Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% side effects: what 35,579 FDA adverse event reports show
Drug class
Not stated in label
Label matched
Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1% (Diclofenac Sodium)
Who reports
35,579 reports · 78% serious · 6,894 with death outcome · 74% female
Used for
for the temporary relief of arthritis pain ONLY in the following areas: hand, wrist, elbow (upper body areas) foot, ankle, knee (lower body areas) this product may take up to 7 days to work for arthritis pain; it is not for immediate relief. If no pain relief in 7 days, stop use
Boxed warning
None in the current label
Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals
What the badges mean
- Lab value / disease marker A laboratory result, investigation or disease-activity marker (antibody positive, CRP abnormal, swollen joint count) not described in the label. These usually mirror the monitored disease or testing protocol rather than a drug effect; not screened further.
- Not in label — unassessed Not found in the label text, not an artifact pattern. This is a genuine candidate for a formal causality assessment (Bradford Hill / WHO-UMC); it has NOT had one here.
- No label text to screen No validated FDA label was retrievable for this product, so the screen could not run. Disproportionality only.
Strongest disproportionality signals
Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,172 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lupus vulgaris | 840 | 1,455.5 1,282.9–1,651.4ROR 1,490.7 · calibrated p 3e-19 ✓ | 411.8 EB05 388.9 · IC025 +8.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=840 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody | 466 | 1,401.6 1,185.5–1,657.1ROR 1,420.2 · calibrated p 6e-19 ✓ | 404.3 EB05 374.4 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=466 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Swollen joint count increased | 2,042 | 1,143.1 1,061.5–1,230.9ROR 1,212.6 · calibrated p 3e-18 ✓ | 384.2 EB05 370.5 · IC025 +8.4 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=2,041 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatic fever | 2,767 | 1,039.6 977.7–1,105.4ROR 1,127.2 · calibrated p 6e-18 ✓ | 372.2 EB05 360.7 · IC025 +8.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=2,767 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Deep vein thrombosis postoperative | 1,238 | 1,029.6 938.9–1,129.0ROR 1,066.6 · calibrated p 1e-17 ✓ | 369.7 EB05 352.7 · IC025 +8.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,238 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hepatic enzyme | 88 | 1,021.7 722.1–1,445.4ROR 1,024.2 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓ | 343.1 EB05 287.0 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=88 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Grip strength | 144 | 983.4 752.3–1,285.5ROR 987.4 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓ | 348.7 EB05 303.4 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=144 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| C-reactive protein | 511 | 770.5 675.3–879.1ROR 781.7 · calibrated p 6e-16 ✓ | 327.6 EB05 304.4 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=511 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive | 3,987 | 764.3 729.9–800.4ROR 860.6 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓ | 330.0 EB05 321.5 · IC025 +8.3 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious PRR 244.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Facet joint syndrome | 1,628 | 636.8 594.0–682.7ROR 667.3 · calibrated p 3e-15 ✓ | 303.1 EB05 291.0 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,628 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Duodenal ulcer perforation | 3,741 | 619.6 592.4–648.0ROR 692.2 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓ | 299.8 EB05 291.8 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 220.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatoid factor positive | 2,910 | 606.5 576.4–638.2ROR 660.5 · calibrated p 3e-15 ✓ | 296.5 EB05 287.6 · IC025 +8.1 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=2,909 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Swollen joint count | 121 | 575.7 447.8–740.2ROR 577.7 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓ | 276.9 EB05 237.9 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=121 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Adjustment disorder with depressed mood | 942 | 521.8 478.1–569.4ROR 535.9 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓ | 273.7 EB05 259.4 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=942 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Pemphigus | 5,732 | 508.9 492.0–526.5ROR 606.4 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓ | 271.4 EB05 265.6 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 200.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hypocholesterolaemia | 139 | 489.0 390.3–612.7ROR 490.9 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓ | 256.5 EB05 222.7 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=139 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Retinitis | 718 | 448.2 406.8–493.7ROR 457.4 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓ | 251.6 EB05 236.6 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=718 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Dislocation of vertebra | 944 | 437.7 402.5–476.0ROR 449.6 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓ | 248.7 EB05 235.7 · IC025 +7.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=944 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| X-ray abnormal | 729 | 409.7 372.8–450.1ROR 418.2 · calibrated p 4e-13 ✓ | 239.1 EB05 224.9 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=729 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hand deformity | 5,238 | 396.2 383.1–409.7ROR 464.4 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓ | 235.7 EB05 230.4 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 188.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Helicobacter infection | 3,697 | 337.2 324.2–350.6ROR 376.1 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓ | 213.4 EB05 207.7 · IC025 +7.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 166.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, hypersomnia type | 34 | 303.6 200.6–459.7ROR 303.9 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 179.7 EB05 134.5 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired | 175 | 279.8 233.7–335.1ROR 281.2 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 185.3 EB05 163.4 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=175 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Muscle injury | 2,608 | 275.6 263.4–288.4ROR 297.3 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓ | 186.9 EB05 181.0 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 149.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Peripheral venous disease | 1,265 | 274.3 256.8–293.0ROR 284.4 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 186.1 EB05 177.6 · IC025 +7.3 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,263 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Seronegative arthritis | 353 | 271.4 239.3–307.8ROR 274.1 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓ | 183.4 EB05 167.9 · IC025 +7.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=353 · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Folliculitis | 3,101 | 253.7 243.6–264.3ROR 277.9 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓ | 176.7 EB05 171.5 · IC025 +7.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 153.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type | 1,762 | 222.7 211.0–235.0ROR 234.2 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 160.9 EB05 154.7 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,762 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Pericarditis | 4,482 | 217.4 210.4–224.7ROR 248.6 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓ | 158.4 EB05 154.5 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 117.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain) | 5,736 | 203.9 198.2–209.8ROR 242.9 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓ | 151.1 EB05 147.8 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 161.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Synovitis | 4,593 | 201.7 195.4–208.2ROR 231.4 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓ | 149.8 EB05 146.2 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 115.5 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| C-reactive protein abnormal | 1,600 | 196.6 186.0–207.9ROR 205.8 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓ | 146.9 EB05 140.9 · IC025 +7.1 3/3 methods agree | Lab value / disease marker | serious n=1,600 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Porphyria acute | 320 | 178.1 157.2–201.8ROR 179.7 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓ | 135.4 EB05 123.4 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=320 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Inspiratory capacity decreased | 62 | 171.4 129.1–227.5ROR 171.7 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓ | 127.4 EB05 103.0 · IC025 +5.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=62 · ♀ 0% (drug 74%) · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Lymphatic fistula | 22 | 165.9 103.3–266.3ROR 166.0 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 116.4 EB05 81.0 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=22 · 100% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Breast cancer stage iii | 1,348 | 156.4 147.4–166.0ROR 162.5 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓ | 123.2 EB05 117.8 · IC025 +6.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,348 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Bone erosion | 689 | 142.4 131.1–154.7ROR 145.2 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓ | 114.2 EB05 107.2 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=688 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 97% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Lip dry | 1,679 | 136.0 129.1–143.3ROR 142.7 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓ | 110.3 EB05 105.9 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,675 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Wound | 5,150 | 134.1 130.4–138.0ROR 156.6 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓ | 109.1 EB05 106.6 · IC025 +6.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 106.0 · serious PRR 95.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Grip strength decreased | 1,560 | 128.0 121.3–135.1ROR 133.8 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓ | 104.9 EB05 100.6 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious n=1,553 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 94% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Clinical concept groups
MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.
| Concept | Reports | PRR 95% CI | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver injury | 6,820 | 13.613.3–13.9 | signal |
| Interstitial lung disease | 1,526 | 9.59.1–10.0 | signal |
| Hyperglycaemia / diabetes | 3,523 | 6.15.9–6.2 | signal |
| Serious infection | 5,411 | 4.24.0–4.3 | signal |
| Depression | 1,941 | 4.13.9–4.3 | signal |
| Gi bleeding | 1,145 | 3.73.5–3.9 | signal |
| Pancreatitis | 377 | 2.82.5–3.1 | signal |
| Anaphylaxis / angioedema | 578 | 2.72.5–3.0 | signal |
| Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy | 328 | 2.42.1–2.7 | signal |
| Fall / fracture | 1,406 | 2.22.1–2.3 | signal |
| Thrombocytopenia | 773 | 2.11.9–2.2 | raised |
| Severe cutaneous reaction | 233 | 1.81.6–2.1 | raised |
| Tendon disorder | 117 | 1.81.5–2.2 | raised |
| Kidney injury | 1,318 | 1.71.6–1.8 | raised |
| Hyponatraemia | 224 | 1.61.4–1.9 | raised |
| Anaemia | 789 | 1.61.4–1.7 | raised |
Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)
✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov
Largest completed trials with posted results that list Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).
- NCT03172780 — A Bioequivalence Study Using Clinical Endpoint for Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1% in Osteoarthritis Knee" (N=1220, PHASE3; 4 AE terms posted; arms: Diclofenac Sodium Gel; Voltaren® Gel; Placebo Gel)
- NCT02121002 — Study Comparing a Generic Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1% to Voltaren in the Treatment of Subjects With Oste (N=1176, PHASE3; 6 AE terms posted; arms: Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1%; Voltaren Topical Gel, 1%; Vehicle Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel)
Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.
Most frequently reported reactions
By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.
| Reaction | Reports | PRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/p | EBGM EB05 · IC025 | Label screen | Serious-only & strata | Trial cross-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug ineffective (drug did not work) | 7,709 | 3.5 3.4–3.5ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.351 | 3.4 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 3.5 · serious PRR 5.9 | not reported in cached trials |
| Pain | 7,449 | 7.2 7.1–7.4ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓ | 7.1 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 6.3 · serious PRR 8.0 | not reported in cached trials |
| Fatigue (tiredness) | 7,030 | 5.4 5.3–5.5ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.124 | 5.3 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 4.4 · serious PRR 7.1 · ♀ 94% (drug 74%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 6,411 | 35.4 34.6–36.2ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 33.4 EB05 32.7 · IC025 +5.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 26.9 · serious PRR 30.0 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Rash | 6,132 | 8.4 8.2–8.6ROR 10.0 · calibrated p 0.032 ✓ | 8.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 7.3 · serious PRR 13.2 · ♀ 96% (drug 74%) | NCT02121002: 1/391 (0.3%) on Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% |
| Abdominal discomfort | 6,037 | 22.1 21.5–22.6ROR 26.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓ | 21.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.4 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 17.7 · serious PRR 34.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) | not reported in cached trials |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | 5,897 | 118.0 115.0–121.1ROR 141.2 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓ | 98.2 EB05 96.1 · IC025 +6.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 102.2 · serious PRR 74.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Alopecia (hair loss) | 5,795 | 17.9 17.4–18.3ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓ | 17.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +4.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 14.2 · serious PRR 27.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Off label use (used outside approved label) | 5,770 | 3.9 3.8–4.0ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.295 | 3.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9 3/3 methods agree | Reporting / coding artifact | age-adj. PRR 3.8 · serious PRR 4.9 | not reported in cached trials |
| Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain) | 5,736 | 203.9 198.2–209.8ROR 242.9 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓ | 151.1 EB05 147.8 · IC025 +7.2 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 161.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Pemphigus | 5,732 | 508.9 492.0–526.5ROR 606.4 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓ | 271.4 EB05 265.6 · IC025 +8.0 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 200.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Swelling | 5,451 | 36.5 35.6–37.4ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓ | 34.4 EB05 33.6 · IC025 +5.1 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 29.4 · serious PRR 40.8 · ♀ 98% (drug 74%) · 92% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Arthropathy | 5,261 | 61.3 59.7–63.0ROR 71.8 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓ | 55.6 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +5.7 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 47.9 · serious PRR 49.8 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 92% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Joint swelling | 5,254 | 26.8 26.2–27.5ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓ | 25.7 EB05 25.1 · IC025 +4.6 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | age-adj. PRR 22.2 · serious PRR 32.3 · ♀ 96% (drug 74%) · 91% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
| Hand deformity | 5,238 | 396.2 383.1–409.7ROR 464.4 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓ | 235.7 EB05 230.4 · IC025 +7.8 3/3 methods agree | No label text to screen label has no adverse-reaction text | serious PRR 188.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% clinician | not reported in cached trials |
Unlabeled candidate signals
Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.
✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methotrexate Sodium ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.
Common questions
What are the most reported side effects of Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1%?
In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% are pain, fatigue, rheumatoid arthritis, rash, abdominal discomfort, systemic lupus erythematosus. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.
Does Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% have an FDA boxed warning?
No. The FDA label retrieved for Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.
Do FAERS signals prove that Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% causes these side effects?
No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.
Sources & methods
- FDA label via openFDA (set ID 0326ea5b-3e1a-dee2-e063-6294a90a13b8, effective 20240709; matched on
openfda.generic_name.exact:"DICLOFENAC SODIUM TOPICAL GEL, 1%") - Bayesian shrinkage measures computed offline over all 1,317,300 cached pairs: BCPNN information component (IC, with Norén closed-form IC025) and MGPS empirical-Bayes geometric mean (EBGM, EB05) with a two-component gamma prior fitted by maximum marginal likelihood (α₁=0.57, β₁=0.02, α₂=1.42, β₂=0.70, w=0.17); unstratified
- FAERS pair statistics from the OpenPV build of 2026-09-14 (openFDA
count=aggregation, fieldpatient.drug.openfda.generic_name.exact, 1,212 reaction terms, min 3 co-reports); PRR/ROR with 95% CI, chi-square with Yates correction - Serious-only and stratified counts (serious:1, patient.patientsex, primarysource.qualification) from openFDA count queries; serious-only PRR uses the drug serious report total and the term global serious total (N_serious=11,882,979); strata shown only when n ≥ 20
- Seriousness and sex counts from openFDA
count=serious,patient.patientsex,seriousnessdeath - ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 (query
DICLOFENAC TOPICAL GEL, results-bearing studies sorted by enrollment)
Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.