← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Lorazepam side effects: what 178,697 FDA adverse event reports show

Lorazepam · 1,174 reaction terms · 926,963 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Benzodiazepine

FDA label (Established Pharmacologic Class) · compare the class

Who reports

178,697 reports · 77% serious · 25,768 with death outcome · 64% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

Lorazepam tablets are indicated for the management of anxiety disorders or for the short-term relief of the symptoms of anxiety or anxiety associated with depressive symptoms. Anxiety or tension associated with the stress of everyday life usually does not require treatment with an anxiolytic.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

Lorazepam is a benzodiazepine.

PubChem CID 3958 (ChEBI)

Boxed warning

RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs for patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 1Likely indication confounding 1Lab value / disease marker 7Not in label — unassessed 31
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,134 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Grip strength153231.1
175.5–304.2ROR 231.3 · calibrated p 2e-10 ✓
76.6 EB05 67.0 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=153 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative81383.1
75.9–90.9ROR 83.5 · calibrated p 4e-7 ✓
48.6 EB05 45.8 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=813 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 90% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Lupus vulgaris49082.1
73.1–92.2ROR 82.3 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
48.2 EB05 44.7 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=490 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein33969.9
61.0–79.9ROR 70.0 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
43.7 EB05 39.9 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=339 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Subcutaneous drug absorption impaired19263.7
53.4–76.0ROR 63.8 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
41.2 EB05 36.5 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=192 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood59549.0
44.5–53.9ROR 49.1 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
34.6 EB05 32.3 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Likely indication confounding
shares a disease stem with the indications wording
serious n=591 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
X-ray abnormal50245.7
41.2–50.7ROR 45.9 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
32.9 EB05 30.6 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=502 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody18444.5
37.5–52.7ROR 44.5 · calibrated p 3e-5 ✓
32.2 EB05 28.5 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=184 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Swollen joint count increased81641.4
38.2–44.8ROR 41.6 · calibrated p 4e-5 ✓
30.7 EB05 28.9 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=816 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Dislocation of vertebra56239.5
35.9–43.4ROR 39.6 · calibrated p 6e-5 ✓
29.6 EB05 27.6 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=562 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Facet joint syndrome74035.8
33.0–38.9ROR 36.0 · calibrated p 1e-4 ✓
27.5 EB05 25.9 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=740 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatic fever93331.7
29.5–34.1ROR 31.9 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
25.0 EB05 23.7 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=933 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Retinitis34630.5
27.1–34.3ROR 30.6 · calibrated p 2e-4 ✓
24.3 EB05 22.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=346 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Duodenal ulcer perforation1,41727.9
26.3–29.6ROR 28.1 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
22.6 EB05 21.7 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 16.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Peripheral venous disease76727.7
25.6–30.0ROR 27.8 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
22.5 EB05 21.2 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=766 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Porphyria acute26227.3
23.9–31.2ROR 27.4 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
22.2 EB05 20.1 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 242.6 (132.7–443.4)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=262 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive1,33727.0
25.5–28.7ROR 27.2 · calibrated p 4e-4 ✓
22.1 EB05 21.1 · IC025 +4.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious PRR 16.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Rheumatoid factor positive1,04825.9
24.2–27.7ROR 26.0 · calibrated p 6e-4 ✓
21.3 EB05 20.2 · IC025 +4.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=1,047 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 96% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Muscle injury1,35123.0
21.7–24.3ROR 23.1 · calibrated p 1e-3 ✓
19.3 EB05 18.5 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 335.6 (246.1–457.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 15.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Catatonia84922.7
21.1–24.4ROR 22.8 · calibrated p 0.001 ✓
19.1 EB05 18.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 9.2 (8.4–10.0)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=831not reported in cached trials
Helicobacter infection1,54020.7
19.6–21.9ROR 20.9 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
17.7 EB05 17.0 · IC025 +4.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 61.3 (53.7–69.9)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 14.0 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
C-reactive protein abnormal92319.6
18.3–21.0ROR 19.7 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
16.9 EB05 16.0 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Lab value / disease markerserious n=921 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sleep disorder due to general medical condition, insomnia type91419.3
18.0–20.7ROR 19.4 · calibrated p 0.002 ✓
16.6 EB05 15.8 · IC025 +3.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 160.5 (123.1–209.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious n=910 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Folliculitis1,35817.6
16.7–18.7ROR 17.8 · calibrated p 0.003 ✓
15.4 EB05 14.7 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 69.5 (59.9–80.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 13.4 · ♀ 96% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pemphigus1,60817.3
16.4–18.2ROR 17.5 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
15.2 EB05 14.6 · IC025 +3.8
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 348.5 (260.8–465.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 11.4 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 95% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Soft tissue disorder14417.2
14.5–20.5ROR 17.2 · calibrated p 0.004 ✓
15.1 EB05 13.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=143 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Sopor1,62616.1
15.3–17.0ROR 16.3 · calibrated p 0.005 ✓
14.3 EB05 13.7 · IC025 +3.7
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 4.2 (4.0–4.4)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 12.8 · serious PRR 10.7 · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hand deformity1,46114.6
13.9–15.5ROR 14.8 · calibrated p 0.007 ✓
13.1 EB05 12.5 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 55.5 (48.8–63.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 10.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome1,31514.5
13.7–15.3ROR 14.6 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
13.0 EB05 12.4 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 4.4 (4.1–4.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 12.6 · serious PRR 9.7not reported in cached trials
Lip dry98714.4
13.5–15.4ROR 14.5 · calibrated p 0.008 ✓
12.9 EB05 12.2 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=969 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 93% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Bone erosion36413.3
12.0–14.9ROR 13.4 · calibrated p 0.011 ✓
12.0 EB05 11.0 · IC025 +3.4
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=364 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Pericarditis1,64812.8
12.1–13.4ROR 12.9 · calibrated p 0.013 ✓
11.6 EB05 11.1 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 46.6 (41.6–52.2)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.7 · ♀ 95% (drug 64%) · 94% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Breast cancer stage iii61612.3
11.3–13.4ROR 12.4 · calibrated p 0.015 ✓
11.2 EB05 10.5 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: only this drug
Not in label — unassessedserious n=616 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Hypercholesterolaemia88611.9
11.1–12.7ROR 11.9 · calibrated p 0.017 ✓
10.8 EB05 10.3 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 13.3 (12.0–14.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.4not reported in cached trials
Autoimmune disorder87911.8
11.0–12.6ROR 11.8 · calibrated p 0.018 ✓
10.8 EB05 10.2 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 26.3 (23.3–29.8)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.6 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Bursitis1,08711.5
10.8–12.3ROR 11.6 · calibrated p 0.019 ✓
10.6 EB05 10.0 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 8.9 (8.2–9.6)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.2 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%)not reported in cached trials
Synovitis1,59311.3
10.7–11.9ROR 11.4 · calibrated p 0.021 ✓
10.3 EB05 9.9 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 33.0 (29.8–36.5)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 8.1 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Joint range of motion decreased1,14510.9
10.3–11.6ROR 11.0 · calibrated p 0.023 ✓
10.0 EB05 9.6 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 17.9 (16.3–19.7)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 9.5 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Wound infection91410.7
10.0–11.4ROR 10.7 · calibrated p 0.025 ✓
9.8 EB05 9.3 · IC025 +3.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 21.7 (19.4–24.3)
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 7.9 · ♀ 100% (drug 64%) · 92% cliniciannot reported in cached trials

Clinical concept groups

MedDRA splits one clinical problem across several terms (e.g. "neutropenia", "neutrophil count decreased", "agranulocytosis"), which dilutes term-level signals. These rows count reports with any term in a concept group (an exact union, not a sum), compared with all other drugs. Groups are hand-built and listed in the methods.

ConceptReportsPRR 95% CIReading
Suicidality9,2834.64.5–4.7signal
Extrapyramidal3,5484.13.9–4.2signal
Hyponatraemia2,3243.53.3–3.6signal
Depression7,1813.03.0–3.1signal
Rhabdomyolysis / myopathy2,0323.02.9–3.1signal
Seizure4,8272.92.9–3.0signal
Neutropenia / agranulocytosis5,9182.82.8–2.9signal
Arrhythmia / qt3,6922.32.2–2.3signal
Liver injury5,5712.22.1–2.2signal
Fall / fracture6,9532.22.1–2.2signal
Pancreatitis1,4692.22.0–2.3signal
Anaemia5,4172.12.1–2.2signal
Interstitial lung disease1,6892.12.0–2.2raised
Serious infection13,4432.12.0–2.1signal
Thrombocytopenia3,6552.01.9–2.0raised
Kidney injury7,1931.91.8–1.9raised

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Lorazepam as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (0 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Fatigue (tiredness)13,8212.1
2.1–2.1ROR 2.2 · calibrated p 0.951
2.1 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.7 (3.7–3.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.8 · serious PRR 2.2NCT00624780: 5/50 (10.0%) on Lorazepam; 6/52 (11.5%) control
Nausea13,6422.0
2.0–2.1ROR 2.1 · calibrated p 0.985
2.0 EB05 2.0 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.6 (3.6–3.7)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.1NCT01566539: 1/104 (1.0%) control
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)12,4921.1
1.1–1.1ROR 1.1 · calibrated p 0.388
1.1 EB05 1.1 · IC025 +0.1
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 2.4 (2.4–2.5)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.3 · serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)10,6452.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.954
1.9 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 4.0 (4.0–4.1)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.9NCT00624780: 1/50 (2.0%) on Lorazepam; 3/52 (5.8%) control
Off label use (used outside approved label)10,5851.4
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.618
1.4 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.5
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.2 (3.2–3.3)
Reporting / coding artifactage-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.6not reported in cached trials
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)9,4882.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.966
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.8not reported in cached trials
Anxiety9,0343.8
3.7–3.9ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.386
3.7 EB05 3.7 · IC025 +1.9
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.0)
Likely indication confounding
term in indications; also in warnings
age-adj. PRR 3.6 · serious PRR 3.3NCT00624780: 1/154 (0.6%) on Lorazepam (serious AE)
Headache8,9061.7
1.6–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.778
1.7 EB05 1.6 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 2.9 (2.8–3.0)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.4 · serious PRR 1.9NCT00624780: 10/50 (20.0%) on Lorazepam; 13/52 (25.0%) control
Pain8,8711.7
1.7–1.7ROR 1.7 · calibrated p 0.793
1.7 EB05 1.7 · IC025 +0.7
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 2.9 (2.8–2.9)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 1.7NCT00624780: 1/153 (0.7%) on Lorazepam; 1/52 (1.9%) control
Vomiting8,7982.2
2.2–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.908
2.2 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.6 (3.5–3.6)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 1.9 · serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Dizziness8,3132.0
1.9–2.0ROR 2.0 · calibrated p 0.957
2.0 EB05 1.9 · IC025 +0.9
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.2 (3.1–3.3)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 1.7 · serious PRR 2.0NCT00624780: 10/50 (20.0%) on Lorazepam; 17/52 (32.7%) control
Asthenia (weakness)7,2642.3
2.2–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.881
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.7 (3.6–3.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 2.1not reported in cached trials
Death6,8020.9
0.9–0.9ROR 0.9 · calibrated p 0.257
0.9 EB05 0.9 · IC025 -0.1
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 3.0 (2.9–3.1)
Outcome field, not a reaction
boxed warning mentions mortality
age-adj. PRR 1.0 · serious PRR 0.7not reported in cached trials
Fall6,5642.3
2.3–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.859
2.3 EB05 2.3 · IC025 +1.2
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 2.6 (2.6–2.7)
Not in label — unassessedage-adj. PRR 2.0 · serious PRR 1.9not reported in cached trials
Insomnia (trouble sleeping)6,4142.9
2.8–2.9ROR 2.9 · calibrated p 0.647
2.8 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
vs other Benzodiazepines: PRR 2.7 (2.7–2.8)
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
age-adj. PRR 2.5 · serious PRR 2.9NCT00624780: 13/50 (26.0%) on Lorazepam; 15/52 (28.8%) control

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Lorazepam?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Lorazepam are fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, anxiety, headache. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Lorazepam have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: RISKS FROM CONCOMITANT USE WITH OPIOIDS; ABUSE, MISUSE, AND ADDICTION; and DEPENDENCE AND WITHDRAWAL REACTIONS Concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioids may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and death. Reserve concomitant prescribing of these drugs for patients for whom alternative treatment options are inadequate.

Do FAERS signals prove that Lorazepam causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.