← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% side effects: what 35,579 FDA adverse event reports show

Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1% · 1,212 reaction terms · 511,021 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel, 1% (Diclofenac Sodium)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

35,579 reports · 78% serious · 6,894 with death outcome · 74% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

for the temporary relief of arthritis pain ONLY in the following areas: hand, wrist, elbow (upper body areas) foot, ankle, knee (lower body areas) this product may take up to 7 days to work for arthritis pain; it is not for immediate relief. If no pain relief in 7 days, stop use

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Lab value / disease marker 7No label text to screen 33
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,172 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Lupus vulgaris8401,455.5
1,282.9–1,651.4ROR 1,490.7 · calibrated p 3e-19 ✓
411.8 EB05 388.9 · IC025 +8.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=840 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody4661,401.6
1,185.5–1,657.1ROR 1,420.2 · calibrated p 6e-19 ✓
404.3 EB05 374.4 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=466 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased2,0421,143.1
1,061.5–1,230.9ROR 1,212.6 · calibrated p 3e-18 ✓
384.2 EB05 370.5 · IC025 +8.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2,041 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever2,7671,039.6
977.7–1,105.4ROR 1,127.2 · calibrated p 6e-18 ✓
372.2 EB05 360.7 · IC025 +8.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=2,767 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative1,2381,029.6
938.9–1,129.0ROR 1,066.6 · calibrated p 1e-17 ✓
369.7 EB05 352.7 · IC025 +8.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,238 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hepatic enzyme881,021.7
722.1–1,445.4ROR 1,024.2 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
343.1 EB05 287.0 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=88 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength144983.4
752.3–1,285.5ROR 987.4 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
348.7 EB05 303.4 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=144 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein511770.5
675.3–879.1ROR 781.7 · calibrated p 6e-16 ✓
327.6 EB05 304.4 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=511 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive3,987764.3
729.9–800.4ROR 860.6 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
330.0 EB05 321.5 · IC025 +8.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 244.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,628636.8
594.0–682.7ROR 667.3 · calibrated p 3e-15 ✓
303.1 EB05 291.0 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,628 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Duodenal ulcer perforation3,741619.6
592.4–648.0ROR 692.2 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
299.8 EB05 291.8 · IC025 +8.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 220.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive2,910606.5
576.4–638.2ROR 660.5 · calibrated p 3e-15 ✓
296.5 EB05 287.6 · IC025 +8.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2,909 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count121575.7
447.8–740.2ROR 577.7 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓
276.9 EB05 237.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=121 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood942521.8
478.1–569.4ROR 535.9 · calibrated p 3e-14 ✓
273.7 EB05 259.4 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=942 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus5,732508.9
492.0–526.5ROR 606.4 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓
271.4 EB05 265.6 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 200.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia139489.0
390.3–612.7ROR 490.9 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
256.5 EB05 222.7 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=139 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis718448.2
406.8–493.7ROR 457.4 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
251.6 EB05 236.6 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=718 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra944437.7
402.5–476.0ROR 449.6 · calibrated p 2e-13 ✓
248.7 EB05 235.7 · IC025 +7.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=944 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal729409.7
372.8–450.1ROR 418.2 · calibrated p 4e-13 ✓
239.1 EB05 224.9 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=729 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity5,238396.2
383.1–409.7ROR 464.4 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
235.7 EB05 230.4 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 188.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection3,697337.2
324.2–350.6ROR 376.1 · calibrated p 1e-12 ✓
213.4 EB05 207.7 · IC025 +7.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 166.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, hypersomnia type34303.6
200.6–459.7ROR 303.9 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
179.7 EB05 134.5 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=34 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired175279.8
233.7–335.1ROR 281.2 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
185.3 EB05 163.4 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=175 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury2,608275.6
263.4–288.4ROR 297.3 · calibrated p 1e-11 ✓
186.9 EB05 181.0 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 149.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease1,265274.3
256.8–293.0ROR 284.4 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
186.1 EB05 177.6 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,263 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Seronegative arthritis353271.4
239.3–307.8ROR 274.1 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
183.4 EB05 167.9 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=353 · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Folliculitis3,101253.7
243.6–264.3ROR 277.9 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
176.7 EB05 171.5 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 153.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type1,762222.7
211.0–235.0ROR 234.2 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
160.9 EB05 154.7 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,762 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pericarditis4,482217.4
210.4–224.7ROR 248.6 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
158.4 EB05 154.5 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 117.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain)5,736203.9
198.2–209.8ROR 242.9 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
151.1 EB05 147.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 161.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Synovitis4,593201.7
195.4–208.2ROR 231.4 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
149.8 EB05 146.2 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 115.5 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal1,600196.6
186.0–207.9ROR 205.8 · calibrated p 3e-10 ✓
146.9 EB05 140.9 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,600 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Porphyria acute320178.1
157.2–201.8ROR 179.7 · calibrated p 1e-9 ✓
135.4 EB05 123.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=320 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Inspiratory capacity decreased62171.4
129.1–227.5ROR 171.7 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
127.4 EB05 103.0 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=62 · ♀ 0% (drug 74%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lymphatic fistula22165.9
103.3–266.3ROR 166.0 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
116.4 EB05 81.0 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=22 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii1,348156.4
147.4–166.0ROR 162.5 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
123.2 EB05 117.8 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,348 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone erosion689142.4
131.1–154.7ROR 145.2 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
114.2 EB05 107.2 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=688 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lip dry1,679136.0
129.1–143.3ROR 142.7 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
110.3 EB05 105.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,675 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Wound5,150134.1
130.4–138.0ROR 156.6 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
109.1 EB05 106.6 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 106.0 · serious PRR 95.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength decreased1,560128.0
121.3–135.1ROR 133.8 · calibrated p 1e-8 ✓
104.9 EB05 100.6 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=1,553 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Liver injury6,82013.613.3–13.9signal
Interstitial lung disease1,5269.59.1–10.0signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes3,5236.15.9–6.2signal
Serious infection5,4114.24.0–4.3signal
Depression1,9414.13.9–4.3signal
Gi bleeding1,1453.73.5–3.9signal
Pancreatitis3772.82.5–3.1signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema5782.72.5–3.0signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy3282.42.1–2.7signal
Fall / fracture1,4062.22.1–2.3signal
Thrombocytopenia7732.11.9–2.2raised
Severe cutaneous reaction2331.81.6–2.1raised
Tendon disorder1171.81.5–2.2raised
Kidney injury1,3181.71.6–1.8raised
Hyponatraemia2241.61.4–1.9raised
Anaemia7891.61.4–1.7raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)7,7093.5
3.4–3.5ROR 4.1 · calibrated p 0.351
3.4 EB05 3.4 · IC025 +1.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 3.5 · serious PRR 5.9not reported in cached trials
Pain7,4497.2
7.1–7.4ROR 8.9 · calibrated p 0.048 ✓
7.1 EB05 7.0 · IC025 +2.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 6.3 · serious PRR 8.0not reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)7,0305.4
5.3–5.5ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.124
5.3 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 4.4 · serious PRR 7.1 · ♀ 94% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid arthritis6,41135.4
34.6–36.2ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
33.4 EB05 32.7 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 26.9 · serious PRR 30.0 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rash6,1328.4
8.2–8.6ROR 10.0 · calibrated p 0.032 ✓
8.3 EB05 8.2 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 7.3 · serious PRR 13.2 · ♀ 96% (drug 74%)NCT02121002: 1/391 (0.3%) on Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1%
Abdominal discomfort6,03722.1
21.5–22.6ROR 26.4 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
21.3 EB05 20.8 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 17.7 · serious PRR 34.6 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%)not reported in cached trials
Systemic lupus erythematosus5,897118.0
115.0–121.1ROR 141.2 · calibrated p 7e-9 ✓
98.2 EB05 96.1 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 102.2 · serious PRR 74.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Alopecia (hair loss)5,79517.9
17.4–18.3ROR 21.1 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
17.4 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 14.2 · serious PRR 27.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)5,7703.9
3.8–4.0ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.295
3.9 EB05 3.8 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 3.8 · serious PRR 4.9not reported in cached trials
Glossodynia (burning tongue/mouth pain)5,736203.9
198.2–209.8ROR 242.9 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
151.1 EB05 147.8 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 161.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus5,732508.9
492.0–526.5ROR 606.4 · calibrated p 7e-15 ✓
271.4 EB05 265.6 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 200.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swelling5,45136.5
35.6–37.4ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
34.4 EB05 33.6 · IC025 +5.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 29.4 · serious PRR 40.8 · ♀ 98% (drug 74%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Arthropathy5,26161.3
59.7–63.0ROR 71.8 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
55.6 EB05 54.3 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 47.9 · serious PRR 49.8 · ♀ 99% (drug 74%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Joint swelling5,25426.8
26.2–27.5ROR 31.3 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
25.7 EB05 25.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 22.2 · serious PRR 32.3 · ♀ 96% (drug 74%) · 91% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity5,238396.2
383.1–409.7ROR 464.4 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
235.7 EB05 230.4 · IC025 +7.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 188.8 · ♀ 100% (drug 74%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Methotrexate Sodium ↔ Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1%?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% are pain, fatigue, rheumatoid arthritis, rash, abdominal discomfort, systemic lupus erythematosus. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Diclofenac Topical Gel and 1% causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.