← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Naproxen 220Mg side effects: what 13,479 FDA adverse event reports show

Naproxen Sodium 220Mg · 1,083 reaction terms · 251,757 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Naproxen Sodium 220Mg (Naproxen Sodium 220Mg)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

13,479 reports · 77% serious · 3,768 with death outcome · 77% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

(s) temporarily relieves minor aches and pains due to: headache minor pain of arthritis muscular aches backache menstrual cramps toothache the common cold temporarily reduces fever

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Likely indication confounding 1Reporting / coding artifact 1Lab value / disease marker 9Not in label — unassessed 29
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,043 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Hepatic enzyme711,625.5
1,164.7–2,268.8ROR 1,634.1 · calibrated p 5e-19 ✓
650.4 EB05 533.0 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=71 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein4271,396.6
1,226.3–1,590.5ROR 1,442.2 · calibrated p 4e-19 ✓
708.1 EB05 653.5 · IC025 +8.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=427 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength1041,276.2
984.5–1,654.5ROR 1,286.2 · calibrated p 4e-18 ✓
617.4 EB05 524.1 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=104 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative8701,251.9
1,146.5–1,367.0ROR 1,338.2 · calibrated p 8e-19 ✓
679.4 EB05 642.3 · IC025 +8.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=870 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris5231,230.5
1,098.1–1,378.8ROR 1,280.1 · calibrated p 2e-18 ✓
666.4 EB05 619.9 · IC025 +8.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=523 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count1061,186.9
921.6–1,528.5ROR 1,196.3 · calibrated p 9e-18 ✓
597.0 EB05 507.5 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=106 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody259993.2
850.3–1,160.2ROR 1,012.7 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓
577.4 EB05 520.7 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=259 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,214981.1
914.8–1,052.3ROR 1,078.1 · calibrated p 1e-17 ✓
593.2 EB05 565.7 · IC025 +8.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,214 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased1,114869.6
809.6–934.1ROR 947.9 · calibrated p 5e-17 ✓
550.1 EB05 523.5 · IC025 +8.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,114 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever1,382723.5
680.2–769.6ROR 806.1 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓
488.6 EB05 467.4 · IC025 +8.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,382 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood625702.4
639.9–770.9ROR 736.5 · calibrated p 9e-16 ✓
475.0 EB05 444.6 · IC025 +8.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=624 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia93676.1
530.1–862.4ROR 680.8 · calibrated p 5e-15 ✓
428.1 EB05 359.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=93 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 98% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra664664.8
607.9–727.1ROR 699.2 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
458.0 EB05 429.5 · IC025 +8.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=664 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal464548.3
493.9–608.8ROR 567.9 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓
397.6 EB05 368.1 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=464 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease957491.8
458.2–527.9ROR 529.3 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓
369.9 EB05 350.6 · IC025 +8.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=957 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Duodenal ulcer perforation1,751488.8
464.5–514.4ROR 561.6 · calibrated p 2e-14 ✓
369.4 EB05 355.1 · IC025 +8.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 277.7 · ♀ 99% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive1,332468.3
441.5–496.8ROR 519.5 · calibrated p 4e-14 ✓
357.2 EB05 341.4 · IC025 +8.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,332 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive1,604454.7
431.2–479.5ROR 516.0 · calibrated p 4e-14 ✓
349.5 EB05 335.4 · IC025 +8.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 264.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Joint laxity67443.0
337.7–581.1ROR 445.2 · calibrated p 5e-13 ✓
313.2 EB05 255.1 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Synovial fluid analysis19435.0
261.4–723.8ROR 435.6 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
253.0 EB05 171.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=19not reported in cached trials
Retinitis362431.8
384.7–484.6ROR 443.7 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
331.3 EB05 303.6 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=362 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Congenital hiatus hernia46407.9
294.8–564.3ROR 409.3 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
284.3 EB05 221.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=46 · ♀ 0% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Human antichimeric antibody positive69397.9
305.5–518.3ROR 399.9 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
290.7 EB05 237.5 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=69 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal1,282390.0
367.7–413.7ROR 430.9 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
309.7 EB05 295.8 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,282 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Tender joint count17389.2
228.6–662.6ROR 389.7 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
230.4 EB05 152.4 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, hypersomnia type20388.3
237.8–634.1ROR 388.9 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
239.3 EB05 163.6 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=20 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Seronegative arthritis220380.0
328.2–440.1ROR 386.3 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
296.9 EB05 265.4 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=219 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury1,464338.4
320.6–357.1ROR 379.5 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
276.4 EB05 264.7 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 225.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Porphyria acute242331.1
288.5–380.1ROR 337.2 · calibrated p 4e-12 ✓
266.8 EB05 239.7 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=242 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection1,742321.2
305.9–337.2ROR 368.7 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
265.0 EB05 254.7 · IC025 +7.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 210.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Acquired porphyria12317.4
170.5–590.8ROR 317.7 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
185.8 EB05 113.3 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12not reported in cached trials
Folliculitis1,731313.7
298.8–329.4ROR 359.8 · calibrated p 2e-12 ✓
259.9 EB05 249.8 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 229.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii985281.6
263.6–300.7ROR 303.7 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
237.0 EB05 224.8 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=985 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus1,831269.1
256.8–281.9ROR 311.2 · calibrated p 7e-12 ✓
228.5 EB05 219.9 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 172.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity1,900264.6
252.8–277.0ROR 307.9 · calibrated p 7e-12 ✓
225.3 EB05 217.0 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 184.1 · ♀ 99% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lip dry1,254253.4
239.3–268.4ROR 279.3 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
216.9 EB05 207.0 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,253 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Red blood cell sedimentation rate abnormal309238.4
211.7–268.5ROR 244.0 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓
203.9 EB05 185.5 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=309 · ♀ 99% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type850236.9
220.8–254.1ROR 252.7 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
204.4 EB05 193.1 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=848 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Short stature34232.8
162.4–333.8ROR 233.4 · calibrated p 4e-10 ✓
181.8 EB05 136.0 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Loose body in joint32212.5
146.9–307.4ROR 213.0 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
168.2 EB05 124.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Interstitial lung disease87314.313.4–15.2signal
Liver injury2,72814.213.7–14.7signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes1,8098.27.8–8.5signal
Depression1,3497.57.1–7.9signal
Serious infection2,6245.35.1–5.5signal
Pancreatitis2424.74.1–5.3signal
Gi bleeding4824.13.8–4.5signal
Tendon disorder753.12.4–3.8signal
Fall / fracture7032.92.7–3.1signal
Severe cutaneous reaction1212.52.1–3.0signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema1622.01.7–2.3raised
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy891.71.4–2.1raised
Anaemia3021.61.4–1.8raised
Myocardial infarction1931.51.3–1.7raised
Thrombocytopenia1911.31.2–1.6raised
Suicidality2061.31.1–1.5raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Naproxen 220Mg as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)2,9413.5
3.4–3.6ROR 4.2 · calibrated p 0.347
3.5 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 4.3 · serious PRR 6.2not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)2,6895.4
5.2–5.6ROR 6.5 · calibrated p 0.122
5.4 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 5.3 · serious PRR 7.4not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)2,5684.6
4.5–4.8ROR 5.5 · calibrated p 0.190
4.6 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 5.0 · serious PRR 6.4 · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pain2,5376.4
6.2–6.7ROR 7.7 · calibrated p 0.075
6.4 EB05 6.2 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
age-adj. PRR 6.8 · serious PRR 7.3NCT01118273: 1/27 (3.7%) on Naproxen 220Mg
Rash2,3318.4
8.1–8.7ROR 9.9 · calibrated p 0.033 ✓
8.4 EB05 8.1 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 9.0 · serious PRR 13.7 · ♀ 98% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)2,2628.5
8.2–8.9ROR 10.1 · calibrated p 0.032 ✓
8.5 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 8.1 · serious PRR 11.3not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)2,2615.5
5.3–5.7ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.127
5.5 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 5.4 · serious PRR 6.9not reported in cached trials
Condition aggravated2,15311.2
10.7–11.6ROR 13.1 · calibrated p 0.012 ✓
11.1 EB05 10.7 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 10.3 · serious PRR 12.3not reported in cached trials
Joint swelling2,13428.0
27.0–29.2ROR 33.1 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
27.5 EB05 26.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 24.9 · serious PRR 35.3 · ♀ 98% (drug 77%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fibromyalgia2,089146.5
140.5–152.7ROR 173.1 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
133.6 EB05 128.9 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 131.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 77%)not reported in cached trials
Synovitis2,086203.5
195.0–212.3ROR 240.5 · calibrated p 8e-11 ✓
179.5 EB05 173.1 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 141.0 · ♀ 99% (drug 77%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid arthritis2,07429.1
27.9–30.2ROR 34.2 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
28.5 EB05 27.5 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
age-adj. PRR 28.7 · serious PRR 26.0 · ♀ 98% (drug 77%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dizziness2,0376.4
6.1–6.6ROR 7.3 · calibrated p 0.086
6.4 EB05 6.1 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 6.2 · serious PRR 8.2NCT01118273: 1/27 (3.7%) on Naproxen 220Mg
Abdominal discomfort2,00118.8
18.1–19.6ROR 21.9 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
18.6 EB05 17.9 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 20.1 · serious PRR 30.1not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methotrexate Sodium ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Naproxen 220Mg?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Naproxen 220Mg are fatigue, pain, rash, arthralgia, diarrhoea, vomiting. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Naproxen 220Mg have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Naproxen 220Mg has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Naproxen 220Mg causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.