← All drugs
Drug · FAERS side-effect profile with label screen

Amitriptyline side effects: what 17,410 FDA adverse event reports show

Amitriptyline Hydrochloride · 1,188 reaction terms · 108,674 drug–reaction co-reports · data 2026-09-14
Share: X Facebook Reddit Email

Drug class

Not stated in label

Label matched

Amitriptyline Hydrochloride (Amitriptyline Hydrochloride)

closest FDA label found for this product string; brand list suppressed because the label is a related product, not an exact match

Who reports

17,410 reports · 80% serious · 1,314 with death outcome · 71% female

openFDA FAERS counts, all years, deduplication not applied

Used for

For the relief of symptoms of depression. Endogenous depression is more likely to be alleviated than are other depressive states.

FDA label, Indications and Usage

What it is

DESCRIPTION Amitriptyline hydrochloride, USP, a dibenzocycloheptadiene derivative, is a white, or practically white, odorless, crystalline compound which is freely soluble in water and alcohol. It is designated chemically as 10,11-Dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-5 H -dibenzo[a,d] cycloheptene-Δ 5 , γ-propylamine hydrochloride.

FDA label, Description section

Boxed warning

Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

FDA label
How to read this page. FAERS is a spontaneous-reporting system: counts are not incidence rates and a signal is not proof of causation. Each reaction below is run through an automated screen — is the term in the FDA label (known), in the indications (the disease being treated), an administrative/coding term, or none of these (unlabeled)? That screen is mechanical text matching, not a causality assessment. The 30 hand-written Bradford Hill assessments are on the causality assessment page. Not medical advice.

Causality screen of the 40 strongest signals

Labeled (related wording) 3Reporting / coding artifact 6Lab value / disease marker 3Not in label — unassessed 28
What the badges mean

Strongest disproportionality signals

Flagged terms (PRR ≥ 2, χ² ≥ 4, n ≥ 10), ranked by PRR; infinite PRRs (no comparator reports) excluded. The EBGM column is a second, shrinkage-based estimate (MGPS) with its 5th percentile EB05 and the BCPNN IC025; a pair flagged by PRR alone is marked PRR-only and should be read as fragile. The strata column recomputes the PRR on serious reports only (and, for the 300 most-reported drugs, adjusted for age band), and flags pairs whose reports are unusually skewed by sex or come mostly from consumers. Each row also shows the PRR against the other drugs of the same FDA class, which removes most confounding by the condition being treated, and a calibrated p-value: on validation, known non-causes average an ROR of about 2, so significance is judged against that empirical null (✓ = p < 0.05 after calibration). 1,148 further terms are in the interactive explorer. Reaction links open the term's cross-drug page.

Show:
ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Cardiospasm3802,634.2
2,200.5–3,153.3ROR 2,692.8 · calibrated p 2e-22 ✓
785.6 EB05 721.5 · IC025 +8.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=380not reported in cached trials
Cftr gene mutation151,975.6
864.7–4,513.9ROR 1,977.3 · calibrated p 4e-16 ✓
380.6 EB05 244.8 · IC025 +4.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=15not reported in cached trials
Immunisation2561,764.3
1,455.1–2,139.1ROR 1,790.5 · calibrated p 4e-20 ✓
673.6 EB05 607.2 · IC025 +8.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=256not reported in cached trials
Palmoplantar keratoderma3731,308.1
1,129.9–1,514.4ROR 1,336.7 · calibrated p 1e-18 ✓
603.0 EB05 553.4 · IC025 +8.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=373not reported in cached trials
Synovial fluid analysis421,131.5
741.5–1,726.5ROR 1,134.2 · calibrated p 1e-16 ✓
458.0 EB05 353.1 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=42 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Heart sounds32592.7
387.8–905.7ROR 593.8 · calibrated p 1e-13 ✓
319.8 EB05 237.2 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Device wireless communication issue56347.5
258.1–468.0ROR 348.7 · calibrated p 6e-12 ✓
246.4 EB05 196.8 · IC025 +5.9
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=16 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Atrial tachycardia387270.6
242.6–301.9ROR 276.8 · calibrated p 2e-11 ✓
218.2 EB05 200.5 · IC025 +7.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=387not reported in cached trials
Sedation complication428248.7
224.3–275.7ROR 254.9 · calibrated p 5e-11 ✓
203.9 EB05 188.2 · IC025 +7.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=428 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Pruritus genital377232.5
208.4–259.4ROR 237.6 · calibrated p 9e-11 ✓
192.7 EB05 176.9 · IC025 +7.1
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=377not reported in cached trials
Device maintenance issue80198.8
157.0–251.8ROR 199.7 · calibrated p 7e-10 ✓
163.8 EB05 135.8 · IC025 +6.0
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=30 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Prolonged expiration32165.6
114.5–239.7ROR 165.9 · calibrated p 6e-9 ✓
134.0 EB05 99.4 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=32 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Infusion site injury19153.2
95.0–247.0ROR 153.4 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
119.7 EB05 81.0 · IC025 +4.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–NCT01581281: 1/145 (0.7%) on Amitriptyline (serious AE)
Neutropenia neonatal25149.7
98.8–226.8ROR 149.9 · calibrated p 2e-8 ✓
120.9 EB05 86.1 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=25 · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance decreased434145.2
131.6–160.2ROR 148.9 · calibrated p 5e-9 ✓
128.7 EB05 118.9 · IC025 +6.7
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=432 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Carotid artery occlusion375137.3
123.5–152.7ROR 140.3 · calibrated p 9e-9 ✓
122.4 EB05 112.4 · IC025 +6.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=375not reported in cached trials
Multiple drug therapy63119.3
92.1–154.5ROR 119.7 · calibrated p 5e-8 ✓
105.1 EB05 85.1 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=63 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Tenosynovitis stenosans50118.1
88.3–157.8ROR 118.4 · calibrated p 6e-8 ✓
103.3 EB05 81.4 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=50 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%)not reported in cached trials
Sleep terror372116.7
105.0–129.6ROR 119.2 · calibrated p 3e-8 ✓
105.7 EB05 97.0 · IC025 +6.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=372not reported in cached trials
Infusion site discharge133101.4
85.0–121.0ROR 102.2 · calibrated p 1e-7 ✓
92.3 EB05 79.8 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=44 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site induration9990.0
73.4–110.3ROR 90.5 · calibrated p 3e-7 ✓
82.4 EB05 69.7 · IC025 +5.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=23 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site irritation8386.0
68.9–107.4ROR 86.4 · calibrated p 5e-7 ✓
78.8 EB05 65.6 · IC025 +5.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=24 · 90% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site warmth7782.2
65.3–103.5ROR 82.6 · calibrated p 6e-7 ✓
75.6 EB05 62.4 · IC025 +5.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=21 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Body tinea3681.9
58.4–114.8ROR 82.1 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
73.8 EB05 55.7 · IC025 +4.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=36 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site inflammation4177.8
56.7–106.6ROR 77.9 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
70.7 EB05 54.4 · IC025 +4.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site discolouration5277.2
58.4–102.2ROR 77.5 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
70.8 EB05 56.0 · IC025 +5.0
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Infusion site haemorrhage19576.9
66.6–88.9ROR 77.8 · calibrated p 8e-7 ✓
71.8 EB05 63.8 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · 96% consumernot reported in cached trials
Patient dissatisfaction with device1475.1
43.8–128.9ROR 75.2 · calibrated p 4e-6 ✓
64.7 EB05 41.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessed–not reported in cached trials
Infusion site infection13073.1
61.3–87.3ROR 73.7 · calibrated p 1e-6 ✓
68.3 EB05 59.0 · IC025 +5.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=54 · 88% consumerNCT01581281: 14/144 (9.7%) on Amitriptyline; 10/72 (13.9%) control
Infusion site nodule5172.1
54.4–95.7ROR 72.3 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
66.4 EB05 52.5 · IC025 +4.9
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=12 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Creatinine renal clearance increased4067.5
49.1–92.9ROR 67.7 · calibrated p 3e-6 ✓
62.1 EB05 47.6 · IC025 +4.6
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=40 · ♀ 100% (drug 71%) · 100% cliniciannot reported in cached trials
Infusion site pain67366.9
62.0–72.2ROR 69.5 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
63.2 EB05 59.3 · IC025 +5.8
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=190 · 94% consumerNCT00471445: 1/227 (0.4%) on Amitriptyline (serious AE)
Infusion site erythema42164.3
58.4–70.8ROR 65.9 · calibrated p 2e-6 ✓
60.9 EB05 56.2 · IC025 +5.7
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=119 · 95% consumernot reported in cached trials
Device infusion issue11257.6
47.7–69.6ROR 57.9 · calibrated p 6e-6 ✓
54.5 EB05 46.5 · IC025 +5.2
3/3 methods agree
Reporting / coding artifactserious n=33 · 100% consumernot reported in cached trials
Cerebellar stroke1757.1
35.1–92.9ROR 57.1 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
51.5 EB05 34.1 · IC025 +3.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=17not reported in cached trials
Brain malformation1656.1
34.0–92.6ROR 56.2 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
50.6 EB05 33.0 · IC025 +3.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious n=16not reported in cached trials
Carbon dioxide abnormal1456.1
32.8–95.8ROR 56.1 · calibrated p 2e-5 ✓
50.1 EB05 31.7 · IC025 +3.3
3/3 methods agree
Lab value / disease markerserious n=14not reported in cached trials

Trial evidence (ClinicalTrials.gov)

✓ Trial adverse-event data found on ClinicalTrials.gov

Largest completed trials with posted results that list Amitriptyline as a study intervention. The right-hand column of the signal table shows whether each FAERS term was also recorded in these trials, with a real denominator (3 of 40 signal terms matched).

Caveats: trial populations, doses and follow-up differ from the reporting population; AE terms are sponsor-coded and matched here by wording; absence from a trial list means the term was not reported above the sponsor's frequency threshold, not that it cannot occur.

Most frequently reported reactions

By raw co-report count, regardless of disproportionality. Common terms here are often the illness itself or generic outcomes.

ReactionReportsPRR 95% CI · ROR · χ²/pEBGM EB05 · IC025Label screenSerious-only & strataTrial cross-check
Pain1,6503.2
3.1–3.4ROR 3.5 · calibrated p 0.494
3.2 EB05 3.1 · IC025 +1.6
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.2NCT00471445: 1/227 (0.4%) on Amitriptyline (serious AE)
Nausea1,5342.3
2.2–2.5ROR 2.5 · calibrated p 0.826
2.3 EB05 2.2 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.6NCT00471445: 2/227 (0.9%) on Amitriptyline; 7/231 (3.0%) control
Headache1,4752.8
2.7–3.0ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.624
2.8 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3NCT00471445: 4/227 (1.8%) on Amitriptyline; 3/231 (1.3%) control
Fatigue (tiredness)1,4492.2
2.1–2.4ROR 2.4 · calibrated p 0.876
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.1
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.5NCT01581281: 43/144 (29.9%) on Amitriptyline; 10/72 (13.9%) control
Dyspnoea (shortness of breath)1,4393.1
2.9–3.2ROR 3.2 · calibrated p 0.551
3.1 EB05 2.9 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 2.7NCT00471445: 2/227 (0.9%) on Amitriptyline; 5/231 (2.2%) control
Dizziness1,2253.0
2.8–3.1ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.591
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3NCT01581281: 3/144 (2.1%) on Amitriptyline; 1/72 (1.4%) control
Diarrhoea (diarrhea)1,1842.2
2.1–2.3ROR 2.3 · calibrated p 0.901
2.2 EB05 2.1 · IC025 +1.0
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.3NCT00471445: 2/227 (0.9%) on Amitriptyline; 6/231 (2.6%) control
Malaise (feeling unwell)1,0923.0
2.8–3.2ROR 3.1 · calibrated p 0.587
3.0 EB05 2.8 · IC025 +1.5
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.3not reported in cached trials
Vomiting1,0632.7
2.6–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.680
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 2.6NCT00471445: 2/227 (0.9%) on Amitriptyline; 4/231 (1.7%) control
Fall1,0523.8
3.6–4.0ROR 4.0 · calibrated p 0.379
3.8 EB05 3.6 · IC025 +1.8
3/3 methods agree
Labeled adverse reaction
exact term
serious PRR 3.1not reported in cached trials
Off label use (used outside approved label)1,0481.5
1.4–1.5ROR 1.5 · calibrated p 0.630
1.5 EB05 1.4 · IC025 +0.4Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.7not reported in cached trials
Arthralgia (joint pain)9882.9
2.7–3.1ROR 3.0 · calibrated p 0.632
2.9 EB05 2.7 · IC025 +1.4
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 3.4not reported in cached trials
Cognitive disorder95525.2
23.7–26.8ROR 26.6 · calibrated p 5e-4 ✓
24.7 EB05 23.4 · IC025 +4.5
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 24.8NCT01581281: 14/144 (9.7%) on Amitriptyline; 8/72 (11.1%) control
Drug ineffective (drug did not work)8960.8
0.8–0.9ROR 0.8 · calibrated p 0.189
0.8 EB05 0.8 · IC025 -0.4
PRR-only: not supported by EBGM or IC
Reporting / coding artifactserious PRR 1.3not reported in cached trials
Pruritus (itching)8592.7
2.6–2.9ROR 2.8 · calibrated p 0.686
2.7 EB05 2.6 · IC025 +1.3
3/3 methods agree
Not in label — unassessedserious PRR 4.1not reported in cached trials

Unlabeled candidate signals

These flagged terms were not found in the FDA label text and do not match an artifact pattern. They are the pairs that would merit a structured assessment (temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across databases, trial or cohort evidence). The screen has not done that; string-matching misses label wording, and a strong PRR can still be stimulated reporting, co-medication, or the disease itself.

✓ A hand-written Bradford Hill causality assessment exists for this drug: Amitriptyline ↔ Tachycardia.

Want to assess one of these properly? The runbook describes the Bradford Hill / trial-evidence workflow used on the assessment page, and handoff_top1000_signals.csv lists the strongest unassessed pairs across all drugs.

Common questions

What are the most reported side effects of Amitriptyline?

In FDA FAERS, the most frequently co-reported reaction terms for Amitriptyline are pain, nausea, headache, fatigue, dyspnoea, dizziness. These are report counts, not rates: FAERS has no denominator, reporting is voluntary and uneven, and a term can be reported because of the illness being treated rather than the drug.

Does Amitriptyline have an FDA boxed warning?

Yes. The current FDA label carries a boxed warning: Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs Antidepressants increased the risk compared to placebo of suicidal thinking and behavior (suicidality) in children, adolescents and young adults in short-term studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) and other psychiatric disorders.

Do FAERS signals prove that Amitriptyline causes these side effects?

No. A disproportionality signal (PRR, ROR) means a reaction is reported more often with this drug than with others in the database. That can reflect a real effect, but also the disease being treated, stimulated reporting after news or litigation, co-medications, or how reports are coded. Causality needs temporality, dose-response, biological plausibility, consistency across data sources and, ideally, trial or cohort evidence. This page screens each term against the FDA label and ClinicalTrials.gov results; it does not establish causation.

Sources & methods

Page generated 2026-10-14. Label and PubChem text are retrieved automatically and may lag the current label; always check the current prescribing information. OpenPV is a beta research tool of the Open Source Medicine Foundation.