← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Diclofenac side effects: what 85,620 FDA adverse event reports show

Diclofenac · Diclofenac Sodium · 1,203 reaction terms · 826,912 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug

FDA label, Indications wording

Brand names

Diclofenac Sodium

openFDA label

Who reports

85,620 reports · 80% serious · 11,042 with death outcome · 68% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Diclofenac sodium topical solution is indicated for the treatment of the pain of osteoarthritis of the knee(s). Diclofenac sodium topical solution is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug indicated for the treatment of the pain of osteoarthritis of the knee(s). ( 1 )

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Diclofenac is a monocarboxylic acid consisting of phenylacetic acid having a (2,6-dichlorophenyl)amino group at the 2-position. It has a role as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a non-narcotic analgesic, an antipyretic, an EC 1.14.99.1 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase) inhibitor, a xenobiotic, an...

PubChem CID 3033 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR AND GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled — boxed warning 1Labeled adverse reaction 1Labeled (related wording) 4Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 27
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,163 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Lupus vulgaris947999.4
865.0–1,154.7ROR 1,010.6 · calibrated p 3e-17 ✓
194.0 EB05 183.8 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=947 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive5,519887.7
838.8–939.5ROR 948.8 · calibrated p 5e-17 ✓
190.0 EB05 185.8 · IC025 +7.5
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 136.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody513845.5
703.6–1,016.0ROR 850.6 · calibrated p 3e-16 ✓
186.8 EB05 173.6 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=513 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased2,379817.8
751.9–889.5ROR 841.1 · calibrated p 2e-16 ✓
186.4 EB05 180.2 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=2,377 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever3,282766.7
715.1–822.1ROR 797.3 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓
183.7 EB05 178.5 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=3,281 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative1,428676.4
611.4–748.3ROR 687.9 · calibrated p 2e-15 ✓
177.8 EB05 170.2 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,428 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Duodenal ulcer perforation5,174600.9
571.3–632.0ROR 639.4 · calibrated p 4e-15 ✓
172.4 EB05 168.5 · IC025 +7.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled — boxed warning
synonym match
serious PRR 123.7 · ♀ 99% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein592468.6
408.1–538.0ROR 471.8 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
158.8 EB05 148.4 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=592 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Grip strength148439.7
335.4–576.4ROR 440.4 · calibrated p 5e-13 ✓
153.1 EB05 133.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=148 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus7,898434.7
419.2–450.8ROR 478.8 · calibrated p 9e-14 ✓
155.5 EB05 152.6 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 112.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome1,966412.8
383.9–443.9ROR 422.5 · calibrated p 3e-13 ✓
152.4 EB05 146.9 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,965 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive3,470375.3
356.0–395.6ROR 391.1 · calibrated p 7e-13 ✓
147.1 EB05 143.0 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=3,468 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood1,104299.8
274.5–327.5ROR 303.7 · calibrated p 9e-12 ✓
133.7 EB05 127.3 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,104 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count134295.8
229.8–380.9ROR 296.3 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
130.8 EB05 113.2 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=134 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity7,093293.3
283.5–303.4ROR 319.7 · calibrated p 5e-12 ✓
132.7 EB05 130.1 · IC025 +7.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 103.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide increased90267.4
198.0–360.9ROR 267.6 · calibrated p 7e-11 ✓
123.9 EB05 103.9 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=90 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra1,131255.5
235.1–277.8ROR 258.9 · calibrated p 4e-11 ✓
124.2 EB05 118.2 · IC025 +6.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,131 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection5,092246.5
237.2–256.2ROR 262.1 · calibrated p 3e-11 ✓
122.2 EB05 119.4 · IC025 +6.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 92.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypocholesterolaemia150234.4
187.2–293.4ROR 234.8 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
117.5 EB05 102.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=150 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis811233.2
211.7–256.7ROR 235.4 · calibrated p 1e-10 ✓
118.6 EB05 111.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=811 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal834216.3
197.0–237.4ROR 218.4 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
114.1 EB05 107.7 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=834 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 97% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury3,779210.4
201.5–219.7ROR 220.1 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
112.7 EB05 109.7 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 87.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Embolia cutis medicamentosa345186.1
161.8–214.2ROR 186.9 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
104.8 EB05 95.8 · IC025 +6.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=345 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Folliculitis4,285174.5
167.8–181.4ROR 183.6 · calibrated p 8e-10 ✓
101.5 EB05 99.0 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 85.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type2,594166.0
157.9–174.4ROR 171.1 · calibrated p 2e-9 ✓
98.6 EB05 95.4 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=2,591 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease1,532153.0
143.5–163.0ROR 155.7 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
93.8 EB05 89.9 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,529 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pericarditis6,268148.2
143.7–152.8ROR 159.8 · calibrated p 3e-9 ✓
92.1 EB05 90.2 · IC025 +6.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.7 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Seronegative arthritis407139.7
123.7–157.8ROR 140.4 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
88.4 EB05 81.4 · IC025 +6.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=407 · ♀ 91% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Synovitis6,513138.7
134.6–142.9ROR 150.0 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
88.3 EB05 86.5 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 66.4 · ♀ 98% (drug 68%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Inspiratory capacity decreased95129.2
100.7–165.7ROR 129.3 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
83.0 EB05 69.9 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=95 · ♀ 0% (drug 68%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal1,865100.6
95.4–106.2ROR 102.9 · calibrated p 9e-8 ✓
71.2 EB05 68.5 · IC025 +6.1
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,864 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Ductus arteriosus stenosis foetal10883.3
66.9–103.7ROR 83.4 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
61.5 EB05 52.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=108 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Porphyria acute34782.2
72.8–92.8ROR 82.5 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
61.3 EB05 56.1 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=347 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii1,60481.3
76.9–86.0ROR 82.8 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
61.0 EB05 58.5 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=1,604 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Wound6,86080.2
78.1–82.4ROR 87.1 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
60.4 EB05 59.2 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 61.3 · serious PRR 51.5 · ♀ 99% (drug 68%) · 92% clinicianNCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Diclofenac (serious AE)
Bone erosion82474.2
68.6–80.2ROR 74.9 · calibrated p 9e-7 ✓
56.9 EB05 53.7 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=823 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Liver injury10,0148.48.2–8.5signal
Interstitial lung disease2,0205.25.0–5.5signal
Anaphylaxis / angioedema2,0004.03.8–4.1signal
Gi bleeding2,5703.53.3–3.6signal
Hyperglycaemia / diabetes4,8233.43.4–3.5signal
Severe cutaneous reaction9453.12.9–3.3signal
Serious infection9,6263.13.0–3.1signal
Depression3,2302.82.7–2.9signal
Tendon disorder4202.72.5–3.0signal
Kidney injury4,6002.52.4–2.6signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy7912.42.2–2.6signal
Fall / fracture3,0402.01.9–2.0raised
Pancreatitis6191.91.7–2.0raised
Hyponatraemia5741.81.6–1.9raised
Anaemia2,1061.71.7–1.8raised
Thrombocytopenia1,2551.41.3–1.5raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Diclofenac as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (1 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)14,1782.7
2.6–2.7ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.632
2.6 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.7 · serious PRR 4.4not reported in cached trials
Pain12,7325.2
5.1–5.2ROR 5.9 · calibrated p 0.158
5.1 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
age-adj. PRR 4.6 · serious PRR 5.4NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Diclofenac (serious AE)
Fatigue (tiredness)11,7653.8
3.7–3.8ROR 4.2 · calibrated p 0.344
3.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 3.1 · serious PRR 4.7 · ♀ 89% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid arthritis9,58522.6
22.2–23.1ROR 25.3 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
20.8 EB05 20.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 16.9 · serious PRR 18.1 · ♀ 98% (drug 68%)NCT00141102: 1/2,237 (0.0%) on Diclofenac (serious AE)
Off label use (used outside approved label)9,1942.6
2.6–2.7ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.693
2.6 EB05 2.5 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 2.3 · serious PRR 3.0not reported in cached trials
Rash9,1905.3
5.2–5.4ROR 5.8 · calibrated p 0.164
5.2 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 4.4 · serious PRR 7.8 · ♀ 93% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)9,0585.5
5.3–5.6ROR 6.0 · calibrated p 0.151
5.4 EB05 5.3 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 4.8 · serious PRR 6.6not reported in cached trials
Abdominal discomfort8,77913.5
13.3–13.8ROR 15.0 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
12.9 EB05 12.6 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 10.6 · serious PRR 20.1 · ♀ 97% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Alopecia (hair loss)8,32310.8
10.6–11.0ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
10.4 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 8.4 · serious PRR 15.6 · ♀ 98% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Joint swelling8,08417.6
17.2–17.9ROR 19.3 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
16.4 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 14.2 · serious PRR 19.9 · ♀ 93% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Systemic lupus erythematosus8,04472.0
70.3–73.8ROR 79.4 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
55.7 EB05 54.7 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 62.5 · serious PRR 41.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus7,898434.7
419.2–450.8ROR 478.8 · calibrated p 9e-14 ✓
155.5 EB05 152.6 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 112.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 68%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swelling7,54621.5
21.0–22.0ROR 23.4 · calibrated p 9e-4 ✓
19.8 EB05 19.4 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 17.0 · serious PRR 22.7 · ♀ 97% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials
Arthropathy7,32136.9
36.0–37.8ROR 40.3 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
32.1 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 29.0 · serious PRR 28.0 · ♀ 98% (drug 68%)not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Diclofenac?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Diclofenac are pain, fatigue, rheumatoid arthritis, rash, arthralgia, abdominal discomfort. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Diclofenac have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISK OF SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR AND GASTROINTESTINAL EVENTS Cardiovascular Thrombotic Events Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, including myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal.

Do FAERS signals prove that Diclofenac causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.