← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Loratadine side effects: what 106,935 FDA adverse event reports show

Loratadine · 1,153 reaction terms · 376,889 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Who reports

106,935 reports · 47% serious · 4,661 with death outcome · 66% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

(S) temporarily relieves these symptoms due to hay fever or other upper respiratory allergies:  runny nose  sneezing  itchy, water eyes  itching of the nose or throat

FDA label, Indications and Usage

Boxed warning

None in the current label

How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Reporting / coding artifact 5Lab value / disease marker 2No label text to screen 33
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,113 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Failure of child resistant mechanism for pharmaceutical product8647.0
37.1–59.5ROR 47.0 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
37.7 EB05 31.5 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–not reported in cached trials
Human rhinovirus test positive6742.8
32.9–55.8ROR 42.9 · calibrated p 5e-5 ✓
34.9 EB05 28.4 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=66 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Accidental exposure to product by child92530.6
28.6–32.8ROR 30.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
26.6 EB05 25.1 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=61 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Respiratory syncytial virus test positive7121.9
17.1–27.9ROR 21.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
19.6 EB05 16.1 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=67 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Chronic spontaneous urticaria9919.3
15.7–23.7ROR 19.3 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
17.5 EB05 14.8 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=94not reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder8015.7
12.5–19.7ROR 15.7 · calibrated p 0.006 ✓
14.5 EB05 12.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=80not reported in cached trials
Mast cell activation syndrome8613.6
10.9–16.9ROR 13.6 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
12.6 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=82 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)not reported in cached trials
Nephrogenic anaemia28712.8
11.3–14.4ROR 12.8 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
12.0 EB05 10.9 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=287not reported in cached trials
Hyperparathyroidism secondary14611.9
10.1–14.1ROR 12.0 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
11.2 EB05 9.7 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=146not reported in cached trials
Rebound acid hypersecretion15210.2
8.6–12.0ROR 10.2 · calibrated p 0.031 ✓
9.6 EB05 8.3 · IC025 +3.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=152not reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge748.8
7.0–11.1ROR 8.8 · calibrated p 0.052
8.2 EB05 6.7 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=49 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Extra dose administered1,6458.4
8.0–8.8ROR 8.5 · calibrated p 0.055
8.1 EB05 7.7 · IC025 +2.9
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 8.1 · serious n=45 · 85% consumernot reported in cached trials
Product package associated injury847.7
6.2–9.6ROR 7.7 · calibrated p 0.078
7.2 EB05 6.0 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Drug effect delayed1727.6
6.5–8.8ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.080
7.2 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Pre-existing condition improved2357.5
6.6–8.6ROR 7.6 · calibrated p 0.080
7.2 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=117not reported in cached trials
Patient dissatisfaction with treatment677.2
5.6–9.1ROR 7.2 · calibrated p 0.097
6.7 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
♀ 0% (drug 66%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Expired product administered1,1667.1
6.7–7.5ROR 7.2 · calibrated p 0.092
6.9 EB05 6.5 · IC025 +2.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 7.3 · serious n=43 · 95% consumernot reported in cached trials
Seasonal allergy4917.0
6.4–7.7ROR 7.1 · calibrated p 0.097
6.8 EB05 6.3 · IC025 +2.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=253not reported in cached trials
Rhinitis allergic1547.0
6.0–8.2ROR 7.0 · calibrated p 0.100
6.7 EB05 5.8 · IC025 +2.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=127not reported in cached trials
Essential hypertension856.6
5.3–8.2ROR 6.6 · calibrated p 0.119
6.2 EB05 5.2 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=79not reported in cached trials
Infusion site pruritus996.4
5.2–7.8ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.130
6.1 EB05 5.1 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=51 · 73% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis1736.4
5.5–7.4ROR 6.4 · calibrated p 0.131
6.1 EB05 5.4 · IC025 +2.4
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=161not reported in cached trials
Infusion site infection716.3
5.0–8.0ROR 6.3 · calibrated p 0.136
5.9 EB05 4.8 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Tongue biting646.2
4.8–8.0ROR 6.2 · calibrated p 0.142
5.8 EB05 4.7 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=61 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site haemorrhage1006.2
5.1–7.6ROR 6.2 · calibrated p 0.141
5.9 EB05 5.0 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=58 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Multiple allergies2215.7
4.9–6.5ROR 5.7 · calibrated p 0.176
5.5 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.2
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=119not reported in cached trials
Chronic sinusitis1025.5
4.5–6.6ROR 5.5 · calibrated p 0.194
5.2 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=87not reported in cached trials
End stage renal disease4985.4
5.0–5.9ROR 5.4 · calibrated p 0.193
5.3 EB05 4.9 · IC025 +2.3
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.5not reported in cached trials
Infusion site swelling1645.3
4.6–6.2ROR 5.3 · calibrated p 0.203
5.1 EB05 4.5 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=76not reported in cached trials
Cholecystitis chronic1765.2
4.5–6.0ROR 5.2 · calibrated p 0.216
5.0 EB05 4.4 · IC025 +2.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 6.3 · ♀ 100% (drug 66%)not reported in cached trials
Nasal dryness1605.1
4.4–6.0ROR 5.1 · calibrated p 0.225
4.9 EB05 4.3 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=45 · 82% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device infusion issue604.9
3.8–6.3ROR 4.9 · calibrated p 0.253
4.6 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifact♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Upper-airway cough syndrome1984.8
4.2–5.6ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.255
4.7 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=98not reported in cached trials
Infusion site erythema2004.8
4.2–5.5ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.256
4.7 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious n=95 · 70% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site pain3044.8
4.2–5.3ROR 4.8 · calibrated p 0.263
4.6 EB05 4.2 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 4.1 · serious n=148 · 77% consumernot reported in cached trials
Sneezing5054.5
4.1–4.9ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.294
4.4 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 3.6 · serious PRR 3.6 · 80% consumernot reported in cached trials
Paranasal sinus discomfort854.5
3.6–5.6ROR 4.5 · calibrated p 0.301
4.3 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
–not reported in cached trials
Ear congestion594.4
3.4–5.6ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.326
4.1 EB05 3.3 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
♀ 100% (drug 66%) · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Chronic kidney disease1,6594.3
4.1–4.5ROR 4.4 · calibrated p 0.316
4.2 EB05 4.1 · IC025 +2.0
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 4.3 · serious PRR 5.3not reported in cached trials
Spinal osteoarthritis1914.3
3.7–5.0ROR 4.3 · calibrated p 0.326
4.2 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
serious PRR 5.2not reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Anaphylaxis / angioedema1,1541.81.7–1.9raised
Depression2,4801.71.7–1.8raised
Serious infection5,6721.41.4–1.5raised
Tendon disorder2681.41.2–1.6raised
Fall / fracture2,5351.31.3–1.4raised
Arrhythmia / qt1,2491.31.2–1.3raised
Kidney injury2,9431.31.2–1.3raised
Venous thromboembolism1,3931.31.2–1.3raised
Anaemia1,8631.21.2–1.3raised
Hyponatraemia4531.11.0–1.2raised
Seizure1,0631.11.0–1.1no difference
Gi bleeding9881.11.0–1.1no difference
Thrombocytopenia1,1771.01.0–1.1no difference
Opportunistic infection7231.01.0–1.1no difference
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis1,2701.01.0–1.1no difference
Heart failure8891.00.9–1.0no difference

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Loratadine as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)12,9921.9
1.9–2.0ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.984
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.0 · 86% consumernot reported in cached trials
Fatigue (tiredness)6,6541.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.788
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.2not reported in cached trials
Nausea5,8711.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.634
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 2.0not reported in cached trials
Headache5,3541.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.780
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.2not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)4,8471.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.644
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.5 · serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)4,8291.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.776
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)4,6201.0
1.0–1.1ROR 1.0 · calibrated p 0.336
1.0 EB05 1.0 · IC025 +0.0Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.0 · serious PRR 1.0not reported in cached trials
Dizziness4,3571.7
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.801
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Pain4,1041.3
1.3–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.523
1.3 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.3No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.6 · serious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Rash3,4701.6
1.5–1.6ROR 1.6 · calibrated p 0.701
1.6 EB05 1.5 · IC025 +0.6No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.2not reported in cached trials
Pruritus (itching)3,3651.8
1.7–1.8ROR 1.8 · calibrated p 0.816
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.6not reported in cached trials
Cough3,0902.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.945
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 2.1 · serious PRR 2.8not reported in cached trials
Vomiting3,0111.3
1.2–1.3ROR 1.3 · calibrated p 0.486
1.3 EB05 1.2 · IC025 +0.3No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.2 · serious PRR 1.5not reported in cached trials
Somnolence (drowsiness)2,9502.9
2.8–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.640
2.9 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 2.4 · serious PRR 2.7not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)2,9001.4
1.3–1.4ROR 1.4 · calibrated p 0.565
1.4 EB05 1.3 · IC025 +0.4No label text to screen
label has no adverse-reaction text
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 2.0not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

Every screened signal with n ≥ 20 was either labeled, an indication term, or an artifact pattern — no unlabeled candidate stood out in the top signals.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Loratadine?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Loratadine are fatigue, nausea, headache, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Loratadine have an FDA boxed warning?

No. The FDA label retrieved for Loratadine has no boxed warning; see the label's Warnings and Precautions for the recognised risks.

Do FAERS signals prove that Loratadine causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.