show

Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate · 1,234 reaction terms · 380,491 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Corticosteroid

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

46,150 reports · 89% serious · 8,762 with death outcome · 60% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Methylprednisolone Tablets are indicated in the following conditions: 1. Endocrine Disorders Primary or secondary adrenocortical insufficiency (hydrocortisone or cortisone is the first choice; synthetic analogs may be used in conjunction with mineralocorticoids where applicable; in infancy mineralocorticoid supplementation is of particular importance).

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Methylprednisolone Tablets contain methylprednisolone which is a glucocorticoid. Glucocorticoids are adrenocortical steroids, both naturally occurring and synthetic, which are readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 5Lab value / disease marker 11Not in label — unassessed 23
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,194 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Vaginal flatulence150441.5
352.4–553.1ROR 442.9 · calibrated p 4e-13 ✓
216.6 EB05 189.0 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 6.1 (5.2–7.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=150 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Hepatic enzyme66410.1
293.7–572.6ROR 410.7 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
202.0 EB05 164.3 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 28.6 (21.6–38.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=66 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody262295.2
252.7–345.0ROR 296.9 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
176.0 EB05 158.8 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.6 (4.1–5.2)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=262 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired205275.4
231.5–327.7ROR 276.6 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
168.2 EB05 149.7 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.4 (7.3–9.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=205 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Blood pressure diastolic abnormal919254.1
234.5–275.4ROR 259.2 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
161.9 EB05 153.3 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 23.2 (21.5–24.9)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=847 · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Blood pressure systolic abnormal826226.4
208.3–246.1ROR 230.5 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
150.2 EB05 141.8 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 23.0 (21.3–24.8)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=765 · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hypocholesterolaemia95203.3
159.6–259.1ROR 203.8 · calibrated p 6e-10 ✓
136.3 EB05 114.8 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 10.2 (8.2–12.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=95 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Lupus vulgaris356194.5
171.8–220.1ROR 196.0 · calibrated p 5e-10 ✓
134.9 EB05 123.5 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.2–4.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=356 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Swollen joint count72188.4
143.0–248.0ROR 188.7 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
128.4 EB05 105.4 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.9 (4.6–7.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=72 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Neurologic neglect syndrome158178.9
148.8–215.2ROR 179.6 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
126.2 EB05 110.5 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 36.5 (30.2–44.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=158 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Human bocavirus infection47149.1
107.2–207.4ROR 149.3 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
107.3 EB05 83.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.2 (2.4–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=47 · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Retinitis394140.6
125.6–157.3ROR 141.8 · calibrated p 8e-9 ✓
106.7 EB05 98.1 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.6 (4.2–5.1)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious n=394 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Rheumatic fever984132.3
123.3–141.9ROR 135.1 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
102.1 EB05 96.9 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.8 (2.7–3.0)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=984 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Seronegative arthritis252131.7
114.5–151.5ROR 132.4 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
101.2 EB05 91.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 9.1 (8.0–10.4)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=252 · ♀ 93% (drug 60%) · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Facet joint syndrome703130.5
120.1–141.9ROR 132.6 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
101.0 EB05 94.9 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.0 (2.8–3.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=703 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Dislocation of vertebra496130.5
118.1–144.2ROR 131.9 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
100.9 EB05 93.6 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.8 (3.5–4.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=496 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 96% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood443128.1
115.3–142.3ROR 129.3 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
99.4 EB05 91.9 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.4 (3.1–3.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=443 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative408119.5
107.1–133.2ROR 120.5 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
94.1 EB05 86.7 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.4 (2.1–2.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=408 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Swollen joint count increased612111.0
101.6–121.2ROR 112.5 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
88.9 EB05 83.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.5 (2.3–2.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=612 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Carotid artery thrombosis157102.4
86.1–121.7ROR 102.7 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
82.7 EB05 72.4 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 35.9 (29.7–43.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=157 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
X-ray abnormal324100.8
89.4–113.7ROR 101.5 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
82.1 EB05 74.8 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.0 (2.7–3.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=324 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
C-reactive protein16298.7
83.3–117.0ROR 99.1 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
80.3 EB05 70.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.0 (1.8–2.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=162 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Peripheral venous disease64387.2
80.2–94.8ROR 88.4 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
73.0 EB05 68.4 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.6 (3.3–3.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=643 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive1,10383.5
78.3–88.9ROR 85.5 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
70.4 EB05 67.0 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.4 (2.3–2.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 45.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Overlap syndrome10480.6
65.5–99.3ROR 80.8 · calibrated p 7e-7 ✓
67.7 EB05 57.4 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 7.6 (6.2–9.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=104 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 91% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Rheumatoid factor positive80273.3
68.1–79.0ROR 74.6 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
63.0 EB05 59.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.3 (2.2–2.5)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=802 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Temperature regulation disorder25860.8
53.4–69.2ROR 61.1 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
53.4 EB05 48.2 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 15.2 (13.3–17.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=258 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 93% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Helicobacter infection1,20260.7
57.2–64.4ROR 62.3 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
53.5 EB05 51.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.6 (2.5–2.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Adjustment disorder15360.3
51.0–71.4ROR 60.5 · calibrated p 5e-6 ✓
52.9 EB05 46.3 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 35.9 (29.6–43.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=153 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Pemphigus1,43059.0
55.9–62.3ROR 60.9 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
52.2 EB05 50.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.4 (2.3–2.5)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications
serious PRR 33.8 · ♀ 98% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Muscle injury94158.8
55.0–62.9ROR 60.0 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
52.0 EB05 49.3 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.8 (2.7–3.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 36.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 95% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Hypercholesterolaemia1,09658.7
55.2–62.5ROR 60.1 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
52.0 EB05 49.5 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 5.0 (4.7–5.3)
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious PRR 35.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Crystal urine present6357.5
44.3–74.8ROR 57.6 · calibrated p 8e-6 ✓
50.3 EB05 40.8 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 33.8 (25.1–45.4)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=62 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Urinary sediment present7257.4
44.9–73.4ROR 57.5 · calibrated p 7e-6 ✓
50.4 EB05 41.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 32.7 (24.8–43.1)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=72 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Urine leukocyte esterase positive7755.4
43.7–70.2ROR 55.5 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
48.8 EB05 40.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 26.1 (20.1–33.7)
Lab value / disease markerserious n=76 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 100% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Onychomadesis43452.9
48.0–58.5ROR 53.4 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
47.4 EB05 43.7 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.5 (4.1–5.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=434 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 92% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Folliculitis1,06051.9
48.7–55.3ROR 53.1 · calibrated p 9e-6 ✓
46.6 EB05 44.3 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.7 (2.5–2.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 35.3 · ♀ 96% (drug 60%) · 94% clinicianno trial arm names this drug
Death neonatal14151.7
43.5–61.6ROR 51.9 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
46.2 EB05 40.2 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 8.5 (7.1–10.1)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=141 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Bone erosion35951.2
45.9–57.1ROR 51.6 · calibrated p 1e-5 ✓
45.9 EB05 42.1 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.2 (3.7–4.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=358 · ♀ 100% (drug 60%) · 97% clinicianno trial arm names this drug

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Interstitial lung disease1,4216.86.5–7.2signal
Liver injury3,7065.65.5–5.8signal
Opportunistic infection1,3284.54.2–4.7signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema1,0683.93.7–4.1signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes2,8733.83.7–3.9signal
Thrombocytopenia1,7273.63.4–3.8signal
Serious infection6,0113.63.5–3.6signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy5983.43.1–3.6signal
Osteonecrosis3602.82.6–3.2signal
Anaemia1,8382.82.7–2.9signal
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis1,4882.72.6–2.9signal
Gi bleeding1,0742.72.5–2.8signal
Depression1,5422.52.4–2.6signal
Pancreatitis4302.42.2–2.7signal
Severe cutaneous reaction3732.32.1–2.5signal
Kidney injury2,2172.22.1–2.3signal

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

ClinicalTrials.gov returned results-bearing trials mentioning Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate only as a background or rescue medication (NCT01471340, NCT01950819); no trial listing it as the tested intervention was cached, so no trial cross-check is shown.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Off label use (used outside approved label)8,0114.2
4.1–4.3ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.245
4.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.3 (2.3–2.4)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 3.4 · serious PRR 4.8no trial arm names this drug
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)4,3951.5
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.689
1.5 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 1.4 (1.4–1.4)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.6no trial arm names this drug
Fatigue (tiredness)4,2802.5
2.4–2.6ROR 2.7 · calibrated p 0.745
2.5 EB05 2.4 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.0 (2.0–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.9 · ♀ 82% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Headache4,0743.0
2.9–3.1ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.577
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.8 (2.7–2.9)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 3.7 · ♀ 88% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Pain4,0493.0
2.9–3.1ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.566
3.0 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.4 (2.4–2.5)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.8 · serious PRR 2.9 · ♀ 85% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Infusion related reaction (reaction during infusion)3,92228.6
27.8–29.5ROR 31.2 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.0 EB05 26.3 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 4.1 (4.0–4.3)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 21.1 · serious PRR 20.3 · ♀ 83% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Nausea3,8212.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.896
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.3 (2.2–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 2.5 · ♀ 84% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Pyrexia (fever)3,7735.0
4.8–5.2ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.200
4.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.5 (2.4–2.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 3.8 · serious PRR 3.9no trial arm names this drug
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)3,6422.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.593
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.5 · serious PRR 2.5no trial arm names this drug
Rash3,1813.4
3.2–3.5ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.479
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.1 (2.0–2.2)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.9 · serious PRR 4.5 · ♀ 81% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Arthralgia (joint pain)3,0253.3
3.2–3.5ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.485
3.3 EB05 3.2 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.0 (2.0–2.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.6 · serious PRR 3.8 · ♀ 83% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)2,9882.1
2.0–2.2ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.955
2.1 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 1.8 (1.7–1.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.3no trial arm names this drug
Hypertension (high blood pressure)2,9126.3
6.1–6.5ROR 6.7 · calibrated p 0.113
6.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 3.1 (3.0–3.2)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 5.0 · serious PRR 4.9 · ♀ 83% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug
Vomiting2,8312.8
2.7–2.9ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.670
2.7 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Corticosteroids: PRR 2.2 (2.1–2.3)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.2 · serious PRR 2.5 · ♀ 83% (drug 60%)no trial arm names this drug

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methotrexate Sodium ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate are fatigue, headache, pain, infusion related reaction, nausea, pyrexia. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.